Daniel W. Linna Jr.

Link to PLI AI in law practice fo summer associates and interns:
www.pli.edu/programs/art...

Law students: You must know how to use AI responsibly and well to succeed in your internship and career.

This FREE, 3-hour PLI program provides the fundamentals for using AI responsibly and well in law practice.

Proud to partner with PLI to deliver this FREE-to-all training.

Read "Deepfakes in Court: How Judges Can Proactively Manage Alleged AI-Generated Material in National Security Cases" now: legal-forum.uchicago.edu/print-archiv...

Abhishek Dalal, Chongyang Gao, the Hon. Paul W. Grimm (ret.), Maura R. Grossman, @danlinna.bsky.social, V.S. Subrahmanian, and the Hon. John Tunheim suggest how federal judges should approach evidence that may be AI-generated, focusing on the implications in a national security hypothetical.

Authors: Abhishek Dalal, Chongyang GAO, Hon. Paul Grimm (ret.), Maura R. Grossman, Daniel W. Linna Jr., Chiara Pulice, V.S. Subrahmanian, Hon. John Tunheim

#deepfake #artificialintelligence #ai #machinelearning #nationalsecurity #electionsecurity #uselections #Law4AI

We hope that our article proves to be an important, informative, and interesting read for judges, practitioners, students, and anyone interested in the intersection of computer science and law!

Our multidisciplinary team of authors includes judges, computer scientists, and lawyers. We discuss an election interference scenario, and the analysis is applicable for any scenario involving the admissibility of alleged deepfakes into evidence in a court proceeding.

#Deepfakes are coming to courts. How will judges deal with them? The Federal Rules of Evidence set a low bar for admissibility, yet allowing juries to see deepfakes could be unfairly prejudicial.

Our article is now in the University of Chicago Legal Forum:
legal-forum.uchicago.edu/print-archiv...