Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly's Avatar

Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly

@innovation.bsky.social

Mostly on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/misha-teplitskiy

3,125 Followers  |  1,405 Following  |  111 Posts  |  Joined: 03.07.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Misha Teplitskiy | Science of science | on LinkedIn mostly (@innovation.bsky.social)

Post image

A nice reminder that it's hard to know how often simultaneous discoveries happen in science. Any measures based on scholarly literature will be severe undercounts due to secrecy or simply unpublished work

18.01.2026 04:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
After science Twenty-five years ago, Ted Chiang wrote a prescient science fiction short that began: โ€œIt has been 25 years since a report of original research was last submitted to our editors for publication, makin...

New piece w/ James Evans in Science explores what we call 'science after science', an era where our ability to control nature may exceed our ability to understand it; a new struggle to sustain curiosity & understanding under AI's predictive dominance. #ai #science

www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

14.11.2025 18:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 25    ๐Ÿ” 10    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Title and author info of PNAS paper linked

Title and author info of PNAS paper linked

Now published at PNAS โ€ผ๏ธ w/ @innovation.bsky.social

How does peer reviewer diversity affect fairness in peer review and the direction of published science? We find a "geographical representation bias" in 60 STEM journals published by @ioppublishing.bsky.social.

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

14.08.2025 17:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 23    ๐Ÿ” 6    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Stack of papers and books

Stack of papers and books

This paper explores academic peer review as a source of knowledge transfer and learning for the reviewers themselves.
spkl.io/63328A1crC
@innovation.bsky.social @jamesmzd.bsky.social

23.07.2025 15:00 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Bad news for economists...

21.07.2025 09:15 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 64    ๐Ÿ” 9    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Fewer women amplify their scientific voices online A new University of Michigan study finds that women are about 28% less likely than men to promote their scientific papers on X (formerly Twitter)โ€”a seemingly minor digital decision that could have big...

Wow - an important read for #academicsky #scisky #medsky, about a study on professional social media activity by female scientists vs male, performed using @altmetric.com data from 2013-2018 (so, pre-Bluesky)

Summary: news.umich.edu/fewer-women-...
Paper: www.nature.com/articles/s41...

07.07.2025 17:48 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 111    ๐Ÿ” 41    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 5    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Post image

Do you remember Francesca Gino's claim on her website that HBS analyzed the "wrong data file" in their investigation, and that a "real file" proved her innocence?

HBS is now claiming that the "real file" was fabricated by Gino... and thus that Gino's claim was defamatory.

08.07.2025 13:06 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 83    ๐Ÿ” 16    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 6
Preview
AN INDEX TO GETTING AHEAD (Published 1981)

www.nytimes.com/1981/04/26/a...

07.07.2025 15:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

In 1981 NYT published a piece on the then-new citation index, and how it was being used "unintentionally" for performance evaluations

07.07.2025 15:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Title page of "Learning by Evaluating"

Title page of "Learning by Evaluating"

Probability of citing manuscript within 3 years, by review status. Reviewers are more than twice as likely to cite reviewed paper in future work compared to invited reviewers who declined due to unavailability.

Probability of citing manuscript within 3 years, by review status. Reviewers are more than twice as likely to cite reviewed paper in future work compared to invited reviewers who declined due to unavailability.

๐ŸฎNEW WORKING PAPER ALERT๐Ÿฎ

Scientists collectively spend tens of millions of hours peer reviewing each year, mostly for no $$. Why??

In new work w/ Charles Ayoubi and @innovation.bsky.social, we observe a private benefit for participating in evaluation: ๐Ÿ’ก๐Ÿ’กLearning๐Ÿ’ก๐Ÿ’ก

06.07.2025 16:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 51    ๐Ÿ” 13    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 6

Interesting take. Thanks for linking

06.07.2025 01:07 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Learning by Evaluating: Evidence from Academic Peer Review The evaluation of innovative projects is an essential task for scientific and business organizations alike. While prior work has focused on the quality of evalu

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

@charles @jamesmzd.bsky.social

05.07.2025 00:25 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

Why do we peer review?

