Increasingly impressed by Mark Carney.
20.01.2026 16:01 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Increasingly impressed by Mark Carney.
20.01.2026 16:01 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Inflation up again, from 3.2% in Nov to 3.4% in Dec, just as it seemed we might be on a downward trajectory. Mostly driven by alcohol & tobacco + air fares, so arguably not the bare essentials. But food prices are still climbing.
21.01.2026 07:58 β π 5 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0
Interestingly, of those inactive, there's a key trend of more people wanting a job than not.
This suggests to me that people are experiencing more barriers to work, rather than a lack of desire to find a job
The post pandemic driver of inactivity continues to be ill-health, but increasingly fewer people record being inactive due to looking after family
20.01.2026 09:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Inactivity has fallen slightly by 0.2 percentage points to 20.8%
This seems to be driven mostly by a fall in inactive over 65s, as more (re)enter the workforce
But the big story of today is that unemployment has already outstripped the latest OBR forecast
While it's held steady at 5.1%, we're already beyond the predicted peak, which is a worrying sign
One more worrying trend for economic growth is that average hours worked continues to languish behind pre-pandemic levels.
It looks small but it matters if people are working fewer hours. This is excepted to worsen over the next few years
Real wage growth continued to slow to 0.9% annual growth
Comparing this to the OBR forecast shows we're on track to reach sustained growth in living standards over the next few years, but the difficult start to last year has held us back a little
The good news is the steady fall in available vacancies (contributing to the loosening conditions above) appears to be levelling off
20.01.2026 09:37 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Looking across the sectors, the greatest competition is in financial services, and the least in health and social care
20.01.2026 09:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
We're heading towards a too loose labour market.
This matters as a loose labour market will mean a) workers are finding it difficult to find work, and b) act as a drag on future wage growth as workers lose bargaining power
π¨Todayβs Labour Market stats are out
Here's a short thread on the key trends π
When we cut 30 affordable homes to protect a distant view, weβre not preserving heritage, weβre preserving a housing crisis π
11.09.2025 12:56 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
A couple of weeks ago I had the privilege of joining the first UK delegation of Emerging Leaders to the European Union in Brussels.
Apparently Iβm a βfuture leaderβ now, which is although flattering, is possibly a sign that Brexit did more damage than we thoughtβ¦
The latest fiasco over cuts to benefits reveals the deeply ingrained influence of the Truss premiership on this government. They're paralysed by fear of the markets at a time when we need courage.
@maxmosley.bsky.social writes for @theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
A marvellous and absolutely spot-on piece from @maxmosley.bsky.social @neweconomics.bsky.social
If Starmer and Reeves don't change tack soon, they and the UK, will be in even deeper sh*t
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
"the financial returns from well-targeted public spending are often far higher than our anaemic assumptions allow... A politics that always talks down the impact of spending ends up justifying stagnation" @neweconomics.bsky.social's @maxmosley.bsky.social www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
06.07.2025 13:44 β π 7 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
Really grateful to have my first opinion piece published in the guardian:
βFiscal rules werenβt created by Truss, but their new totemic status in British politics was forged in the fire she left behindβ
www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...
"Today is a sad indictment of how we make policy in this country. Quote from Max Mosley, senior economist: We've ended up with a rushed and poorly designed set of reforms to disability benefits as a scramble to find government savings after GDP growth was lower than expected following the autumn budget. Something has gone seriously wrong here. How have we ended up in a world where 1 percentage point error in our GDP forecasts cascades down into pushing a quarter of a million people into poverty?"
Today is sad indictment of how we make policy in this country.
Our view on the disability benefits cut vote.
βI think some MPs will rightly just be looking at this and saying, I donβt want to be a politician who is responsible for pushing anybody into poverty, let alone more than 150,000.β
@maxmosley.bsky.social on today's vote on disability benefit cuts in @bigissue.com www.bigissue.com/news/politic...
I can't think of a time in history where we could influence the lives of so many, overnight and at such a low cost.
I spoke to LBC about why we should see removing the 2 child benefit cap as a wonderful opportunity π
"New Labour took 14 years and billions of pounds worth of policies to lift half a million children out of poverty.
Keir Starmer could do the same overnight with one policy costing just a fraction of that."
NEF's @maxmosley.bsky.social on @lbc.co.uk calling for removal of the two-child benefit cap.
A stark example of this is the government's plan to cut PIP, claiming we "can't afford" the rapid rise in claims. But @maxmosley.bsky.social's analysis shows this rise has been fuelled by growing financial insecurity, which will be further exacerbated by cuts /9 neweconomics.org/2025/05/what...
15.05.2025 16:06 β π 7 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Weβre still only just learning about the true scale of the building crisis in PFI schools - worth reading this article covering the pretty extraordinary statements from officials at yesterdayβs inquiry π
13.05.2025 16:41 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Encouraging to see our latest @neweconomics.bsky.social analysis quoted in Parliament today
08.05.2025 11:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0There is an iceberg dead ahead. My colleague @maxmosley.bsky.social with his other hat on has spotted it. We can all see it. The government needs to change course now.
07.05.2025 09:27 β π 16 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0
Important thread about disability benefits that MPs & public urgently need to understand!
<50% of disabled people claim benefits!
More financial hardship = more need for fair claims.
βunlikely the proposed tightening of eligibility for PIP will achieve much other than causing further hardshipβ
On this basis, it seems unlikely that the proposed tightening of eligibility for PIP will achieve much other than causing further hardship for a group struggling the most since the pandemic.
Link to the full @neweconomics.bsky.social analysis here:
We found that on its own, the number of disabled people explains 71% of the PIP caseload in a particular region. But when we add each regionβs relative deprivation using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) we can explain 94% of the regional PIP caseload
07.05.2025 07:50 β π 8 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0