@emdwarf.bsky.social
I was just thinking this was the answer
06.08.2025 03:29 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0starting to think we should give "strange women lying in ponds distributing swords" a chance as a basis for our system of government
01.08.2025 00:07 — 👍 5061 🔁 1003 💬 151 📌 68Felt it!
31.07.2025 16:33 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0This is hell. We are in hell.
30.07.2025 01:49 — 👍 4 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0Maybe we can time up the launch with the movie release date 😂 It'd be fun to watch a rocket and movie in the same day!
28.07.2025 21:43 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0But are you ready for adventures with the Pandora spacecraft?!
pandorasat.com
Coming to an orbit near you later this year : )
The other move is just to collect more library cards to cut down on Libby wait times! With a CA ID, you can get a card at basically any library system in the state. Collecting them is my new favorite game 😂 #GottaCatchEmAll
17.07.2025 03:19 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Had to turn off the Home Run Derby because the announcers don't know the difference between a decimal point and the Dewey Decimal System
15.07.2025 01:38 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Really wishing I had taken AP Gov these days...
11.07.2025 18:54 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0oh. oh no.
10.07.2025 01:40 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I hope you start digging up old MySpace pages next
10.07.2025 01:24 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Congrats!!! Let me know when I can come and visit : )
01.07.2025 08:31 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0👀👀👀
27.06.2025 03:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Feeling small this morning
23.06.2025 15:33 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Friendly reminder that folks who work for/with the government do not have the privilege of “checking the news less”
21.06.2025 21:47 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0😱
20.06.2025 22:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Where is the 48% number coming from? I don't see that in this article
20.06.2025 18:27 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Congrats!!!!!! Celebratory drinks in Porto??
19.06.2025 22:28 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0CONGRATS, DR. PHILLIPS!!!!!!!!!!!
16.06.2025 21:40 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0reupping this one for good measure
04.06.2025 22:46 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Noooooo, not Weaver 💔
03.06.2025 03:11 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Oh true! SPARCS for example (not a Pioneers mission) is totally built and just waiting for a ride to space. Pandora (undergoing testing) is supposed to launch on the same rocket as SPARCS this fall
01.06.2025 15:01 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0That’s because they’ve already received the full funding amount they were awarded. I’m worried that people will see this graphic and say “oh if astronomers think these missions are already cancelled, what’s the point in renewing them for extended missions?”
01.06.2025 14:36 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This graphic is incorrect!! Many of the X’ed out missions have not been cancelled
01.06.2025 04:49 — 👍 7 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0The Pioneers and some of the other smallsats that have already been selected are not being cancelled!
31.05.2025 18:18 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Well its NSF funded...
31.05.2025 00:14 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0So I started a new job last week......
31.05.2025 00:04 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Just to add to the fun of all this huh?
30.05.2025 23:29 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0"This budget reduces funding for the Astrophysics Pioneers program. This budget will support the project
at reduced scope and capacity."
Which I realize does not agree with the line that says $0 🙄
I think it is continued funding for all already selected missions, no new selections will be made
30.05.2025 23:07 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
