Kelly Digges's Avatar

Kelly Digges

@kellydigges.bsky.social

Worldbuilder, editor, and narrative designer for games. Principal Narrative Designer for Riot's Riftbound TCG. Formerly worked on Magic, Lorcana, Concord, Gods Unchained. I killed Lorthos and I'd do it again. He/him

676 Followers  |  920 Following  |  308 Posts  |  Joined: 06.08.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Kelly Digges (@kellydigges.bsky.social)

Notice how there’s not even a fig leaf hereβ€”not even an attempt to appear as though this helps anyone or keeps anyone safe. This is pure persecution, and it’s what all this anti-trans shit has always been about. Protect trans vs people any way you can, folks.

26.02.2026 17:41 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

We literally know now that anti-trans legislation was pushed by a pedophile ring to allow a pedophile ring to serve a pedophile ring’s interests, and legislators have decided the best course of action is to keep doing what the pedophile ring wants.

26.02.2026 10:53 β€” πŸ‘ 6310    πŸ” 2718    πŸ’¬ 31    πŸ“Œ 37

I really hate anti-trans politicians, and I especially hate it because it was a culture war issue where we were clearly winning and then a bunch of nominally liberal people at the Times and the Atlantic decided to reverse that and they did.

26.02.2026 01:57 β€” πŸ‘ 2389    πŸ” 584    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 17

Also we uh, we didn’t print them. They came printed. In the Duelist Magazine. πŸ’€

25.02.2026 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah, absolutely not, lol. When those came out we passed them around, with this sense that… like, that’s what we’d REALLY been doing all along, we just didn’t know it. I do think we learned a little from them and may have consulted them occasionally, but mostly they were a curio

25.02.2026 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yep, second this. We weren’t sitting there with the infamous rat-maze diagrams or anything, but we understood when you could respond and when you no longer could.

25.02.2026 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
The photo shows four images of the same Roman iron stylus (pen) one below the other, with knib to the left. This stylus is octagonal in shape, with an inscription dot-punched along its length on four alternate sides. The stylus is 132 mm long and 5 mm thick, and the letters are circa 2 mm high. The four images of the pen show the four lines of inscribed text (highlighted) which read:

β€˜ab urbe v[e]n[i] munus tibi gratum adf(e)ro
acul[eat]um ut habe[a]s memor[ia]m nostra(m)
rogo si fortuna dar[e]t quo possem
largius ut longa via ceu sacculus est (v)acuus’

Translated as

β€˜I have come from the City. I bring you a welcome gift
with a sharp point that you may remember me.
I ask, if fortune allowed, that I might be able (to give)
as generously as the way is long (and) as my purse is empty.’

This inscription is generally interpreted by scholars as a humorous, tongue-in-cheek acknowledgment by the giver of the cheapness of the gift. 

The pen was used to write on wax-filled wooden writing tablets. Found in London (Roman β€˜Londinium’) by MOLA, during excavations for Bloomberg’s European Headquarters in 2010–2014 . Photo by Juan Jose Fuldain for MOLA

The photo shows four images of the same Roman iron stylus (pen) one below the other, with knib to the left. This stylus is octagonal in shape, with an inscription dot-punched along its length on four alternate sides. The stylus is 132 mm long and 5 mm thick, and the letters are circa 2 mm high. The four images of the pen show the four lines of inscribed text (highlighted) which read: β€˜ab urbe v[e]n[i] munus tibi gratum adf(e)ro acul[eat]um ut habe[a]s memor[ia]m nostra(m) rogo si fortuna dar[e]t quo possem largius ut longa via ceu sacculus est (v)acuus’ Translated as β€˜I have come from the City. I bring you a welcome gift with a sharp point that you may remember me.
I ask, if fortune allowed, that I might be able (to give) as generously as the way is long (and) as my purse is empty.’ This inscription is generally interpreted by scholars as a humorous, tongue-in-cheek acknowledgment by the giver of the cheapness of the gift. The pen was used to write on wax-filled wooden writing tablets. Found in London (Roman β€˜Londinium’) by MOLA, during excavations for Bloomberg’s European Headquarters in 2010–2014 . Photo by Juan Jose Fuldain for MOLA

Timeless humour!

