Researcher Adherence to Journal Data Sharing Policies: A Meta-Research Study - Peer Review Congress
Aidan Christopher Tan,1,2 Yiyi Lin,1 Michellie Lian,1 Zhilin Ren,1 Tony Lian,1 Vincent Yuan,3 Angela Webster,1 Anna Lene Seidler1 Objective We aimed to describe researcher adherence to journal data sharing policies across health research. This included describing what factors increase intention to share data and how journal policies requiring data sharing impact intended data sharing. Design Read more...
Among 134 higher-impact journals, 36 required, 98 recommended #datasharing. Most studies intended to share data for purposes and by mechanisms at the discretion of and subject to approval by the PI, without supporting documents or specified timeframes
05.09.2025 18:30 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
When asked what do you do if an author doesn't adhere to your policy Robert Thibault indicates "we provide annual summary of their open science activities: here is what you could have done, and here is what you have done". It works!
#openscience #PRC10
05.09.2025 19:12 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Ethical review boards in Sweden handled 20,440 applications 2021-23, mostly amendments, primarily from health care systems (51%), universities (42%), & corporations (3%). COVID-19 studies had expedited processing times (median t to decision, 51 vs 63d; P < .001). @GustavNilsonne
Ethical review boards in Sweden handled 20,440 applications 2021-23, mostly amendments, primarily from health care systems (51%), universities (42%), & corporations (3%). COVID-19 studies had expedited processing times (median t to decision, 51 vs 63d; P < .001). @stockholm-uni.bsky.social @ki.se
04.09.2025 21:05 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0
The study highlights the increasing prominence of East Asia, particularly China, in registered clinical trials, though with a primarily domestic focus. Improvements in existing trial registries covering East Asia are desirable
In 2014-23 China experienced rapid growth in RCTs, surpassing Japan & the US. Neoplastic, CV, metabolic disease accounted for the largest percentages, each representing ~15-25% of all registered trials. In the US, mental health trials increased, reflecting growing interest in the area.
05.09.2025 16:36 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
A funder-led intervention to monitor and support a robust open science policy can foster the posting of preprints and the sharing of data, code, protocols, and key lab materials.
@asapresearch.parkinsonsroadmap.orgβs #OpenScience policy and compliance workflow β requiring grantees to post preprints, deposit research outputs, unambiguously i.d. research inputs β led to increases in all outcomes and activities.
peerreviewcongress.o...
05.09.2025 18:50 β π 4 π 2 π¬ 0 π 1
Results slide
RT: Results: 102 publications in last year.
Most manuscripts do good job in sharing data, but large increase in sharing from manuscript stage to publication.
Research record should not just include vetted claim, but stands upon peer review, analysis, raw data, procedures, and lab materials.
#PRC10
05.09.2025 19:01 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0
@bmehmani.bsky.social and mine work (and interview) is featured in the Nature's News on Peer Review - nature.com/articles/d41586-025-02457-2. Reminder that for 2,857 Elsevier journals, Md 7 reviewers are invited, 2 accept, within Md 9 days of being invited - see: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
07.08.2025 17:05 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
Would you like to work with an #EarthScience journal, publishing key regional research in Denmark, Greenland & the North Atlantic? We are looking for a part-time Journal Manager (maternity cover) to support the editorial team at our flagship, diamond #OpenAccess journal. Read more:
buff.ly/xNYTZa9
02.07.2025 07:36 β π 4 π 3 π¬ 0 π 3
The Peer Review Workbench #dataset is updated with all Elsevier #journals & manuscripts metadata from
January 2018 to December 2024!
www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en...
Meet the advisory board at #Metascience2025 next week!
#PeerReview #PeerReviewWorkbench #AcademicPublishing #OpenScience #Transparency
26.06.2025 11:08 β π 7 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0
How do you check on your loved ones when there is a total operation outage in their country?
19.06.2025 10:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
How to Assess Peer Review Quality - EASE
peer review committee of @easeeditors.bsky.social published a new item in its toolkit guiding journals on how to assess peer review quality: ease.org.uk/communities/...
@mariomalicki.bsky.social @jadrankaos.bsky.social #Peerreview #quality
12.06.2025 07:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
10th Peer Review Congress - Peer Review Congress
The peer review congress in Chicago @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social announced its program. I won't travel to the US in these uncertain times. Don't miss @mariomalicki.bsky.social presentation of our work #peerreview
peerreviewcongress.org/peer-review-...
10.06.2025 08:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Are you an author who has gone through a journal peer review process but hasnβt done any peer review? I would like to know what do you think about peer review quality in a 1- hour online interview session. DM me if youβre willing to share #peerreview#quality
09.06.2025 16:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Choke in your web of lies, Duo.
05.06.2025 05:57 β π 85 π 6 π¬ 5 π 1
Analysing Elsevier Journal Metadata with a New Specialized Workbench inside ICSR Lab
In this white paper we introduce Elsevier's Peer Review Workbench which will be available via the computational platform ICSR Lab. The workbench offers a unique
Peer review workbench dataset is updated! We have all Elsevier jnls and manuscripts metadata from 1-1-2019 to 1-1-2025! Check our updated white paper here:
ssrn.com/abstract=421...
