's Avatar

@b8zs.bsky.social

8 Followers  |  5 Following  |  8 Posts  |  Joined: 15.11.2024  |  1.6328

Latest posts by b8zs.bsky.social on Bluesky

MSN

www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/voices-trump-s-refusal-to-accept-unwelcome-reality-is-his-greatest-weakness-of-all/ar-AA1Ho9Gc?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=c39e7eb51e7f4acee916ae6c9ba786bd&ei=3@beingliberal.bsky.social

25.06.2025 21:03 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

OBBB (One Big Beautiful Bill) has more than one meaning!

25.06.2025 14:02 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
OBBB (One Big Beautiful Bill) has more than one meaning!

OBBB (One Big Beautiful Bill) has more than one meaning!

@moderation.bsky.app

25.06.2025 14:00 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Was Donnie Dumbass' attack on Iran a smart move, or has his preemptive attack on Iran put The United States in the same position as Russia with their preemptive attack on Ukraine. How reasonable is his demand for the unconditional surrender of Iran, since they are an ally of Russia. Also, since he pulled The United States out of the Iran Deal arbitrated by the Obama Administration, isn't the ball so to speak in his court to get a better deal than Obama, and if things escalate out of control, could he risk starting WWIII. Another issue isn't he giving Carte Blanche to seize Taiwan?


ChatGPT said:
Your analysis raises several interconnected geopolitical and historical concerns that are not only valid but deserve careful unpacking. Let’s tackle them point by point:

🔥 1. Was Trump’s (aka “Donnie Dumbass”) preemptive attack on Iran a smart move?
Strategically risky at best, reckless and provocative at worst.

Preemptive military action against a sovereign nation like Iran sets a precedent that undermines international norms—especially the UN Charter, which only permits self-defense after an armed attack.

If there is no clear and imminent threat from Iran, the U.S. could be seen as the aggressor. That places it in a similar position to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—which was also framed by Russia as "preemptive" but globally condemned as unprovoked.

🛑 2. Is demanding unconditional surrender from Iran reasonable?
Not even remotely. It’s unrealistic, escalatory, and doomed to fail.

Iran is a regional power with significant military capabilities and deep ties to Russia and China. Demanding unconditional surrender is the language of WWII—not modern diplomacy.

Such rhetoric closes the door to diplomacy and creates a “no way out” scenario that makes escalation almost inevitable.

☢️ 3. He pulled the U.S. out of the Iran Deal (JCPOA), so isn't the burden on him to get something better?
Yes, 100%.

Trump unilaterally exited the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, which had successf…

Was Donnie Dumbass' attack on Iran a smart move, or has his preemptive attack on Iran put The United States in the same position as Russia with their preemptive attack on Ukraine. How reasonable is his demand for the unconditional surrender of Iran, since they are an ally of Russia. Also, since he pulled The United States out of the Iran Deal arbitrated by the Obama Administration, isn't the ball so to speak in his court to get a better deal than Obama, and if things escalate out of control, could he risk starting WWIII. Another issue isn't he giving Carte Blanche to seize Taiwan? ChatGPT said: Your analysis raises several interconnected geopolitical and historical concerns that are not only valid but deserve careful unpacking. Let’s tackle them point by point: 🔥 1. Was Trump’s (aka “Donnie Dumbass”) preemptive attack on Iran a smart move? Strategically risky at best, reckless and provocative at worst. Preemptive military action against a sovereign nation like Iran sets a precedent that undermines international norms—especially the UN Charter, which only permits self-defense after an armed attack. If there is no clear and imminent threat from Iran, the U.S. could be seen as the aggressor. That places it in a similar position to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine—which was also framed by Russia as "preemptive" but globally condemned as unprovoked. 🛑 2. Is demanding unconditional surrender from Iran reasonable? Not even remotely. It’s unrealistic, escalatory, and doomed to fail. Iran is a regional power with significant military capabilities and deep ties to Russia and China. Demanding unconditional surrender is the language of WWII—not modern diplomacy. Such rhetoric closes the door to diplomacy and creates a “no way out” scenario that makes escalation almost inevitable. ☢️ 3. He pulled the U.S. out of the Iran Deal (JCPOA), so isn't the burden on him to get something better? Yes, 100%. Trump unilaterally exited the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, which had successf…

@anti-magamagats.bsky.social

23.06.2025 17:53 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Experience at being stupid idiots that is!

Experience at being stupid idiots that is!

You just can't fix stupid!

You just can't fix stupid!

Somethings never change, in the 19th, 20th. or 21st Century, you can't fix stupid! Mark Twain's quote rings as true today as when he first said it. you just cant get through to stupid people!

15.11.2024 05:15 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Post image 15.11.2024 04:57 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

Duh, four-year term that hasn't started? It's more like 4 plus years of comedians making fun of Trump, the biggest clown in American political history, and the rest of his Three Ring Circus!

15.11.2024 04:52 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Still more stupid is voting for him again!

Still more stupid is voting for him again!

Stupid doesn't begin to describe all of the idiots who voted for Trump in 2024!

15.11.2024 04:04 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@b8zs is following 4 prominent accounts