The big reveal starts. #escmidglobal
12.04.2025 14:20 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The big reveal starts. #escmidglobal
12.04.2025 14:20 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Following up, Gunnar also shows the problems with the screening tests. It's a challenge in high R area #escmidglobal #escmid2025
12.04.2025 07:44 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Totally agree, not sure why it's that relevant.... (Or we could just repeat the test?)
12.04.2025 07:40 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Gunnar from EUCAST talking about the complexities of susceptibility testing using oxacillin disc screening. #escmid2025
12.04.2025 07:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It zero shots stuff in R, complex plots with in built linear models, saves to a pdf, everything works. Incredible for simulations.
25.02.2025 18:01 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
NEW PREPRINT!
Enjoyed working with @tom-parks.bsky.social and @petedodd24.bsky.social on immortal time bias
In its simplest form, ITB results from misallocation of person time, i.e. pre treatment time in intervention group being counted as time on treatment
www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...
[1/n]
Ah thanks I should have done this!
23.12.2024 10:01 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
We are looking for patient, clinician and researcher insight into priorities for community acquired pneumonia!
This is a JLA Priority Setting Partnership and will drive the UK research agenda for years to come - please share!!
⛄🎄⛄🎄!!
forms.office.com/Pages/Respon...
Just a short piece on FQ prescribing. Basically, it's gone downhill, in relation to comparator antibiotics and absolutely. Still waiting for the MHRA to release the report with new information...
21.12.2024 19:31 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0
NEW LETTER! Me and @gushamilton.bsky.social argue that, if you want to demonstrate all oral treatment for pneumonia is adequate, then systematically excluding from sample people who are switched to IV after failing oral therapy is problematic
www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S119...
No... But they offer a great service generally!
12.12.2024 23:07 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Just really cool.
11.12.2024 22:36 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What an absolutely lovely paper. Important topic. I wonder what it would cost today and how much the total cost was. Such a lovely bit of work. Will keep this for talks and presentations.
11.12.2024 22:30 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0As in, we think shorter is better. So why would there be increased harm with a day less antibiotics? I just can't really square it with e.g. balance. And the CRP arm mortality was about the same as PCT arm. I think it's just small numbers.
11.12.2024 06:20 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I thought about this but I think it's just a bit too imprecise and I think the mechanism for increased mortality is not really there. So I *think* we are just seeing noise.
11.12.2024 06:15 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0regardless, a very, very impressive trial and well run. Congrats to all authors! @darknatter.bsky.social
10.12.2024 15:54 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I don't think you can easily claim that PCT reduces abx use but that the mortality is the same. It's just too imprecise to call mortality. We can't infer much about the effect on mortality. I am not sure the NI margin is what patients/clinicians would accept.
10.12.2024 15:53 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Interesting trial. If we took the point estimates, then we would accept 0.9 days less abx per person, for a 1.6% absolute mortality increase. Not sure I would take that. Obviously, imprecision means both of these are less precise; but I think not a clear 'win' for PCT
jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...
I saw one just this week! If only you'd published it last week...
10.12.2024 07:20 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Don't
I've got too much to do
I definitely think this is underexplored. lots of appropriate datasets in which to study this. Very interesting!
03.12.2024 21:03 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Colin, wouldn't one analysis compare different ages as we know drinking has reduced in younger people. So if we see larger effects in younger folk makes less likely to be alcohol related.
03.12.2024 15:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This is lovely work Paul. Lovely. We are just thinking about in vitro systems and phages and how to start testing this systematically. Such interesting data. Thanks for sharing.
02.12.2024 19:49 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This must be in party diagnosis of fatty liver and increased use of e.g. fibroscans that pick up these. But not a hematologist or an epidemiologist. But I can't quite tie it together.
02.12.2024 15:53 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0And what a paper to choose ;)
02.12.2024 15:51 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Not gonna disagree with a Nobel prize winner on the economics here, but people underestimate Trump and the power being crazy has. If people think he will do something crazy, they change their behaviour in funny ways(and sometimes in his favour). I don't think it's a rational play, that's the point.
01.12.2024 18:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yes I meant to do tom too then fat fingered and not used to blue sky!
01.12.2024 13:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Although I suppose cough is biology 🤣
01.12.2024 13:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0What's the best book for understanding LLMs and their ilk? I understand basic statistics and computing (i.e. I can use bash, python, and HPC clusters). So something that works from there upwards. Like explains transformers.
01.12.2024 13:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh and I would love to see more about the smoking association. MVMR would seem super interesting here. Lots to think about. I always wonder about increased diagnosis in smokers due to cough as well as actual biology. Can't wait to see new preprint!
01.12.2024 13:21 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0