Phil Feller's Avatar

Phil Feller

@philfeller.bsky.social

IT professional and scholar of 19th century American political culture. Currently working on a microhistory of the 1855 Know Nothing triumph, part of a project exploring the continuation of antebellum republican thought into the Progressive Era.

159 Followers  |  124 Following  |  575 Posts  |  Joined: 14.11.2024
Posts Following

Posts by Phil Feller (@philfeller.bsky.social)

You got straight to the heart of the matter.

28.02.2026 00:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I had a summer job doing this and other low-skill IT jobs for Monroe County. The episode I still remember was when the carriage control tape broke on the line printer and it started spewing out paper.

26.02.2026 17:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

The name Scipione is another sign of the extent to which XVI century Italy was harkening back to Roman models.

26.02.2026 14:00 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That was great.

I’m the descendant of Irish Catholics who immigrated following the potato famine. My study of the 1850s, though, has forced me to consider the context in which the Know Nothings rose and consider that many were motivated by things other than nativism and religious bigotry.

25.02.2026 13:57 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I haven’t read Fate of the Republic, but I assume that Guiteau didn’t have as many direct interactions with the other main figures , and that those scenes were intended to illustrate character and what would otherwise be abstract concepts. That doesn’t bother me.

25.02.2026 00:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My one complaint was with the way that the show often mined Guiteau’s story for comic fodder, leading them to misrepresent the Oneida Community as orgiastic. It would have been more interesting (and historical) had they explored its utopian appeal.

24.02.2026 15:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

He’d be better suited to give the response to Chuck D’s address.

24.02.2026 15:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In the area of political theory, a lot of it did filter through Italian Renaissance thinkers. Pocock’s classic Machiavellian Moment analyzed how the English Commonwealth writers received Aristotle’s and Polybius’ political thought.

24.02.2026 14:44 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That was outstanding. Among many other things, I liked your description of the US operation as β€œclassical.” Vegetius would have had a thing or two to say about the failure to fortify overnight camps.

24.02.2026 14:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Like Gunnar, I think that its use in the coding assignments is legit. I’ve been using GitHub Copilot and other AI to help me build and analyze multinomial-Diriclet modules, and it’s made me much more productive.

22.02.2026 22:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A court order froze the account.

20.02.2026 14:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I haven’t painted it yet, but I have a new model army.

19.02.2026 18:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, I’m a JQA fan, although not enough of one to read his lectures on rhetoric and oratory.

I think that presidents should be ranked by their ability at epideictic, not just persuasion.

19.02.2026 01:38 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

A mathematician would probably dispute that she used it correctly.

19.02.2026 01:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Plus they’re named after people who created notable Catholic religious art.

19.02.2026 01:29 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

FWIW, here’s how historians rank the presidents on public persuasion in a C-SPAN poll: www.c-span.org/presidentsur...

That’s the closest they get to ranking their rhetorical abilities, although the categories of moral authority and vision/agenda setting are related.

17.02.2026 15:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I’m curious how you’d rank the presidents as rhetoricians. I imagine that Lincoln would top that list, too.

17.02.2026 14:07 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also true of political history!

16.02.2026 14:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That was a great episode! I’m always interested in 19th century political economy, and it sounds as though O’Connor’s book is a particularly good example.

As an added bonus, I used to work at an office in Durham’s American Tobacco Campus, and I now have a better idea of its role in US history.

14.02.2026 22:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I missed yesterday’s discussion with Matt Pinsker and will definitely watch the recording.

14.02.2026 19:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

après moi, de luge

13.02.2026 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This view of 18th century warfare came up, in passing, in the most recent Ones and Tooze podcast, when Tooze spoke about American football's β€œextraordinary top-down management,” which he described as β€œlike an 18th century battle with intense remote control.”

12.02.2026 23:19 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gives a whole new meaning to party politics. 🎈

12.02.2026 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gotta admit that that curlers have stones.

11.02.2026 16:57 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You just sold me on the Kickstarter. I’d guess that Citino might also argue that the popular perception of the Wehrmacht (and the Waffen SS) as highly effective forces also contributed.

11.02.2026 16:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting. How big a part did the myth of the clean Wehrmacht play?

11.02.2026 16:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Have you read Tom Holland’s Dominion, and, if so, what’s your take? I haven’t read it, but I’ve heard quite a lot about it.

11.02.2026 15:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That reminds me of the best opening line on a 1979 album: β€œOh, I just don’t know where to begin” (β€œAccidents Will Happen,” side 1, track 1 on Elvis Costello’s Armed Forces).

10.02.2026 13:23 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Post a banger that’s not in English.

youtu.be/8soQkubMk1g?...

10.02.2026 01:48 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I’ve loved Philip Ethington’s The Public City: The Political Construction of Urban Life in San Francisco, 1850-1900, so much so that I emailed him two Thanksgivings ago to let him know. I’ve found his concepts of romantic republicanism and republican liberalism quite eye-opening.

09.02.2026 16:42 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0