Thank you for all the support and reposts!
We've gotten a steady stream of inquiries and submissions for this competition, but also some ANXIETY that the window will close before people have a chance to submit.
We're nowhere near that! We'll update on here when we've allocated 50% of the capacity.
19.02.2026 16:27 β
π 19
π 10
π¬ 0
π 0
As usual, PECE is the day before APSA. We have a great venue and aim to showcase some of the most exciting research in this area.
Please share and let me know if you have questions!
Organized this year by:
Amanda Kennard, Dustin Tingley, and me!
19.02.2026 15:32 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Announcing the 2026 Political Economy of Climate and Environment (PECE) Conference!
When: 9/2/2026
Where: Harvard
CFP: www.pece-conference.org/cambridge-20...
Submit your papers or apply to attend: forms.gle/6y7YUoxJ6HTsz4cy8
Sponsored by @weatherheadcenter.bsky.social and the Sala Institute
19.02.2026 15:32 β
π 6
π 4
π¬ 1
π 0
@cesarbmartinez.bsky.social has some working papers in this area
07.02.2026 16:06 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Research - Dr. Anthony Calacino
@acalacino.bsky.social has one here: anthonycalacino.com/research
07.02.2026 15:59 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 2
π 0
@guygrossman.bsky.social I will send you a new one when we post it next week!
07.02.2026 15:57 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
π Great review of climate papers published in 2025 !!
11.01.2026 00:23 β
π 7
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
Abadie Diamond and Hainmueller
Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of Californiaβs Tobacco Control Program
18.11.2025 22:09 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
You can read find more about details at www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/... Thanks to all that helped along the way!
09.07.2025 10:16 β
π 7
π 2
π¬ 0
π 1
Omg I did this in graduate school and it was the worst.
09.05.2025 19:40 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Met @annaleen.bsky.social and got to spend some good time talking science and spec-fic and they were even more amazing and brilliant than I expected. They had just thought deeply about such interesting and important things and knew how to say things in exactly the right way.
04.05.2025 23:13 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
π
29.03.2025 10:25 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
If your research involves RD designs, check out this important new working paper from Ghosh, Imbens, and Wager: "PLRD: Partially Linear Regression Discontinuity Inference" arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09907
18.03.2025 14:37 β
π 9
π 3
π¬ 0
π 0
Watching Jurassic Park, where a computer nerd with a debt problem and delusions of grandeur tears down all the safety systems, with no understanding of the consequences, so he can better facilitate his planned espionage and theft.
15.03.2025 03:21 β
π 10463
π 2448
π¬ 214
π 148
Trumpβs environmental rule-shredding will put lives at risk, ex-EPA heads say
Former agency leaders, including two Republicans, say rollbacks by Lee Zeldin could cause βsevere harmsβ
If Vladimir Putin had a plan to foul our air and water, wreck public health and drive America over the cliff of irreversible lethal climate change, it would look exactly like Lee Zeldinβs plan. This is a plan for self-inflicted environmental disaster.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...
16.03.2025 13:04 β
π 3265
π 1274
π¬ 154
π 51
Here's what that image was supposed to look like:
18.03.2025 00:12 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
satellite scanning trees on a hillside vs trees on flat ground, observing more trees in the hill than on the flat
We went for roads since it's easy to see how that measurement error could arise. Often we have no idea why RS + ML errors occur
18.03.2025 00:10 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
@bstewart.bsky.social and co-authors explore the same issue in text measurement models like LLMs and find something similar--even small measurement errors can lead to large biases in downstream causal tasks when they aren't orthogonal to treatment
18.03.2025 00:10 β
π 4
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Imagine you run a land tenure reform RCT, DV is tree cover. It turns out your treatment also causes more irrigated ag, which is mis-classified as treecover more often than rainfed ag (year-round greenness). Estimated treatment effect will be > that true treatment effect.
18.03.2025 00:10 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
While that's our running example for the paper, definitely a broader issue here. We think assuming no correlation between measurement error and treatment is akin to the selection on observables assumption we usually require extraordinary evidence to believe. A couple examples below:
18.03.2025 00:10 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
@jonproctor.bsky.social @vivianodavide.bsky.social @bstewart.bsky.social and others I can't find tags for
17.03.2025 19:36 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
#css #econometrics #EconSky #poli-sci #eo #remotesensing
17.03.2025 19:32 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Parameter Recovery Using Remotely Sensed Variables
Founded in 1920, the NBER is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to conducting economic research and to disseminating research findings among academics, public policy makers, an...
9/9
Other great work in this area: www.nber.org/papers/w30861, arxiv.org/abs/2501.18577, arxiv.org/abs/2411.10959, arxiv.org/abs/2306.04746 focus on βpredict-then-debiasββthe right move if using off the shelf data. But if youβre training the ML model yourself, give our adversarial approach a try!
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 2
π 1
8/9
Reach out if you want to debias some measurements in a particular application!
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
a cartoon of spongebob giving the thumbs up with the words too easy below him
ALT: a cartoon of spongebob giving the thumbs up with the words too easy below him
7/9
Itβs easy to plug in any causal variable that might bias your ML-driven proxy. The adversary directly leverages your labeled dataβso if youβre building custom measurement models with large-scale images (or text), you just tack on the adversary, retrain, and your bias vanishes.
8/9
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
6/9
We then use a labeled forest cover data from high-resolution imagery. When comparing the ML predictions to ground-truth labels, a naive model under-estimates forest cover near roads. Our adversarial model, by contrast, recovers unbiased estimates, giving more reliable coefficients.
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
5/9
We induce measurement error bias in a simulation of the effect of roads on forest cover. We show that a naive model yields biased estimates of this relationship, while an adversarial model gets it right.
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
4/9
We also introduce a simple bias test: regress the ML prediction errors on your independent variable. If nonzero, you have measurement error bias. If you run that test while gathering ground-truth data, you can estimate how many labeled observations youβll need to reject a target amount of bias.
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
algorithm for an adversarial debiasing model, including the primary model, the adversarial model, and the estimation model
3/9
Hereβs how: a primary model predicts the outcome, while an adversarial model tries to predict the treatment using the prediction errors. As the adversary learns how to predict treatment, the primary model learns to make predictions where the errors contain no information about the treatment.
17.03.2025 19:30 β
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0