AKA the rapture for nerds
26.02.2026 13:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0AKA the rapture for nerds
26.02.2026 13:36 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Wouldn't GDP trend to 0 in a post scarcity tech singularity too?
26.02.2026 13:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Unlikely it will all go ahead, but impact on generators would be positive, higher prices, lower TNUoS and Locational Loss Factors. Reduced B6 boundary flows would limit constraint payments and negate negative press.
08.12.2025 11:23 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0CPS goes on for another year
26.11.2025 13:47 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0It just shifts costs from one area to another, customers will be only marginally better off, while diluting the cashout signal which means less DSR, less storage, so ultimately consumers will suffer from higher prices driven by keeping gas on the system.
14.11.2025 08:53 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If you want to give a battery developer nightmares, show them the CBA for P462. The modification proposes to remove subsidy costs from the BM, reducing the number of negative prices in cash-out and feeding through into whoelsale markets. The initial CBA results show a near 60% reduction in revenues!
13.11.2025 13:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0From this blog: blog.dshr.org/2025/10/depr...
22.10.2025 14:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I dont feel so bad about running my 1060 now
22.10.2025 14:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0You'll need a BEGA
13.10.2025 09:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0No one tell them how much the cost of gas turbines has gone up...I reckon they're up about Β£35/MWh on an LCOE basis on a couple of years ago. That would put them on a par with new build offshore wind now even without the Carbon.
08.10.2025 12:59 β π 5 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0If its trained on todays dispatch decision making how will it be any better? participants want a neutral optimal decisions making tool, probably not going to be an LLM.
18.09.2025 14:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Cost of new gas generators has been going up, so its not clear this is a cost effective option, compared to picking another market to build your LLM abacus in.
18.09.2025 11:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Unlikely any new CCGTs can be built before 2030, so its a lifeline for aging gas plant, or they build much less efficient OCGTs or Recips.
www.thetimes.com/uk/technolog...
Removing the ETS will increase CfD prices as well by impacting the merchant tail.
05.09.2025 14:38 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
If anyone was planning on buying me a gift...
shop.c20society.org.uk/products/pre...
Read it now! How much of the saving was from removing UK ETS and CPS vs. redispatch of IC/gas plant?
05.09.2025 10:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I probably need to read the paper! Sounds like a traders dream though, buy sell power to NESO when they dispatch gas and then buy it from ZMC at lower cost?
04.09.2025 14:14 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Are ICs buying power at the NESO gas market stage or the post gas ZMC market? Both, I Guess?
04.09.2025 13:35 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Does the CfD reference price change, without a fuelled gen in the merit order the CfD would default to no payments most of the time?
04.09.2025 12:57 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0IMO fixing the dispatch issues with the BM and using batteries better erodes the capability of CCGTs to dictate prices at the margin, and what about the smaller plant like Recips, surely they just see the CCGTs bidding at SRMC and become the new marginal plant?
04.09.2025 09:36 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Gas plant is very competetive, their margins aren't enormous, will the government be running these gas plant without any margins to pay for network charges or rent?
04.09.2025 08:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Sorry, gas would be 15% of the generation mix, but it would be running 57% of the time. So how is this a reserve? These reserve plants would still need to recover costs, how does this break the link to gas prices? The only way to break that link is to replace gas.
04.09.2025 07:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0But we would still need the gas plant to run 15% of the time by 2028 its hardly a reserve. What about the reciprocating engines, should they also be nationalised? Who buys the gas?
04.09.2025 07:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This will have no impact on AR7 : a) unlikely these companies will rise to the bait b) they are protected by CiL provisions in the CfD contract which is a private law contract between the state and the developer c) ISDS are a nasty thing to get on the wrong side of
17.07.2025 06:42 β π 6 π 2 π¬ 4 π 1Just waiting for the inevitable article on the perfidious injustice of Mandatory Half Hourly Settlement.
16.07.2025 11:17 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Here is the consutlation response document assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/687654...
15.07.2025 13:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The government now intends to offer 20 years CfDs to Offshore and Onshore wind, and Solar PV. Key impacts here are lowering the overall CfD price by spreading the support out longer and reducing the merchant tail risk (esp. important following REMA).
15.07.2025 13:52 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Not sure how to balance TNUoS reform, its already got a wide locational signal, but making it more predictable & sending a higher locational signal work at cross purposes. The DC model is sensitive to capacity changes, so presumably bin that? But then how do you objectively set the locaitonal signal
10.07.2025 07:08 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0