AI is essential for a strong economy because of its efficiency. It allows tasks and projects to be completed faster, increasing production and global trade. While the U.S. could remain an economic powerhouse without AI, the technology makes achieving and sustaining that status easier. #UWJ201 #301
16.04.2025 16:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
AI is a valuable technological advancement but should primarily be used in journalism to minimize and eliminate biases. Being neutral is one of journalism's greatest challenges, and AI can help by filtering out emotions and personal beliefs, ensuring reporting focuses solely on facts. #UWJ201 #301
16.04.2025 15:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The article on 4/16 stated, "AI will reshape the world in ways we canβt imagine, much as the printing press and the Internet did at their inceptions." I'd never considered AI in this way. Do you think AI is the final major influence on learning and writing, or will something new emerge? #UWJ201 #301
16.04.2025 15:24 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0
I think social proof is most effective for me because I want to know something is valued not just by celebrities, but also by everyday people. Scarcity is most effective on society as a whole since we place a lot of value on rare items and the idea of being one of the few who have them. #UWJ201 #301
09.04.2025 16:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I think it's not necessarily about political party affiliation, but rather whether you're exposing yourself to opposing viewpoints and consuming news from a variety of sources. If you're only getting news from one place, you're more likely to succumb to persuasion #UWJ201 #301
09.04.2025 16:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
On 4/7 we learned the difference between persuasion and manipulation -- how persuasion typically uses the best available information, while manipulation involves selective info. Do you think journalists sometimes intend to persuade but unintentionally use manipulative techniques? #UWJ201 #301
09.04.2025 16:02 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 8 π 0
The "news finds me" perception contributes to conspiratorial thinking because those who allow the news to come to them will rarely get the whole story or the whole truth. They just get a fraction of the news story and often that can create the spread of misinformation. #UWJ201 #301
09.04.2025 15:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I think preventing the spiral of silence requires people to not be afraid to have different views. I understand it may be scary for everyone to not agree with your opinions but it is even more important to stand up for yourself in those circumstances. #UWJ201 #301
09.04.2025 15:36 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The article "How media consumption patterns fuel conspiratorial thinking" shared factors that make people prone to conspiracism. It made me wonder: Why does false news travel faster than the truth online? Is it driven by consumer behavior, or by producers and their incentives? #UWJ201 #301
09.04.2025 15:32 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
I agree that bias is subjective. Often readers can sense the presence of bias in the media, even if it aligns with their views. If the media supports your perspective, you might overlook or accept the bias, but if it challenges your beliefs, bias becomes more apparent and frustrating. #UWJ201 #301
18.03.2025 04:39 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I sometimes unconsciously judge a personβs character based on their ideological beliefs, simply because values can strongly reflect who someone is. Some policy matters are too significant to overlook when evaluating someoneβs character, which is why ideological beliefs do matter. #UWJ201 #301
18.03.2025 04:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The article assigned for 3/19 explores the hostile media effect which occurs when both sides perceive a neutral story as biased against them. Do you think this effect has a greater impact on public trust in journalism compared to situations where only one side views a story as biased? #UWJ201 #301
18.03.2025 04:27 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I understand where you're coming from, but I believe it's not that people adapt to the events; rather, they return to who they were before the event. There's relatively little we can do for those struggling, as the challenge is more of an internal barrier they must overcome on their own.#UWJ201 #301
13.03.2025 23:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I think personal mindset plays a bigger role in achieving a "good life". Without a positive mindset, it's difficult to find contentment, as a negative outlook can keep you stuck in the same place in life. External factors are important but they serve more as a support. #UWJ201 #301
13.03.2025 23:05 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The article "What is the Good Life and How to Attain It" explores how the concept of "good" and the definition of a high quality of life vary from person to person. How can this idea apply to journalism, where online content influences our perceptions of what a "good life" really is? #UWJ201 #301
13.03.2025 22:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Both ideological news sources and social media contribute to polarization. Social media expands the divide by allowing individuals to share their strongest political views. Ideological news sources also play a role by prioritizing one perspective rather than presenting neutral coverage. #UWJ201 #301
03.03.2025 17:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Frequent exposure to short form content can be just as effective because limited news access on social media is better than no access to news at all. While it may not provide the depth of traditional reporting, it still helps people stay informed in a way that fits their daily habits. #UWJ201 #301
03.03.2025 17:06 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
One article suggests that people whose most common pathway to political and election news is through social media are less likely than others to be closely following that coverage. Could this be why many Americans have limited political knowledge, as we discussed in Mondayβs lecture? #UWJ201 #301
03.03.2025 16:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0
To combat time constraints, the media industry should standardize the use of short blurbs followed by full articles. This would allow for immediate coverage of breaking news while giving journalists the time to provide deeper context in follow-up articles and prevent rushed reporting. #UWJ201 #315
25.02.2025 22:21 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The policy someone supports depends on their values. 'Helping the environment' has a positive connotation, appealing to those who prioritize environmental improvement. In contrast, those less concerned with environmental issues may prefer 'preventing damage' due to its negative framing. #UWJ201 #301
25.02.2025 22:12 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Mondayβs lecture covered the problems with objectivity, connecting to episodic vs. thematic framing in "Five Problems with Your Protest Coverage". Itβs easier to appear objective when reporting events than addressing underlying issues. How does framing shape perceptions of objectivity? #UWJ201 #301
25.02.2025 21:48 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I believe digital media amplifies journalists' motivations. For example, the drive to break news first grows stronger as digital media allows information to spread instantly. Also, impressing sources becomes a greater incentive, as digital platforms make it easier to capture attention. #UWJ201 #301
20.02.2025 03:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I believe the world would be better off without framing, as it would reduce bias in the news we consume. People often present information in a way that aligns with their political beliefs, which can be upsetting and triggering for readers and audiences with different perspectives. #UWJ201 #301
20.02.2025 03:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The article "Scoops, Impact, or Glory: What Motivates Reporters?" explores the key driving forces behind journalists' work, as well as the potential risks these motivations can create. Do you think reporters are more influenced by intrinsic motivators or extrinsic motivators? and why? #UWJ201 #301
20.02.2025 03:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 3 π 0
This is a great question. I believe that combating the echo chamber is a personal responsibility. As members of society, individuals should make an effort to consume a diverse range of media rather than only engaging with content that aligns with their existing beliefs. #UWJ201 #301
12.02.2025 18:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
Yes, social media has the capacity to fill information gaps left by traditional news agendas. Social media platforms allow real-time updates and the amplification of voices mainstream media may overlook. It serves as a place to share perspectives that may not be presented on the news. #UWJ201 #301
12.02.2025 18:04 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
The article "Attention as a Valuable Resource" outlines seven categories of research on what drives individual attention to news. Is there one category that most strongly influences people's attention? Additionally, does the dominant category change depending on a person's environment? #UWJ201 #301
12.02.2025 17:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
This changes how we perceive media because when wealthy tech giants become key players, they gain control over content. Many tech owners have political views, which they may promote through the media they control. Because of this, tech platforms should face the same regulations. #UWJ201 #301
05.02.2025 20:33 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
I think vertical integration has a greater effect on the content shared on various platforms. Vertical integration allows the company to control the entire process, from production to distribution, leading to more consistent messaging and content strategies across platforms. #UWJ201 #301
05.02.2025 20:03 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
In the article "Who Owns the News?" I found it concerning that a record-high 39% of Americans have no confidence in mass media. I wonder if this decline in trust will push national news outlets to change how they provide information. How will the media adapt to regain public trust? #UWJ201 #301
05.02.2025 19:58 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0