A 2,000 year-old Roman souvenir pen with a joke inscription roughly equivalent to:

β€œI went to Rome and all I got you was this cheap pen!" πŸ˜‚

Dated circa 70 AD, this iron stylus pen was recovered in London during excavations by MOLA. πŸ“· Juan Jose Fuldain/MOLA

#Archaeology

21.02.2026 09:41 β€” πŸ‘ 1516    πŸ” 518    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 51
Wikipedia entry for dinkus

In typography, a dinkus is a typographic device or convention that typically consists of three spaced asterisks or bullet symbols in a horizontal row, e.g.   βˆ— βˆ— βˆ—   or   β€’ β€’ β€’  . The device has a variety of uses, and it usually denotes an intentional omission or a logical "break" of varying degree in a written work. This latter use is similar to a subsection, and it indicates that the subsequent text should be re-contextualized. Such a dinkus typically appears centrally aligned on a line of its own with vertical spacing before and after the device. The dinkus has been in use in various forms since c. 1850.[1][2] Historically, the dinkus was often represented as an asterism, ⁂, though this has fallen out of favor and is now nearly obsolete.

Wikipedia entry for dinkus In typography, a dinkus is a typographic device or convention that typically consists of three spaced asterisks or bullet symbols in a horizontal row, e.g.   βˆ— βˆ— βˆ—   or   β€’ β€’ β€’  . The device has a variety of uses, and it usually denotes an intentional omission or a logical "break" of varying degree in a written work. This latter use is similar to a subsection, and it indicates that the subsequent text should be re-contextualized. Such a dinkus typically appears centrally aligned on a line of its own with vertical spacing before and after the device. The dinkus has been in use in various forms since c. 1850.[1][2] Historically, the dinkus was often represented as an asterism, ⁂, though this has fallen out of favor and is now nearly obsolete.

perennial reminder that this typographic thing:

* * *

is called a "dinkus"

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinkus

18.02.2026 23:42 β€” πŸ‘ 269    πŸ” 94    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 7

Unironically yes, LOWER DECKS is about how the response to the disappointments of the post-Cold War era and the complexity of the modern world should not be despair or cynicism but instead a recommitment to the original ideals of liberalism, thank you for coming to my TED talk.

13.02.2026 19:08 β€” πŸ‘ 967    πŸ” 157    πŸ’¬ 16    πŸ“Œ 7

The fact that we don’t even see the conversation with Chakotay, just hear about it secondhand, is WILD

09.02.2026 06:42 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Incredibly special bit of Magic history here, up for auction to benefit a great cause

06.02.2026 07:03 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I appreciate that this makes him sound like an urban UK cryptid

06.02.2026 06:57 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

How am I one of the people who did not know that about Strefan Maurer

03.02.2026 19:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Googled it… what in the hell did I just read

31.01.2026 02:49 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Honestly: I saw the image before I read the text and thought β€œThat’s an interesting riff on Harry.” I would say he’s too close

30.01.2026 17:16 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Me too! I just figured she’d filmed the first part like a year earlier

30.01.2026 08:03 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh damn, living that clever memeticist life for real!

29.01.2026 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Lieutenant Liz LeFevre pfp is such a choice, I love it

29.01.2026 15:50 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

"The secret fear of the morally depraved is that virtue is actually common, and that they’re the ones who are alone."

27.01.2026 15:59 β€” πŸ‘ 188    πŸ” 48    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Rad, thanks!

26.01.2026 16:44 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I saw someone on Reddit claim that the Simpsons riffed on the famous Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film β€œright after it came out.” That footage was made public in 1967.

24.01.2026 20:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My good Gogginses and Goslings, Cumberbatches and Hiddlestons,

22.01.2026 07:31 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

hey I like that we're all posting thru it but I also wanted to say, in case anybody else is feeling it, that I'm pretty scared and genuinely think that we've passed a real rubicon in the past week or so and that being at the mercy of a handful of dumbfuck lunatics really does a number on your soul.

20.01.2026 20:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2889    πŸ” 513    πŸ’¬ 67    πŸ“Œ 39

Preach it, dust jackets suck

18.01.2026 02:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
tweet from a bluesky dev reading: I had claude do cashtags in the background while I was on a zoom call, it took about 15 minutes. I don’t think he could do the same for private accounts

tweet from a bluesky dev reading: I had claude do cashtags in the background while I was on a zoom call, it took about 15 minutes. I don’t think he could do the same for private accounts

Yeah, I saw this going around and had a β€œnone of these words are in the Bible” moment. Like I know what claude is, I looked up what cashtags are, still had no idea what was going on

16.01.2026 04:00 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

It took ten minutes, but I have now deciphered this skeet so I can be properly appalled by it

16.01.2026 03:50 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh, is THAT what that skeet meant?? Wowwwww

16.01.2026 03:49 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
From the 40kmemes community on Reddit: "Gotta catch em' all " ahh Explore this post and more from the 40kmemes community

Found it! This is great, I’d never seen it before www.reddit.com/r/40kmemes/s...

11.01.2026 19:17 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Wait, HE ALSO WRITES ABOUT WORLD WAR I?? I was wrong, that’s even more up my alley

11.01.2026 05:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

That could not be more up my alley

11.01.2026 05:58 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0