's Avatar

@ginjaninja3716.bsky.social

59 Followers  |  64 Following  |  51 Posts  |  Joined: 07.11.2024  |  1.8765

Latest posts by ginjaninja3716.bsky.social on Bluesky

Well I hope you're having a GREAT day, king ❀️

13.11.2025 22:22 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If there was ever a sliver of doubt before, we are in the full throes of fascism.

18.09.2025 03:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

SOME FANTASTIC NEWS

15.08.2025 16:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It's what motivates me to wake up every day

07.08.2025 14:04 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My shaylaaa 😍

29.07.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
29.07.2025 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He's just chronically vain

17.07.2025 22:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 20.05.2025 21:30 β€” πŸ‘ 11416    πŸ” 2230    πŸ’¬ 200    πŸ“Œ 69

This is perfect

20.05.2025 18:02 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Video thumbnail

This is Gus. He has a superb puppy belly, and knows how to use it. 12/10 please enjoy

20.05.2025 16:39 β€” πŸ‘ 6085    πŸ” 373    πŸ’¬ 101    πŸ“Œ 26

She was really like "HERE, DAMN"

16.05.2025 18:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep, I'm still around! ❀️

16.05.2025 17:14 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm incredibly disappointed. πŸ˜”

16.05.2025 17:01 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 30.04.2025 11:14 β€” πŸ‘ 5893    πŸ” 1435    πŸ’¬ 109    πŸ“Œ 70
Post image 02.04.2025 14:21 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
DOJ directs prosecutors to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione
1 hour ago
CAH
CNN
Gunman who killed 23 in racist attack at Texas Walmart offered plea deal to avoid death penalty

DOJ directs prosecutors to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione 1 hour ago CAH CNN Gunman who killed 23 in racist attack at Texas Walmart offered plea deal to avoid death penalty

Huh, weird

01.04.2025 22:43 β€” πŸ‘ 16321    πŸ” 6194    πŸ’¬ 123    πŸ“Œ 224
Video thumbnail

This is Frank. He is the perfect example of why golden retrievers don't make good guard dogs. But they make wonderful welcome committees. 13/10 (TT: accordingtobelieve)

20.03.2025 22:34 β€” πŸ‘ 9854    πŸ” 1096    πŸ’¬ 215    πŸ“Œ 115

I've been watching this space for your response 🀣 IT'S SO BAD

10.03.2025 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I need your workout routine πŸ₯΅

10.03.2025 15:35 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Perhaps the most interesting moment in Trump's latest Instagram post

27.02.2025 02:53 β€” πŸ‘ 421    πŸ” 33    πŸ’¬ 23    πŸ“Œ 3
Post image

You first.

25.02.2025 20:53 β€” πŸ‘ 111528    πŸ” 14128    πŸ’¬ 5599    πŸ“Œ 1137

Was it not because the kitchen was, in fact, a nightmare?

26.02.2025 15:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Say "thank you, Joe Organa"

19.02.2025 22:25 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
The terms of the Executive Orders are extraordinarily vague and could prohibit
Plaintiffs from engaging in any targeted effort to help a specific group of people facing unfair disadvantages. The Executive Orders equate banned "DEIA" with any equity-related workβ€” potentially including work that is specifically authorized or required by civil rights laws-and explicitly prohibit references to "DEI and DEIA principles, under whatever name they may appear." Without any discernible standards or criteria of what is and what is not "dangerous, demeaning," "immoral," and "illegal" DEIA,' as understood by this Administration, the future of Plaintiffs' fiscal viability and programming are subject to the unfettered discretion of an
Administration that has made clear its predisposition against any speech or action that advances equal opportunity for historically marginalized groups, including people of color, women, LGBTQ people, and/or people with disabilities. Such vague terms without sufficient standards or criteria
deprive Plaintiffs of their due process rights under the Fifth Amendment.
9. In addition to violating Plaintiffs' free speech and due process rights, the Executive
Orders have a clear discriminatory purpose in violation of equal protection: to malign the targeted communities; to undermine and dismantle a wide spectrum of policies, programs, and activities intended to help historically marginalized, underserved, and under-resourced groups; and to erase
transgender people from public life.

