Think itβs time for billionaires to learn that their wealth being taxed is in fact the most moderate solution to societyβs billionaire problem.
22.02.2026 10:40 β π 681 π 149 π¬ 8 π 6Think itβs time for billionaires to learn that their wealth being taxed is in fact the most moderate solution to societyβs billionaire problem.
22.02.2026 10:40 β π 681 π 149 π¬ 8 π 6Voor in de categorie everybody wins (behalve een paar multimiljonairs):
21.02.2026 12:16 β π 96 π 45 π¬ 4 π 5
It kinda comes down to this:
I am only ever going to "trust ai" if it learns how to die.
German sociologists of science (glaser/laudel) also integrate ANT into their sociology much easier than the haraway/mol stuff as it is much more similar to empiricist qual sociology
18.02.2026 11:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0it really decimated european sociology of science
16.02.2026 17:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0me and the girls finding out that everything is political
14.02.2026 14:52 β π 29 π 7 π¬ 2 π 0'we worden niet; we woorden.' Nice
10.02.2026 20:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Ha i was thinking of matter 'out there' but yes also the matter of scientific practice!
08.02.2026 13:41 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0I'm finally starting to understand that when you say that science is political, the Q how matter figures in the doing or science becomes super important. Because without matter you evidently end with unproductive relativism
08.02.2026 10:57 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0True!
06.02.2026 13:35 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Thanks! I found Bob Young's 1977 'Science is Social Relations' in Radical Science Journal as a really good example of quite extreme relativism in the sense of 'all science=ideology'. Turns out there are quite a few different 'relativisms' in the 1970s. Compared to those ANT is really modest.
06.02.2026 11:13 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0helder dank!
06.02.2026 11:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0waarom is het in friesland zoveel goedkoper? Is dat een vertekening door de data?
05.02.2026 11:59 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I will let you know where this lecture takes me! (probably to spending days and days on stuff I don't get paid for :))
26.01.2026 13:38 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0that is quite hardcore cultural relativism indeed! It's a weird kind of sociological relativism. I suspect that there are a few relativisms in that I would probably have to tease out. Thanks, very informative!
26.01.2026 12:12 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Cool I will do some digging in that direction as well as the feminists, thanks!
26.01.2026 11:27 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0So i guess it is the latter, we can't make any truth claims at all, everything is power.
26.01.2026 11:17 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0and so conestability, of every later of the onion of scientific and technological constructions, and we end up with a kind of epistemological electroshock therapy'. It is basically what positivists accused Haraway/Latour of being I think? But I can't find good examples of it being argued.
26.01.2026 11:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Haraway writes in situated'about this position: 'science is a contestable text and a powerfield; the content is the form. Period' and 'I, and others, started out wanting a strong tool for deconstructing the truth claims of hostile science by shwoing the radical historical specificity....'
26.01.2026 11:16 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0For a politics of science lecture I am looking for a good example of an actual relativist understanding of science (science=text) (from the 1970s or early 1980s i guess?). @toteraltermann.bsky.social as the most prominent STS historian on my timeline, do you have a good suggestion?
26.01.2026 10:17 β π 1 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0on my way to a meetup i initiated in a bout of extraversion
15.01.2026 14:29 β π 56 π 3 π¬ 7 π 0
Blij met dit mooie in memoriam voor mijn recent overleden studievriend Paul Mepschen.
www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2026/...
The US unilaterally and illegally using state violence in South America to achieve the goals of capital is a long-standing tradition
03.01.2026 12:21 β π 844 π 212 π¬ 14 π 5
βCapitalism tends to destroy its two sources of wealth: nature and human beings.β
- Karl Marx
I'm an "A.i." abolitionist. Here's why.
gregpak.net/2025/12/19/i...
Ik vraag me echt af hoe die LULUCF reductie vorm gaat krijgen en of een koolstofcertificaten markt daar een rol in gaat krijgen. Nu LULUCF geen onderdeel wordt dat van EU-ETS2 ben ik nogal sceptisch. Maar inderdaad als zuivel en vlees net zero moeten worden dan kan je het in de keten wel kwijt
17.12.2025 09:03 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0die 100 mil/jr aan koolstofcertificaten, verwacht je dat er genoeg vraag is om die via insetting in de keten te plaatsen? Want van vrijwillige offsetting moeten we het niet hebben met vezelgewassen denk ik.
17.12.2025 08:10 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
π₯ A lottery-first system π² makes research grants allocation cheaper, faster, and boosts funding for women, while "traditional" (patriarcal?) peer review drags everyone down.
π€ Maybe randomness is fairer than the experts.
π Time to rethink the whole game! π£
www.nature.com/articles/s41...
π§ͺ
Ik kan het niet lezen want @unileiden.bsky.social heeft geen geld over voor @scienceguide.bsky.social maar @sarahderijcke.nl heeft vast iets zinnigs gezegd.
08.12.2025 14:57 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0