I read your article. You called them a para military force. But I would commend to your attention to the analysis from Mitchell v Henderson
23.01.2026 17:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1I read your article. You called them a para military force. But I would commend to your attention to the analysis from Mitchell v Henderson
23.01.2026 17:15 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1ICE arenβt soldiers
23.01.2026 01:20 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0At least in the second circuit
23.01.2026 01:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0(I mean, realistically this is a fifth amendment due process issue)
23.01.2026 01:12 β π 4 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Itβs a fifth amendment issue, because we arenβt dealing with actual soldiers
Thank you for coming to my TED talk
Itβs actually a fifth amendment issue. ICE isnβt the military.
ΓALA is here to answer any questions you may have
Actually, youβre thinking of the Fifth Amendment. ICE isnβt the military.
23.01.2026 00:12 β π 4 π 1 π¬ 1 π 0All day everyday
23.01.2026 00:11 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0This was an underappreciated post
22.01.2026 02:13 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Los Maduros son tostones
04.01.2026 00:59 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 1K-Cup Coffee Hunters
02.12.2025 12:31 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Other than a typo we didnβt catch until after filing, of course, Iβm pleased to have assisted
18.11.2025 13:54 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Probably not. The civilian cabinet member is not a soldier.
17.11.2025 16:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβm sorry, did you say something
05.11.2025 23:05 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Iβm horrified
30.10.2025 16:21 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Not troops though
30.10.2025 14:14 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
My conspiracy theory: the ballroom is a cover story.
The east wing actually covers the emergency operations center (bunker) and it needs to be redone to resist modern bunker buster weaponry and itβs likely being expanded in the process.
Not where I would have gone with it
10.10.2025 01:18 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβm ready
06.10.2025 02:53 β π 9 π 2 π¬ 0 π 0So a 3A violation should be enforceable through state trespass law
05.10.2025 16:43 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The problem with Bivens is that it established a federal tort rather than recognising that 4A enshrined immunity from state tort claims only if you had a warrant. Thatβs the function of a warrant. Confected federal immunity wasnβt something the founders intended.
05.10.2025 16:42 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs always 3A time. The most successful constitutional amendment weβve had.
05.10.2025 16:38 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0There really needs to be a way to get smackdowns on judges who say the stupidest things but it turns out itβs not prejudicial for you because you win on other grounds so thereβs no appeal
29.09.2025 18:09 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Pouring one out for Kimmel
18.09.2025 16:50 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0ABC should replace Kimmel with Matt Damon
18.09.2025 11:40 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0So i finally got to share a stage with @nationalsecuritylaw.org
14.09.2025 19:20 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 1Gorram antifa
12.09.2025 20:06 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Youβre seriously blaming Trump for this? Oh come on
10.09.2025 20:09 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Get me a client
29.08.2025 02:32 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0