The terms of the Executive Orders are extraordinarily vague and could prohibit Plaintiffs from engaging in any targeted effort to help a specific group of people facing unfair disadvantages. The Executive Orders equate banned "DEIA" with any equity-related workβ€” potentially including work that is specifically authorized or required by civil rights laws-and explicitly prohibit references to "DEI and DEIA principles, under whatever name they may appear." Without any discernible standards or criteria of what is and what is not "dangerous, demeaning," "immoral," and "illegal" DEIA,' as understood by this Administration, the future of Plaintiffs' fiscal viability and programming are subject to the unfettered discretion of an Administration that has made clear its predisposition against any speech or action that advances equal opportunity for historically marginalized groups, including people of color, women, LGBTQ people, and/or people with disabilities. Such vague terms without sufficient standards or criteria deprive Plaintiffs of their due process rights under the Fifth Amendment. 9. In addition to violating Plaintiffs' free speech and due process rights, the Executive Orders have a clear discriminatory purpose in violation of equal protection: to malign the targeted communities; to undermine and dismantle a wide spectrum of policies, programs, and activities intended to help historically marginalized, underserved, and under-resourced groups; and to erase transgender people from public life.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant the following relief:
A.
A declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Β§ 2201 that Executive Order Nos. 14151,
14168, and 14173 and any implementing agency actions are unlawful, unconstitutional, and
invalid.
A permanent injunction enjoining Defendants, their officials, agents, employees,
assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participating with them from implementing or enforcing Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173, including without limitation the promulgation of any rules or regulations, in any manner against Plaintiffs by way of contract,
subcontract, purchase order, grant, or sub-grant.
C. A permanent injunction mandating that Defendants permanently rescind all agency-wide directives implementing and effectuating Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173 against Plaintiffs that were issued prior to this injunction.
D. A permanent injunction mandating that Defendants unwind, rescind, strike, modify, or otherwise rectify contracts, subcontracts, agreements, and/or any other such binding documents
entered into with Plaintiffs, in which terms, clauses, or provisions have been inserted pursuant to
or in furtherance of Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173.

REQUEST FOR RELIEF Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant the following relief: A. A declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Β§ 2201 that Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173 and any implementing agency actions are unlawful, unconstitutional, and invalid. A permanent injunction enjoining Defendants, their officials, agents, employees, assigns, and all persons acting in concert or participating with them from implementing or enforcing Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173, including without limitation the promulgation of any rules or regulations, in any manner against Plaintiffs by way of contract, subcontract, purchase order, grant, or sub-grant. C. A permanent injunction mandating that Defendants permanently rescind all agency-wide directives implementing and effectuating Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173 against Plaintiffs that were issued prior to this injunction. D. A permanent injunction mandating that Defendants unwind, rescind, strike, modify, or otherwise rectify contracts, subcontracts, agreements, and/or any other such binding documents entered into with Plaintiffs, in which terms, clauses, or provisions have been inserted pursuant to or in furtherance of Executive Order Nos. 14151, 14168, and 14173.

BREAKING: Nonprofits sue over Trump's anti-diversity, anti-trans executive orders, alleging they violate the First Amendment & equal protection guarantees, are void for vagueness, exceed the president's authority, & violate the Administrative Procedure Act. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

19.02.2025 17:05 β€” πŸ‘ 3444    πŸ” 970    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 45

It should fucking not????? Are they fucking stupid (rhetorical question, of course they are)???

17.02.2025 20:16 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Everything is terrible and I hate it here and I want to crawl into a hole for the next 4 years

14.02.2025 19:53 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You're literally perfect it's not fair 😭πŸ”₯

13.02.2025 14:52 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Elon and Trump in Oval Office

Elon and Trump in Oval Office

Wormtongue and Theoden LOTR

Wormtongue and Theoden LOTR

It's definitely this vibe.

12.02.2025 08:29 β€” πŸ‘ 383    πŸ” 52    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 6

Please take a moment for this very critical update

05.02.2025 20:29 β€” πŸ‘ 8235    πŸ” 659    πŸ’¬ 115    πŸ“Œ 24

@ginjaninja3716 is following 17 prominent accounts