florence's Avatar

florence

@morallawwithin.bsky.social

philosophy doer. kantian. paying people to torture animals is bad.

3,993 Followers  |  232 Following  |  60 Posts  |  Joined: 10.05.2023  |  1.7792

Latest posts by morallawwithin.bsky.social on Bluesky

Back to work, back to Fichte

04.09.2025 13:04 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3

Okay all post all my substack posts

02.09.2025 03:19 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Made a good post

open.substack.com/pub/morallaw...

02.09.2025 01:37 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
How I quit drinking Or, On Thought's Determination of Action

My posts are continuing to be very good

open.substack.com/pub/morallaw...

16.07.2025 02:54 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Hello Bluesky! Dropping in to say that if you like my Takes you should read & subscribe to my Substack. I’ve got some good posts in the take oven rn too

morallawwithin.substack.com

08.07.2025 04:10 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This β€œmaterial conditions” discussion is silly. When you show up to the ballot box, do you vote based on your β€œmaterial conditions,” or based on which ideas are correct? That’s what I thought

24.04.2025 04:27 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

this book destroyed me

23.11.2024 04:12 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

many people have been following me

23.11.2024 04:11 β€” πŸ‘ 21    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Wer ist ein Mitglied von deutschem Bluesky

16.11.2024 18:03 β€” πŸ‘ 11    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 0

sorry not sorry, i'm starting it right now

guys, is '2+2 = 4' an example of the synthetic a priori?

14.11.2024 01:01 β€” πŸ‘ 64    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 4

I’m different though

14.11.2024 15:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Every time I look on here it’s just posts like β€œHello new friends from twitter! Just so you know we do things a bit differently here. Negativity is punished with execution”

14.11.2024 15:16 β€” πŸ‘ 56    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

The fact that there’s so much that atheists can’t explain seems like a strong consideration in favor of theism

13.11.2024 23:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Are the blueskers aware that they should stop eating animals and animal products

12.11.2024 00:04 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Too far

11.11.2024 23:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In general, β€œX didn’t happen” is not a good explanation for the fact that X happened

11.11.2024 23:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

How do we view explicit images on here? I thought this was like twitter

11.11.2024 22:43 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s not not great, the mistake is just I’ve found myself on an app where people say the kinds of things above.

11.11.2024 23:33 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If you're exhausted now and daunted by the fight ahead, that means you were trying as hard as you could before. Take a rest.

11.11.2024 21:01 β€” πŸ‘ 348    πŸ” 33    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 3

No, this does not explain Jesus’ becoming incarnate. It’s unclear how the existence of a myth could cause something so profound.

11.11.2024 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I know I haven’t been posting but as a senior banksy member my recommendation is that this won’t be new twitter until people are more mean and bitter. Ramp it up

11.11.2024 23:12 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

"bluesky is cooking it's really taking off" i have not yet seen a teenager posting stuff like 'you dont miss your dead dog you miss uncritical affection from someone who can't challenge you' so no i do not agree

11.11.2024 12:52 β€” πŸ‘ 8333    πŸ” 849    πŸ’¬ 146    πŸ“Œ 90
Post image

i may have made a mistake

11.11.2024 23:08 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

How do atheists explain the fact that God became incarnate and redeemed our nature from sin and death?

11.11.2024 23:04 β€” πŸ‘ 24    πŸ” 3    πŸ’¬ 8    πŸ“Œ 0

omg u were here this whole time πŸ₯Ί

11.11.2024 22:52 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

blauer himmel

11.11.2024 22:51 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Not true

12.10.2023 15:50 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

not a lot of people understand that there are literally only two ways your character can be, either subordinating happiness to the moral law, or vice versa

21.09.2023 02:52 β€” πŸ‘ 7    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If i follow you on twitter & haven’t followed you here lmk

21.09.2023 02:41 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

love seeing a bunch of new followers every time elon announces the newest Dumb Shit

21.09.2023 02:39 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@morallawwithin is following 19 prominent accounts