www.facebook.com/share.php?u=...

All I see is…Fuq y’all when I see this smug ass look on his face

youtube.com/watch?v=o9m1...

Yeah we know what’s up with that…And exactly what that means…First off he wants people to watch that 💩show of an inauguration & I most certainly will not & They’re in his pocket now along with Zuckerberg…They have no shame

I’m not sure what’s going on…But after reading your post…I checked,I have no idea what’s happening but mine is up

By 1837, 23,000 Muscogee people had been forced out of the Southeast.

that their veneration for their own law and customs will induce them speedily to remove to that region of the country west of Mississippi."

argued for the passage of the 1832 law by specifically noting that when the Muscogee people "see and feel some palpable act of legislation under the authority of the state,

Both the Alabama and federal government hoped to remove tribal communities from Alabama to the Western Territory and this law furthered those aims. Indeed, Dixon Hall Lewis, an Alabama House representative,

and those intending to illegally occupy tribal lands were enticed by the law preventing any suit for trespass by Muscogee people and traveled to Muscogee territory in Alabama to take advantage of the law, stealing land without consequence.

effectively ensuring that Muscogee people defrauded and illegally deprived of their land by white intruders would have no recourse in the Alabama courts. White settlers, speculators,

The 1832 law also provided that Cherokee and Muscogee people could only testify in court in suits involving other members of the Cherokee and Muscogee nations,

Punishment for violating this law was imprisonment "in the common jail of the proper county, for not less than two, nor more than four, months.”

This 1832 law frustrated those efforts by declaring it illegal for tribal leaders to "meet in any counsel, assembly, or convention" and create "any law for said tribe, contrary to the laws and constitution of this State.

Even without federal support, many Muscogee people refused to succumb to mounting pressure to emigrate west of the Mississippi River, and their leaders continued organizing efforts to secure their tribal lands.

In response to that first law and white settlers' increasing unlawful encroachment into the Muscogee Nation, the Muscogee Council repeatedly—yet unsuccessfully—petitioned the federal government for assistance and protection.

to the constitution and laws of this State, be, and the same are hereby abolished."

This statute was created just three years after another law effectively extended the jurisdiction of Alabama into Muscogee territory.

Alabama law. The provision stated, "All laws, usages and customs now used, enjoyed, or practiced, by the Creek and Cherokee nations of Indians, within the limits of this State, contrary

On January 16, 1832, in an effort designed to make aspects of daily life illegal and drive Muscogee (Creek) and Cherokee people from their land through abuse and fraud, the General Assembly of Alabama enacted provisions prohibiting them from practicing customs or making laws that conflicted with

"conditions likely to inflict the stigmatic injury condemned in Brown." Justice Marshall argued that by reaching its decision, “the majority today suggests that 13 years of desegregation was enough.”

Justice Thurgood Marshall—who argued and won the Brown case in 1954—wrote a dissent, joined by Justices Harry Blackmun and John Paul Stevens, arguing that a desegregation decree should not be lifted when doing so recreates segregated

Despite troubling evidence that Oklahoma City schools were resegregating under the district's new plan, the Court sent the case back to the lower federal court for assessment under a less stringent standard, which ultimately permitted the school board to proceed with the new plan.

On January 15, 1991, the Court declared in a 5-3 decision written by Chief Justice William Rehnquist that federal desegregation injunctions were intended to be temporary.

Local parents of Black students initiated litigation challenging the new assignment plan and asking for reinstatement of the 1972 busing decree. In 1989, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reinstituted the decree, and the school board appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

In 1984, the school board adopted a new student assignment plan that significantly reduced busing and resegregated Oklahoma City schools.

The school board complied for five years and then filed a motion to lift the order. The federal court found that integration had been achieved, granted the motion, and ended the busing program.

In 1972, a federal court ordered the Board of Education of Oklahoma City Schools to adopt a busing program to desegregate the city's public schools in compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court's desegregation decision in Brown v. Board of Education.

On January 15, 1991, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion lifting a lower court’s desegregation decree and authorizing Oklahoma City schools to resegregate into de facto one-race schools.

YouTube video by 2RawTooReal Entertainment The TikTok CEO and Donald Trump are in cahoots

youtube.com/shorts/rUS4S...

Although I wasn’t a big creator on TikTok…I just posted things that happened throughout history…I will miss the creators that I crossed paths with..Im unaware of all the platforms that they’ll be on next