Great write-up of our recent management science paper on workplace development. Bottom line - focus on the future, not the past, to give and receive more helpful advice!
www.linkedin.com/posts/mgt-sc...
@mikeyeomans.bsky.social
Decision-making in conversation, Natural Language Processing Assistant Professor @imperialcollege @ImperialBiz
Great write-up of our recent management science paper on workplace development. Bottom line - focus on the future, not the past, to give and receive more helpful advice!
www.linkedin.com/posts/mgt-sc...
If you're at @aomconnect.bsky.social #AOM2025, come check out our panel on NLP in organizations, featuring @dholtz.bsky.social, Sameer Srivastava, @williambrady.bsky.social, @mikeyeomans.bsky.social & me! We'll explore topics including hiring, cooperation, agency, and moral outrage -- don't miss it!
26.07.2025 16:23 β π 2 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0Emily Hu starting off the last session at #SJDM with a bang! Text analysis for JDM
25.11.2024 16:04 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Judgment and Decision Making (JDM) starter pack
Happy to add you
go.bsky.app/8nDKmwG
Hereβs my vision statement from my application for Editor in Chief of Psychological Science. I wrote it before getting the position, my plans & goals are evolving now that Iβm getting started. Look out for an opening editorial!
https://sometimesimwrong.typepad.com/wrong/2023/10/my-next-chapter.html
On further reflection, the selection of @simine.com as Editor-in-Chief of Psychological Science is one of the most important milestones for the reform movement in psychology.
There will be impact on the journal, sure. But more, selecting a committed, visible reformer illustrates its normalization.
THE NEW EIC OF PSYCH SCIENCE IS @simine.com WAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!
www.psychologicalscience.org/publications...
Open data sharing is a good thing; Protecting participant privacy is a good thing. Sometimes these two good things are in conflict.
Our new preprint introduces a decision-making framework and open source tools to help share as openly as possible and as closed as necessary.
osf.io/preprints/me...
Fraud cases may capture attention, but they remain the exception.
The quieter attitudes and actions of the many are incrementally moving science toward greater integrity and rigor.
The visibility of fraud and other antagonism-to-open may contribute to underestimating the support for open science.
IMO, reproducibility is an objective and uncontroversial benefit for everyone... and yes,
Journals should require and confirm it. But authors must also invest more time making reproduction EASY for others (ie not just possible). We can't push all this work onto overworked journals.
A plea from Steve Lindsay to psychology professional societies that publish journals: Assess computational reproducibility open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
01.10.2023 07:00 β π 20 π 7 π¬ 1 π 3Hi folks, feels like we're making the move.... #HelloFromTheOtherSide #psychtwitter #econtwitter #NLPtwitter
24.09.2023 20:42 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0