Social media ban could be one of the first steps towards regulation of social media platforms and could result in regulation for Ai and tech power,if this goes well then people would appreciate Australia and its contribution for creating much safer environment for all social media users under 16’s.

I agree, with the fact that it could unintentionally push then towards chat gpt or other unregulated A.I platforms because it doesn’t have any age restrictions and it can answer anything asked so it could be dangerous for under 16’s to have access to such tools in early years of childhood.

Well, it can be considered necessary as of now technology should be limited to teens or under 16’s because they may get exposed to something illegal,dangerous and adult content which could be traumatising for some kids or completely change their perspective of life about some certain topics.

Does Australia’s social media ban for under-16s strike the right balance between protecting young people and preserving access to online communities and information?

Does Australia’s social media ban for under-16s strike the right balance between protecting young people and preserving access to online communities and information?

Australia launches a social media ban – and is AI a bubble about to pop? Under-16s to be banned from social media in Australia, and analysts continue to monitor the massive investment in AI

www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

The good, bad, and ugly: CBSE's audio-video surveillance directive for schools With the aim of strengthening safety measures on school campuses, the CBSE recently issued a directive making it mandatory for all affiliated schools to install

www.newindianexpress.com/kerala/2025/...
#UCWCOMM150

Although Public safety is the main priority of police officers but if someone is immediate threat then they can easily be neutralised through AI- powered facial recognition and prevent any mass casualties.

It could be biased against certain groups and may hurt their sentiments because some communities do not like to be recorded and see it as a threat and start acting violently.

Should police use AI-powered facial recognition on body cameras given the privacy, bias, and civil liberties concerns it raises?

AI-powered police body cameras, once taboo, get tested on Canadian city's 'watch list' of faces Police in Edmonton, Canada, have started a pilot project using AI-equipped body cameras to detect faces on a "high risk" watch list.

apnews.com/article/ai-f...

I do agree with this question, privacy and human rights are very sensitive issues when it comes to surveillance because they may violate them either directly or indirectly.

I agree with the question, everyone has right to their privacy and freedom and invisible surveillance violates their right’s.

I completely agree with the question as facial recognition is more convenient source of surveillance.

Should U.S. tech companies be held responsible for enabling China’s extensive surveillance systems that can be used for human rights abuses?

PHOTO ESSAY: Invisible infrared surveillance technology and those caught in its digital cage When you unlock a phone, step into view of a security camera or drive past a license plate reader at night, beams of infrared light - invisible to the naked eye — shine onto the unique contours of you...

apnews.com/photo-essay/... ESSAY: Invisible infrared surveillance technology and those caught in its digital cage
#UCWCOMM150
@houmanmehrabian.bsky.social

#UCWCOMM150