Or was this a "we cover Trump's words and do no follow up on the actual reality" type deal?
23.02.2026 15:27 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0Or was this a "we cover Trump's words and do no follow up on the actual reality" type deal?
23.02.2026 15:27 β π 0 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0I do wonder about some of the reporting on this. Seems clear @warren.senate.gov came ready to play, and there has been crickets from the admin on this since Trump's "announcement." Maybe reporters who covered Trump's initial pronouncement should start mentioning that?
23.02.2026 15:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Snowy night pork goulash. Recipe Americaβs Test Kitchen
23.02.2026 13:08 β π 91 π 4 π¬ 2 π 0Stuffed shells with peas fennel and spinach. Recipe by Americaβs Test Kitchen
22.02.2026 18:53 β π 2 π 1 π¬ 1 π 07/ As I said, woo boy.
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 06/ Garbage in, garbage out. But there are more errors! The report adds in the same dopey extrapolated βcostsβ to the auto market. The CFPB is expressly forbidden from regulating auto dealersβ¦ www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/...
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 05/ It gets much, much wackier after that. They then extrapolate from this single (not a) βnatural experimentβ to every other market that the CFPB supposedly regulates, based onβ¦ complaint volumeβ¦?!?!
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 04/ But here they are two different things! Is the difference in cost due to the regulation? Uhh. No. Among many (many) other things, there is a completely different market for high risk loans. That affects prices! This is not a real study. www.bankrate.com/mortgages/se...
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 03/ Usually a βnatural experimentβ is when two different jurisdictions regulate the same thing differently. That at least in theory lets you see the effect of the regulation.
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 02/ Where to begin? The report relies on a βnatural experimentβ between highly regulated high-cost mortgages and less regulated lower interest ones. I do not think those words mean what you think they meanβ¦
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 01/ Woo boy. This CFPB βstudy.β Truly a sad, sick joke. You can really see the Admin watching its numbers sink into the toilet on affordability & thrash in response. Would be funny if not so bleak. If this is their case against the CFPBβ¦ wow. They clearly hate what they donβt understand.π§΅
18.02.2026 14:26 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1Duck served with @smittenkitchen.bsky.social lentil-potato salad (cooked in duck fat) and Alison Roman fennel lemon anchovy salad
16.02.2026 14:37 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
A monopolistic private equity company has caused a crisis of typefaces at the CFPB. Here's the story: indebt.substack.com/p/this-week-...?
That and much more in this week's edition of This Week In Debt from @borrowerjustice.bsky.social!
Rainy day duck
15.02.2026 20:48 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Dan Dan noodles from the new Little Tiger Dumplings in Farragut square DC
11.02.2026 15:22 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0
7/ Say it with me:
This administration is not serious about affordability.
This administration is not serious about affordability.
This administration is not serious about affordability.
6/ That also ignores everything else the CFPB could do on affordability:
Medical debt. Credit reporting errors that jack up loan prices. Rental fees. Junk fees. A thousand other pressure points.
Even the Trump FTC may be doing something on rental prices. Meanwhile, the CFPB is basically dark.
5/ Consumer complaints more than DOUBLED in 2025. How many billions were taken by abuses that would otherwise have been deterred? Weβll never know.
bit.ly/4rKIcct
4/ And that still understates the damage, because it leaves out deterrence.
Wall Street and scammers know the CFPB is off the beat. Itβs open season on real people.
3/ Before Trump, the CFPB sent hundreds of examiners into banks and nonbanks every day to enforce the law.
Those exams got back billions for consumers and forced companies to change their illegal practices.
Itβs now been nearly a year since the CFPB conducted an exam.
bsky.app/profile/brad...
2/ The $19B comes from a clean, defensible tally:
β’ Overdraft fee rollbacks: ~$5B
β’ Credit card fee rollbacks: ~$10B
β’ Abandoned enforcement actions: ~$4B
That math is solid, but it leaves a ton out.
1/ I like this new @banking.senate.gov report on the cost of Trumpβs unlawful near-shutdown of the CFPB.
I will say that their headline numberββat leastβ $19 billionβis wildly conservative. Short π§΅
apnews.com/article/cfpb...
Imagine if I were in a city and arguably the best restaurant was named The Roosevelt and it was rec'd by @lukenorris.bsky.social and I didn't go. Luckily, we don't need to find out.
06.02.2026 16:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 06/ In short: financial education isnβt the worst thing, but itβs often a weak sauce substitute for confronting corporate power. The Epstein files make that logic uncomfortably clear.
05.02.2026 15:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 05/ Wild that this person who βlovesβ and βmissesβ Jeffrey Epstein, of all people, tried to get a job at the CFPB in *2012*! Really shows the cynicism of the crony capitalists.
05.02.2026 15:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 04/ Exhibit A: the CFPB mention in the Epstein files β¬οΈ
05.02.2026 15:49 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
3/ Personally, I donβt think consumer education really hurts, but I do think focusing on financial education is often a way of trying to look like you care about people when you really donβt want to stand up to corporate power.
www.consumerfinance.gov/about-us/new...
2/ There is a robust literature about the decidedly mixed effectiveness of consumer education. Compare
www.researchgate.net/publication/... with www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
1/ Remarkably, the CFPB appeared in the Epstein files last week. (I donβt think this has been covered anywhereβh/t @kirenitynow.bsky.social.) Itβs about financial education! And itβsβ¦ not flattering. Short thread on financial education, corporate power, and, yes, Epstein/CFPB π§΅
05.02.2026 15:49 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 2That @lenorepalladino.bsky.social might know what sheβs talking aboutβ¦.
04.02.2026 19:59 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0