Flip it round to see how unusual it is, and how pervasive a bias:

Trump's target audience who are not outraged at Trump's renovation of Lincoln bathroom really need to scroll some facebook of their educated liberal big city relatives and friends to see what kind of aesthetic resonates with them.

See educated big city US folks drive their cars like this do do dooo do do do do dooooo but the Facebook less established relatives and friends who accepted the resonance of Trump’s aesthetics drive their cars like this dee dee dee a de de dee de dee

this is what it offered--not quite so presumptuous imo but a very silly use of eg when one is offering "any time"

"If you’re open to it, I can make any time work next week (e.g., Tue 11/4 morning or Thu 11/6 late afternoon ET), or I’m happy to email a few questions instead—whatever’s easiest."

Is that "someone" chat gpt? Let me do a quick test

That's what you get for fucking a widow before her husband's body is cold

ugh you didn't mean a basic number of questions get your words in order you dumbass

Not so much vague in the sense of "unclear" but definitely vague in the sense of "general"--eg "due process" etc

We readers also got old

reasonably healthy! peanut butter. protein. blackberries are a superfood

happy to chat!

yeah i'm extremely pro-vinegar so that's what I usually want in those salads but you dont have to choose

He's also enormous and good at sports so this seems likely

Yeah just eggs and oil, not some mystery. I think distaste is more from association with what some people pair it with.

and still so many people see it as though they are getting free money in april

Frankly that sounds awesome!

I'm pissing off BOTH SIDES so you know I'm onto something

Yes from the principle that in many cases the dreading is the worst part

And also makes shitty behavior an asset because why would you fake that. the rise of vice signaling

We fly too close to the sun not because it is easy but because it is hard

I do think the story is as much about the technology as it is legalizing the gambling per se.

I think it's just that we had settled into a sort of equilibrium, if we were starting from scratch who knows where the lines would end up. But going from having to travel to LasVegas to getting algorithmic push notifications on your phone prompting you to bet was a big change

Im sort of making a parallel observation

Oh I think what you're saying makes sense

we have this through-the-looking-glass situation where it's like the offensive shit means that i have to vote for them or else im being narrow-minded

Well it is a little tough in this context to disentangle "let back into the tent" and "vote for." Like if I say I'm not inclined to vote for the guy who said a bunch of racist shit years ago, is that not letting into the tent? It feels like it gets characterized that way and then

Thanks!

Sorry what's the Ohtani to toronto bit?

As a corollary if *i* discuss any of the above we can only conclude that it was so fascinating that i could not help but reluctantly share

things i, a 40-something man, do not care to hear about from my peers.
1) their fantasy sports teams
2) their gambling
3) their group chats
4) their (literal) dreams, ie the ones that happen while they sleep

I see the appeal of *being* in one for sure. I see less appeal in *talking* about being in one and much less appeal in *hearing* people talking about theirs.