ERROR @error.reviews was awarded a Commendation from the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science!
25.07.2025 12:59 β π 18 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0@metahag.bsky.social
Meta-science | Open Science | PhD student | Disability Research | Editorial Assistant @ Meta-Psychology | https://elucidatescience.netlify.app
ERROR @error.reviews was awarded a Commendation from the Society for the Improvement of Psychological Science!
25.07.2025 12:59 β π 18 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0For anyone whoβs published systematic reviews, how often did you succeed in getting unpublished data by reaching out to authors? I donβt mean additional/IP data from published papers, but new data or data they could not get published. #evidencesynthesis
16.07.2025 10:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I asked with the same prompt and z-curve was not mentioned at all. I got too long of a reply but it mentioned:
Among commonly used tests, Petersβ test seems to strike a good balance:
β better power than Beggβs,
β lower false positive rate than Eggerβs when heterogeneity is present.
A lot of discussions about open science in psychology happened on blogs. I have been archiving them and will make their content available. I remember 37 blogs (with 2827 posts!) but which blogs did I forget, and are not on my list? Please share and reply with any that are missing!
09.07.2025 13:51 β π 20 π 14 π¬ 8 π 0New post! "A Tale of Two Science Reform Movements," in which I compare the recent #Metascience2025 and #SIPS2025 conferences, and find that I am much more at home at one than the other. getsyeducated.substack.com/p/a-tale-of-...
05.07.2025 13:00 β π 127 π 41 π¬ 14 π 6Agreed, I feel like the overall direction of the entire conference felt too abstract and almost like itβs engaging in βmeta-washingβ
02.07.2025 20:19 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Agreed, I feel like the overall direction of the entire conference felt too abstract and almost like itβs engaging in βmeta-washingβ
02.07.2025 20:19 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0Yes, very slow, no matter which browser used. Itβs been like that since they had the crashβ¦
30.06.2025 09:48 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0COSIG logo: COSIG (Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides) Now available at cosig.net!
Anyone can do post-publication peer review.
Anyone can be a steward of the scientific literature.
Anyone can do forensic metascience.
Anyone can sleuth.
That's why we are launching COSIG: the Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides, an open source resource for all of the above.
cosig.net
What came first, the paper idea or the acronym
27.05.2025 09:45 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 05. This is the moment of truth.
The metascience community could tout this as a win and fundraise off of it, cementing their legacy as useful idiots.
Or they can side with science, boldly speaking out about the bad-faith ways the Trump administration is co-opting their language and momentum.
I found this refreshing.
erikengdahl.se/autism/isnt/
Act I: Renaissance
Act II: Cowboy Carter
Act III: TBD
Autistic adults talk about disclosure: "assumptions and lack of understanding about autism meant that not only did disclosure not lead to the desired effect of having their needs met, but they were also either dismissed or discriminated against" journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... free
17.05.2025 09:49 β π 29 π 14 π¬ 1 π 3Brandolini underestimated how many orders of magnitude are involved
01.05.2025 17:02 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Yeah thatβs a very good point. I believe PCI could be more flexible and on hands with making it work than traditional journals may be, so I wonder if that approach would incentivize preregs over registered reports when submitting them directly to journals.
25.04.2025 15:06 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Interesting, if you happened to have edited preregistered studies, would you say thereβs any difference in how deviations are perceived when done in an RR format vs. a finalized study that was preregistered?
25.04.2025 12:07 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Thanks! Thatβs great to hear.
25.04.2025 06:31 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Itβs not for me (I hope at least it wonβt happen π) but I am curious about whether deviations happen less/just as often in registered reports than regular preregs, and what the process is in this case.
24.04.2025 20:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0For people who published/conducted Stage 2 registered reports, have you ever had issues that required significant deviations from the Stage 1 and how have you handled this? Are there any instances where this did not lead to rejection? #openscience
24.04.2025 19:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 4 π 0Can I do another PhD π₯Ίππ½ππ½
24.04.2025 12:39 β π 9 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0I am hiring a PhD student on the meaningful interpretation of effect sizes as part of my VICI funded project. This is a 4 year paid position in a welcoming and collaborative environment. Find out more or apply at www.tue.nl/werken-bij-t...
23.04.2025 22:23 β π 66 π 65 π¬ 0 π 2We have the connection folks... RFK jr will find the cause of autism to be something that Elon's neurolink. can fix. Since there is no longer any kind of an FDA, and he is involved with that, guess who is going to fast pass the "cure". This is so fucking dangerous I cannot even....
23.04.2025 21:42 β π 185 π 71 π¬ 30 π 9Trixie and Katya Unhhhh compilations
17.04.2025 14:23 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Good ideas β and impactful tools β donβt just come from rich, Western nations, says Aleksandra LaziΔ, a social scientist in Serbia
https://go.nature.com/4cPMVUd
The scientific integrity community has many members with no current academic affiliation, who hence make a lot of #ICanHazPDF requests.
Sympathetic institutions could make 1 or 2 fixed-term unremunerated positions available, just for the library access.
Can your university help? π
(Please boost!)
Model to Meaning: How to interpret statistical models with marginaleffects for R and Python
ππ
π
Yay!! I just submitted the complete manuscript of my upcoming book to the publisher!
Learn to easily and clearly interpret (almost) any stats model w/ R or Python. Simple ideas, consistent workflow, powerful tools, detailed case studies.
Read it for free @ marginaleffects.com
#RStats #PyData
Amazing progress throughout the years, and the entire platform looks very engaging and easy to use! I really hope to see this spread within psych and adjacent fields.
09.04.2025 20:47 β π 1 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Psych-DS is (1) spellcheck for your datasets and (2) a pathway to standardizing data in our academic fields that *everyone* can learn.
And it's live RIGHT NOW!
psych-ds.github.io
(This is the announcement post I've been leading up to)