@peerreviewresearch.bsky.social @mariomalicki.bsky.social @easeeditors.bsky.social @peerreviewcongress.bsky.social
03.06.2025 20:44 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
In the science communication session, one speaker pointed out that 30% of the public did not know the Moon was smaller than the Earth, but they still support science. #SSP2025 So many academics don't appreciate or think that public science communication is a worthwhile effort, particularly in hiring
29.05.2025 18:39 β π 5 π 3 π¬ 3 π 0
EASE Presidents 1982-2027 - EASE
Warning!! This is a self-promotion post: @easeeditors.bsky.social has a new president: ease.org.uk/about-us/his...
30.05.2025 13:18 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
"Another key point of this research is the identification of eight quality characteristics for review texts: constructive/helpful, specific, fair, thorough/comprehensive, readability/organization/clarity, tone, objectivity, and consistency" #Peerreviewquality
29.05.2025 13:55 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I have been editor for many Registered Reports and many traditional articles, and it is truly amazing how null results suddenly appear all over the place in Registered Reports. Almost as if there is some problem with our traditional approach. Someone should look into that.
29.05.2025 13:04 β π 57 π 12 π¬ 1 π 0
The editors of Intelligence-based medicine (published by Elsevier) warn about using Gen AI in the manuscript peer review process:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266652122500050X
#GenAI #peerreview
21.05.2025 15:46 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Nice to hear! I will see if I can get this ball rolling and will keep you posted
21.05.2025 08:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Day 3 at #easeconference. My colleague @morebrains.coop, @alicemeadows.bsky.social giving the keynote on author identity in the age of misinformation
16.05.2025 07:14 β π 3 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
Iryna Izarova of University of Ukraine is presenting on the challenges of conducting scientific publishing in an occupied country.
Appropriation of research and publications robs countries of their intellectual identity and violates academic freedom.
#easeconference
16.05.2025 07:38 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
Really important points by Sofie WennstrΓΆm, speaking about @thinkchecksub.bsky.social at #easeconference.
In the discussion about author behaviour when it comes to predatory journals, poor university / employer support and training isn't talked about enough
16.05.2025 08:11 β π 4 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0
Very much on the theme of our conference this week.
#EASEoslo
16.05.2025 09:01 β π 5 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
Iβm thinking of putting a working group proposal together for NISO to standardize the terminology @nicolinevdl.bsky.social @nisoinfo.bsky.social
15.05.2025 08:37 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Malinformation is information based on fact that is intended to do harm. Phishing is an example of malinformation, as is mislabelling a photo with the wrong time, place, or subject to fuel a false narrative.
#easeconference
14.05.2025 14:51 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
80% of disinformation on social media is shared by 0.05% of users.
#easeconference
14.05.2025 15:04 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0
Connecting the global metascience community. The Metascience Alliance is a new network fostering collaboration across disciplines, sectors, and regions to improve the research system. Learn more or get involved at cos.io/metascience-alliance.
Wildlife Ecologist. Passionate about open science, scientific publishing, & peer review. Founder of @StacksJournal.bsky.social, a scientific journal designed ease & ethics.
Learn More & Join Us β¬οΈ
https://www.stacksjournal.org
Senior Lecturer at the Strathclyde Law School | passionate about anything involving critical theory, environmental justice and comparative law | ποΈβοΈπ
Innovative People Advancing Scholarly Communication
SSP's mission is to advance scholarly publishing and communication, and the professional development of its members through education, collaboration, and networking.
Cofounder MoreBrains Cooperative (https://morebrains.coop). Passionate about scholarly comms, improving trust and transparency in research, DEIA. Views my own. She/her
scientist with a PhD in toxicology | views are my own
Chief Editor of Nature Biomedical Engineering. Ph.D. Previously at Nature Methods. @rita_strack on the place formerly known as twitter.
π· vibe adulting
#HCI #PeerReview #SciPub
#toolsforthought #ResearchSynthesis
#OpenScience #MetaSci #FoSci
π Research: ethnography of open peer review
π§βπ« Teaching: Stats, DataViz
π’ UMD: College of Info
π PhD Candidate: Info Studies / HCI + Data
ποΈ OASISlab
The Brief, from Clarke & Esposito, is the world's best newsletter, for those interested in professional and scholarly communication. Interspersed with just the right amount of snark. Get Briefed!
π https://www.ce-strategy.com/subscribe
Experienced practitioner of info & library management, research publishing, teaching & learning, and knowledge workflows. #ScholarlyCommunication #DiamondOA
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8922-7839 | https://lwilkinson.eu/
Professor Emeritus of Methodology and Integrity, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
I'm an Amsterdam-based epidemiologist interested in Research Integrity and Open Science, and much more.
ORCID 0000-0002-2659-5482 - Profile page: https://bit.ly/48aE9vI
Encouraging research into the quality and credibility of peer review and scientific publication, to establish the evidence base on which scientists can improve the conduct, reporting, and dissemination of scientific research.
peerreviewcongress.org.
Centre for Biostatistics, Uni of Manchester. INSPECT-SR, a tool to identify problematic clinical trials. Research misconduct, fertility research. Own opinions.
Marketing/Community Development @scholasticahq.bsky.social
Bookworm, writer, feminist, animal lover. I believe business can benefit people + π. Views are my own.
Serving ReproducibiliβοΈ at 100+ locations: Blends include transparency, openess and robustness + spoonfuls of science.
Find out more on our website: https://reproducibilitea.org/
Check out our podcast: https://soundcloud.com/reproducibilitea
Open scholarly communication enthusiast with a specific focus on peer review and research assessment, emerging trends in scholarly publishing, editorial quality, research integrity, and research data management. Loves mountains. @ University of Zadar
Research Scholar at the Stanford Program on Research Rigor and Reproducibility (SPORR)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0698-1930