labubuxbrandt's Avatar

labubuxbrandt

@logiehaus.bsky.social

yaplord

1,527 Followers  |  538 Following  |  4,990 Posts  |  Joined: 13.11.2024  |  1.9624

Latest posts by logiehaus.bsky.social on Bluesky

It's funny how cartoonishly bad Old (2021) is considering the graphic novel its based on, Sandcastle, is genuinely pretty moving? What a complete mess.

06.08.2025 23:20 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

to better nurture their young 🀨but go off

06.08.2025 19:55 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
There is no such thing as liberalism β€” or progressivism, etc.

There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation.

There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit:

There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time.

For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. β€œThe king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual.

As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself β€” backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

There is no such thing as liberalism β€” or progressivism, etc. There is only conservatism. No other political philosophy actually exists; by the political analogue of Gresham’s Law, conservatism has driven every other idea out of circulation. There might be, and should be, anti-conservatism; but it does not yet exist. What would it be? In order to answer that question, it is necessary and sufficient to characterize conservatism. Fortunately, this can be done very concisely. Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protectes but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. There is nothing more or else to it, and there never has been, in any place or time. For millenia, conservatism had no name, because no other model of polity had ever been proposed. β€œThe king can do no wrong.” In practice, this immunity was always extended to the king’s friends, however fungible a group they might have been. Today, we still have the king’s friends even where there is no king (dictator, etc.). Another way to look at this is that the king is a faction, rather than an individual. As the core proposition of conservatism is indefensible if stated baldly, it has always been surrounded by an elaborate backwash of pseudophilosophy, amounting over time to millions of pages. All such is axiomatically dishonest and undeserving of serious scrutiny. Today, the accelerating de-education of humanity has reached a point where the market for pseudophilosophy is vanishing; it is, as The Kids Say These Days, tl;dr . All that is left is the core proposition itself β€” backed up, no longer by misdirection and sophistry, but by violence.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

Then the appearance arises that the task is to map β€œliberalism”, or β€œprogressivism”, or β€œsocialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism.

No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get:

The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

So this tells us what anti-conservatism must be: the proposition that the law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone, and cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone. Then the appearance arises that the task is to map β€œliberalism”, or β€œprogressivism”, or β€œsocialism”, or whateverthefuckkindofstupidnoise-ism, onto the core proposition of anti-conservatism. No, it a’n’t. The task is to throw all those things on the exact same burn pile as the collected works of all the apologists for conservatism, and start fresh. The core proposition of anti-conservatism requires no supplementation and no exegesis. It is as sufficient as it is necessary. What you see is what you get: The law cannot protect anyone unless it binds everyone; and it cannot bind anyone unless it protects everyone.

I think it's now possible to make a poli-sci course that equips one for modern political analysis better than most classic theory and has a syllabus sourced entirely from random internet posts.

Text 1. Wilhoit's Law, born as part of a 2018 blog comment
crookedtimber.org/2018/03/21/l...

13.07.2025 01:07 β€” πŸ‘ 3539    πŸ” 1092    πŸ’¬ 194    πŸ“Œ 234

I take it all back u will be punished

06.08.2025 18:32 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

that girl in the photo is about to sprout wings to soar and so are u

06.08.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

bc it went from a trap to a threat

06.08.2025 18:23 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

this is what killed David Lynch

06.08.2025 18:17 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

tbf that's all early digital revolution content. U gotta make the services appealing before you lock down the system and start extracting. I'm looking at you, Gamepass.

06.08.2025 15:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

oof very much that

06.08.2025 15:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 06.08.2025 15:32 β€” πŸ‘ 12    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

oh its big, dumb, and freaky i know it

06.08.2025 15:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

tbh I remember using Hulu in highschool, rip. Also Hulu has lowkey been one of the sneakier better services for content, I hope this doesn't change their production pipeline at all.

06.08.2025 15:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

US medical care is expensive, rationed, and often not patient-centered, so it's not surprising to me that people seek alternatives. See also: "wellness".

We've shifted risk to individuals, who are responding by acting like people, and tech corps are taking advantage of them. It's a systems problem.

06.08.2025 14:28 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Idk I just post

06.08.2025 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@joofarc.bsky.social

06.08.2025 04:27 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I like the glowing sense of pride in the second. A proud mother

06.08.2025 03:52 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

oh no

06.08.2025 03:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

maybe this is expressing a type way too hard

06.08.2025 03:39 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
A Happy Trail to Nowhere with Emil Wakim
YouTube video by Gianmarco Soresi A Happy Trail to Nowhere with Emil Wakim

and let’s just throw Emil Wakim in there, holy shit

06.08.2025 03:38 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

showing gay men the existence of Gianmarco Soresi is like showing ppl the video from the Ring

06.08.2025 03:35 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 06.08.2025 03:35 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

give her the gun

06.08.2025 03:34 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I would buy a Labubu Rifle

06.08.2025 03:00 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

snakeman on the train

06.08.2025 01:28 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I think ppl forget she’s 27. Like if she’s a zoomer that’s def an elder zoomer.

05.08.2025 22:39 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 05.08.2025 22:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Digital Necromancy in the Age of AI Thanks to advances in AI, we are no longer allowed to truly die. The peace of the grave and the finality that defines the human condition are all being sacrificed on the altar of artificial intelligen...

I wrote about the horrifying use of AI to resurrect the dead as hollow simulacrum puppeted by the living and why we should reject normalizing this as it dehumanizes the living and desecrates our humanity.

www.thedissident.news/digital-necr...

05.08.2025 18:13 β€” πŸ‘ 1189    πŸ” 251    πŸ’¬ 35    πŸ“Œ 28

he said he fell and really hurt himself and ya'll are mocking him...

05.08.2025 17:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

why is the president on the roof

05.08.2025 15:09 β€” πŸ‘ 379    πŸ” 31    πŸ’¬ 133    πŸ“Œ 26

some of ya'll are in denial about this #truthbomb

05.08.2025 13:35 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@logiehaus is following 20 prominent accounts