And because its an awful industry with limitless money and limitless hubris, it is paying Gibson Dunn to *appeal* the court's rejection of that argument.
04.03.2026 15:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@pulvinator.bsky.social
Public interest attorney- admin law, workers rights, consumer rights, civil rights- personal account/views my own - he/him Contributor Consumer Law and Policy Blog https://clpblog.citizen.org/
And because its an awful industry with limitless money and limitless hubris, it is paying Gibson Dunn to *appeal* the court's rejection of that argument.
04.03.2026 15:38 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I've seen a lot of ridiculous invocations of the federal-officer removal statute (Tyson Foods, every nursing home in America)...but this one takes the cake. *Polymarket* argued that its gaming operations are actions taken under federal officer direction. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
04.03.2026 15:36 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Selfie of a cold man on the Tufts University quad next to a statue of an elephant
Back on campus for the first time in 20 years to talk public interest legal careers, and had to take a selfie with the new Jumbo!
03.03.2026 23:30 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0This evening seems like a good one to start my countdown to my two-month sabbatical.... 63 days
02.03.2026 23:46 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Just filed - our final brief in our case challenging DOL's unlawful and cruel shuttering of all 99 Job Corps centers last May, which we successfully got stayed last summer
www.citizen.org/wp-content/u...
One thing nice about filing briefs on behalf of clients instead of just sharing your views on the law is that you never risk a brief that just dunks on you by name repeatedly
27.02.2026 14:51 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0You might say the dogma lives loudly within them
26.02.2026 21:28 — 👍 71 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
DC district court has denied the Department of Education's motion to dismiss our case challenging IES's termination of four research studies, its peer review program, and restricted data use application processing!
ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show...
Not only is this a two-brief week, but the one I filed today has 10 pages discussing admiralty jurisdiction....
25.02.2026 17:42 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Finally, someone sticking up for the underdog
20.02.2026 17:00 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Rough decision from the Second Circuit this morning holding that a fair housing group lacked Havens standing--rejecting the standing theory relied upon for enforcement of the Fair Housing Act in dozens of cases over the last few decades ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/is...
20.02.2026 16:28 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Remarkable that we have a major questions doctrine but the justices can't seem to agree what that is
20.02.2026 15:15 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Nerd point in the tariffs opinion - the court concludes in a footnote that the district court in the lead case lacked jurisdiction
20.02.2026 15:04 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Every time I think that we've run out of names for legal organizations that use the words "public," "democracy" or "rights", a new one emerges
19.02.2026 17:41 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Well this is a first for me: walking to the courthouse for oral argument in an hour when another Circuit weighs in on the exact issue
13.02.2026 16:06 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Interesting Fourth Circuit opinion, dividing 2-1, as to whether a motion to strike class allegations is a thing under the FRCP. It says no, but you can move for denial of class certification pre-discovery. www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/241...
09.02.2026 21:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Almost as bad as other people.
07.02.2026 19:32 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0No I'm a grownup
07.02.2026 19:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0By being nasty and abusive to people?
07.02.2026 19:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It appears we have different role models for discourse that goals of social justice
07.02.2026 19:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I only do that for boys 🥰
07.02.2026 19:21 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Ironically, given your response, you do not seem to be able to handle this single opinion.
07.02.2026 19:09 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If only I could be as creative as you and call people "bitch."
07.02.2026 19:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Are you suggesting this opinion validating a brutal practice, reversing the decision of several trial judges and binding all judges in TX, MS, and LA is insignificant, Kelsey? Or that calling people "bitch" in this context signifies you are a good person?what is it youre arguing over?
07.02.2026 19:05 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Whether a litigant won or lost a case isnt always objective, but here it is.
07.02.2026 05:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Are you suggesting this was a loss for the administration? Or that it was not significant? What is the objection?
07.02.2026 05:10 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yes, Kyle Cheney is a reporter for Politico that is being attacked for his sharing of a court opinion
07.02.2026 04:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0