GreenFuchsia's Avatar

GreenFuchsia

@wegreen.bsky.social

ATX

52 Followers  |  330 Following  |  156 Posts  |  Joined: 10.10.2023  |  2.1783

Latest posts by wegreen.bsky.social on Bluesky

When you understand how much of politics is just media choreography, you realize that so much of criticism of politicians is just journos raging that they missed their cue

04.12.2025 18:34 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

the next admin should do what obama did with for profit colleges to the online gambling industry. just stomp on them with the regulatory power of the state until they run out of money.

05.12.2025 05:53 β€” πŸ‘ 354    πŸ” 70    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 1

The intentionality of this varies but the world the transphobes are creating is one in which your safety depends on being readily intelligible as a particular gender and conforming to the expectations of every nearby busybody

03.12.2025 23:50 β€” πŸ‘ 70    πŸ” 23    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 3

Did he ever share? Lol

03.12.2025 20:24 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Love globalism, not a huge fan of the globes

02.12.2025 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 87    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

Being active in Texas politics is constantly lowering your expectations

27.11.2025 18:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

I don’t normally bitch about this stuff publicly, but after Charlie Kirk’s death, prominent right-wing commentators spent weeks calling me and several of my friends β€œterrorists” and β€œfascists.” So, was that incitement to murder?

27.11.2025 17:22 β€” πŸ‘ 108    πŸ” 14    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 2

I understand they were already on odd years and that moving to November is better but if we're gonna move elections around I really want them to just move it to an even year.

27.11.2025 17:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Dislike the change. Moving to odd years depresses turnout.

27.11.2025 17:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

i know house of cards is gauche now, but one of the first real "oh something is very wrong here" moments I had about the press was when the press was doing 'tee hee how naughty' bits about kate mara's character (the journalist at not-buzzfeed)

27.11.2025 03:28 β€” πŸ‘ 259    πŸ” 29    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 0

Ugh

27.11.2025 04:40 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't know what to call it, but there is a very common and annoying social media phenomenon where people demand validation for mildly antisocial behaviour, instead of just feeling mildly guilty about it like a normal person.

26.11.2025 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 259    πŸ” 44    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 2

This is pretty In line with the kind of coercion you normally see in custody battles where one parent has immigrant status.

Yes custody has been settled but still.

26.11.2025 18:23 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Yeah it's pretty common to weaponize immigrant status in custody battles and this seems like that sort of thing even though custody has already been settled.

26.11.2025 18:19 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Complaints about Buddhist monks being just thugs and bandits are a pretty persistent theme in 16th century Japanese writing, to the point where you see a lot of admiration for the Jesuits specifically for being actually pious and ascetic.

25.11.2025 23:49 β€” πŸ‘ 135    πŸ” 16    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1

Huh?? This is what I think of when I think of NIMBYism

26.11.2025 00:39 β€” πŸ‘ 22    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I don't know what even the point of arguing with these people is anymore, but the idea that "the crime gene" had been weeded out by 19th-20th century Europe is something you have to be a genuine imbecile to believe.

24.11.2025 02:39 β€” πŸ‘ 1231    πŸ” 170    πŸ’¬ 34    πŸ“Œ 9
Preview
The exit economy is here. Black Women are paying the highest price | Fortune This isn’t a blip. It’s a structural crisis. And it's not a recovery, it's a redistribution of opportunity.

Since February, according to my latest analysis, almost 600,000 Black women have been economically sidelined. The November 20, 2025, Jobs Report makes clear this isn’t a blip. It’s a structural crisis. That is not a recovery. It is a redistribution of opportunity.

23.11.2025 12:49 β€” πŸ‘ 2204    πŸ” 1135    πŸ’¬ 32    πŸ“Œ 104

It’s more of a Graeco-Roman β€œmartial homoromantic bisexuality”. Women are for producing heirs, men are for actual love and companionship.

22.11.2025 16:38 β€” πŸ‘ 85    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 2

reality requires a reset, I think

22.11.2025 20:04 β€” πŸ‘ 75    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 0

It all kinda unravels when you realize that this is what the reactionaries actually believe and that the whole satanic edifice of klantholicism is to keep you in this mental prison

21.11.2025 01:42 β€” πŸ‘ 72    πŸ” 12    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

the rich and powerful being slightly ashamed about all of it is probably a (societally non-specific) load bearing requirement for political stability

20.11.2025 22:16 β€” πŸ‘ 57    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

People really don't get the emphasis people all around place on taking the "correct" path to office.

Ive had friends who ran for office with the local establishment backing them and they get so mad at the existence of candidates without that backing.

20.11.2025 20:34 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Low key people underated how much of the initial hatred of AOC was this.

20.11.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

a lot of people are interpreting this as β€œwow elite liberals really hate the left” and while thats true, what’s mainly going on here is that elite liberals hate anyone who is young and did not complete the cursus honorum of local politics

20.11.2025 16:32 β€” πŸ‘ 644    πŸ” 84    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 5

The demonization of feminism has been so successful that you can say something as anodyne as β€œI think women are oppressed as women, and that gender is a hierarchy” and people will come at you like, β€œWow. I didn’t know you were a racist.”

17.11.2025 20:42 β€” πŸ‘ 521    πŸ” 75    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 0

I'm a longtime fan of @cnliberalism.org and I even get this was probably was the intent. But it was still outrageously offensive and ill-phrased, it's shockingly bad. It merits disavowal and apology and taking away this person's access to the account, not messing around with shrugging it off.

19.11.2025 20:33 β€” πŸ‘ 46    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Disturbingly reminds me of what happened to the Libertarian Party and how it started, randos being allowed to run the state and local twitter accounts and post increasingly insane and awful stuff, while the national org refused to stamp it out. Defending or equivocating on it is... a very bad call.

19.11.2025 20:27 β€” πŸ‘ 159    πŸ” 24    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image Post image Post image Post image

"The truth is that there are simply people who are antisocial by nature, and their capacity for living in an advanced society is made possible only by a vigilant law."

11.01.2025 18:47 β€” πŸ‘ 104    πŸ” 15    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4
Post image

This guy clearly has no problem with just lying to your face and I think you're a fucking idiot if you pay money to read his substack.

17.11.2025 17:49 β€” πŸ‘ 685    πŸ” 69    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 12

@wegreen is following 20 prominent accounts