Theyโre assuming reducing net migration is a good in itself?
09.12.2025 17:59 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0@paulbernal.bsky.social
Professor of IT Law at UEA Law School. Geek. Privacy, Politics. Wolves. Irish and British.
Theyโre assuming reducing net migration is a good in itself?
09.12.2025 17:59 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0And that means Starmer as well as Mahmood.
09.12.2025 17:59 โ ๐ 8 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1The Home Office also recognise that this may have an impact on user of care services who are likely to be older people and those with disabilities. The Home Office believes that despite these points the changes are justified for a number of policy reasons including reducing net migration and ending reliance on overseas recruitment.
Home Office Ministers state publicly, on the record, that they are deliberately making life worse for older people and people with disabilities who depend on care services, but it's worth it because it reduces net migration.
09.12.2025 15:18 โ ๐ 225 ๐ 155 ๐ฌ 17 ๐ 25Also, expel Elon Musk
09.12.2025 17:31 โ ๐ 24 ๐ 6 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yeah, what he actually means is 'I'm way too rich for it to make any difference to me either way.'
09.12.2025 17:22 โ ๐ 20 ๐ 4 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Always
09.12.2025 17:29 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I certainly donโt hate it, Iโm just realistic about it. The primary British failing is its inability to cope with the changes in the world since the Victorian era.
09.12.2025 17:12 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I admire your patience
09.12.2025 17:10 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Perhaps fans on either side of the Slavia Prague fans can be given special pride flags to wave at themโฆ
09.12.2025 17:05 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0How on earth can a foreign club come to London and demand home fans take down a Pride flag, because otherwise the away fans might commit crimes?
09.12.2025 16:25 โ ๐ 646 ๐ 219 ๐ฌ 52 ๐ 7But the good news is, by doing this, we defeated racism in the UK.
09.12.2025 13:01 โ ๐ 478 ๐ 147 ๐ฌ 19 ๐ 2Hey @technollama.bsky.social
09.12.2025 16:44 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0And about 6 nannies
09.12.2025 16:44 โ ๐ 5 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I didnโt mean that X, much though I agree! ๐
09.12.2025 16:40 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I love that film
09.12.2025 16:19 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Ok, reading about Starmerโs brown-nosing means Iโll be listening to the Dropkick Murphys and Stiff Little Fingers on the bus.
09.12.2025 16:17 โ ๐ 9 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0I think thatโs called bollocks.
09.12.2025 16:15 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0AI slop?
09.12.2025 16:10 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Damn, no-one ever raised a newborn before.
09.12.2025 16:09 โ ๐ 27 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 6 ๐ 0Weโre, not were, dammit
09.12.2025 16:08 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Oh, in particular areas like finance were still significant. Not in foreign policy.
09.12.2025 16:07 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0That merely means itโs possible, not that it could be assumed. The public message also matters a lot!
09.12.2025 15:59 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Sorry, no time! Teachingโฆ you can find it on my timeline.
09.12.2025 13:52 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Why are you assuming that?
09.12.2025 13:48 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0New, apparently
09.12.2025 13:47 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0What Starmer could have said is โwell, actually immigration is one of the things that has helped many countries to stay โviableโ, whatever that might mean.โ
09.12.2025 13:43 โ ๐ 25 ๐ 2 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0I expected them to be weak, I didnโt expect them to be this bad.
09.12.2025 13:38 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Yes, and one is deeply insulting to an important and honourable man, and the other isnโt.
09.12.2025 13:33 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Oh yes
09.12.2025 13:26 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0