In a new paper, we establish a self-interested reason: learning.

With a quasi-experimental design applied to admin data from 55 journals, we show reviewing a paper doubles chances of citing it in future work!

05.07.2025 00:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 40    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 3    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2

๐Ÿ˜‡

01.07.2025 16:14 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media - Nature Communications The study shows a significant gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on Twitter, finding that women are about 28% less likely to promote their own academic papers compared to men, a disparity which is...

www.nature.com/articles/s41...

01.07.2025 15:46 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Men are much more likely to self-promote their papers on Twitter/X than women

01.07.2025 15:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
No Kin in the Game: Moral Hazard and War in the US Congress | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 131, No 9 We study agency frictions in the US Congress. We examine the long-standing hypothesis that political elites engage in conflict because they fail to internalize the associated costs. We compare the vot...

Seems relevant: politicians are more likely to vote for war when they don't have sons who would do the fighting
www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...

22.06.2025 03:31 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
NIH Funding Has Stagnated Since 2003 This Viewpoint explores how funding has changed at the National Institutes of Health over time and discusses how continued investment is necessary to maintain the current level of biomedical research.

jamanetwork.com/journals/jam...

20.06.2025 21:11 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation

www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1...

19.06.2025 04:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

First-ever ranking of journals by impact factor, published by Garfield in Science in 1972.

Science is ranked #77, impact factor 2.99
Nature is #114, impact factor 2.34

19.06.2025 04:34 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 24    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 3
Preview
I got fooled by AI-for-science hypeโ€”here's what it taught me I used AI in my plasma physics research and it didnโ€™t go the way I expected.

Going to the hospital because I broke my wrist smashing the endorse button:
www.understandingai.org/p/i-got-fool...

19.05.2025 18:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 120    ๐Ÿ” 30    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 6    ๐Ÿ“Œ 10

No, I'd say conventional wisdom doesn't even conceptualize interdisc. as topic vs knowledgebase, it's usually just 1 dimensional. We see that conceptualization as one of our contributions.

15.05.2025 21:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 2    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Feels reasonable to me too. But that's not quite the conventional wisdom ๐Ÿคท

15.05.2025 19:20 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success - Nature The degree of interdisciplinarity in research proposals negatively correlates with funding success across a wide range of research fields.

Yup, you're right.

Here's one study of grants:
www.nature.com/articles/nat...

15.05.2025 17:51 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 4    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Tldr: conventional wisdom only partially true, depends on
- which interdis. type we're talking about
- how types align with each other and audience

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

15.05.2025 01:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Conventional wisdom says interdisciplinary research is valuable but harder to get through peer review (need to please diverse reviewers, etc).

@sdxiang.bsky.social Daniel and I partnered with @ioppublishing.bsky.social to test this wisdom and add nuance

15.05.2025 01:03 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 21    ๐Ÿ” 9    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Schism 2: electric boogaloo

03.05.2025 03:53 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 3    ๐Ÿ” 1    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
YOUR RIGHT ARM FOR A PUBLICATION IN AER? The time tradeoff (TTO) method is popular in medical decision making for valuing health states. We use it to elicit economists' preferences for publishing in top economic journals and for living with...

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...

02.05.2025 03:23 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

Periodic reminder that economists would sacrifice half a thumb for an AER pub

02.05.2025 03:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 11    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 2
Quality Matters: The Expulsion of Professors and the Consequences for PhD Student Outcomes in Nazi Germany | Journal of Political Economy: Vol 118, No 4 I investigate the effect of faculty quality on PhD student outcomes. To address the endogeneity of faculty quality I use exogenous variation provided by the expulsion of mathematics professors in Nazi...

www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1...

25.04.2025 16:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 0    ๐Ÿ” 0    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0