“ This Dallas fuckery isn't just about Black disenfranchisement in this primary, it's about creating Black disenchantment to depress November turnout and put the core Dem voter base at odds with other constituencies within the party.” - @samisagesays.bsky.social
04.03.2026 04:09 — 👍 6 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0
The answers to the Russia Russia Russia hoax are coming into focus with the Epstein files… how Epstein, Thiel, and Bannon helped Trump win in 2016
betchesnews.substack.com/p/russiagate...
Lots of people have been saying "I can't believe the QAnon was right all along, they just got the wrong party!"
Yes... that was on purpose.
Did Trump and his allies invent Pizzagate to deflect from the Katie Johnson lawsuit to get him elected in 2016?
betchesnews.substack.com/p/pizzagate-...
What's funny about Trump lying about kicking Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago is that Jeffrey Epstein was never actually an official member, he was simply allowed to hang out there without paying for a membership because HIS BEST FRIEND, THE PRESIDENT, IS THE OWNER
17.02.2026 21:56 — 👍 30 🔁 7 💬 0 📌 1
It’s long been assumed that Jeffrey Epstein was a Mossad agent… but when Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced his government was investigating the Epstein Files, he said Epstein was running a KGB-backed compromise operation.
So what explains the decades of Mossad allegations?
Chefs like Adam Perry Lang are still untouched. It wasn't just “of its time.” Power has always known how to launder itself, while the same names keep resurfacing at banks, universities, and cocktail parties, as if nothing ever happened. @samisagesays.bsky.social @underthedesknews.bsky.social
10.02.2026 19:27 — 👍 22 🔁 7 💬 3 📌 3The Super Bowl halftime show is great. Conservatives are gonna hate it.
09.02.2026 01:27 — 👍 12 🔁 3 💬 0 📌 0
a great deal of what they have tried to cover up went back to the Katie Johnson case ... ground zero ... how you connect Epstein to Trump w/ a really serious credible accusation like that is a very straightforward corroborated story - @ @samisagesays.bsky.social on the @tarapalmeri.bsky.social show
08.02.2026 19:29 — 👍 4 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
@tarapalmeri.bsky.social: There's another email from someone I think it was Epstein saying, you know, Michael Cohen
knows everything
@samisagesays.bsky.social: You have to be pretty fucking thick to expect people to believe that he did not orchestrate the silencing of the Katie Johnson case
Epstein and his pals fixated on fertility, longevity, and ritual because they didn’t just want wealth — they wanted to be untouchable. Living gods. Immune from consequences. @underthedesknews.bsky.social @samisagesays.bsky.social
08.02.2026 19:46 — 👍 53 🔁 19 💬 4 📌 0thank you so much for trusting us 🥹 it's crazy how insane it all is and yet... it's all right there.
05.02.2026 22:32 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
I spent 6 days reading the Epstein Files. His impact was wide-reaching and long-lasting.
My analysis of the most dangerous landmines he left behind:
IF ONLY THE CREEPS IN THE EPSTEIN FILES WERE AS RELENTLESS ABOUT AGE VERIFICATION AS THE DOJ WEBSITE
01.02.2026 21:39 — 👍 54 🔁 11 💬 1 📌 0Hands small, Greenland big
15.01.2026 15:56 — 👍 10 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Spot the difference:
11.01.2026 23:41 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Something we take for granted is that the president has not one nice word for a dead American shot by the government, even if it were accidental
07.01.2026 23:06 — 👍 8 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
In a lot of ways this case was an affinity fraud. The President had people who built trust in him, including people in his own party, and he preyed on that."
…And ain't this the whole story?
I think the key part was Smith characterizing Trump's 2020 acts as AFFINITY FRAUD
"People commit crimes all the time using words. When someone commits an affinity fraud, you gain someone's trust and then you rip them off, you defraud them, that's all words, but not protected by the 1st Amendment…
Another delay tactic. Elon Musk owned Twitter by then.
03.01.2026 01:38 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Smith's team wanted to obtain records from Twitter through a nondisclosure order, but Twitter refused to give the records unless they could tell Trump that they were doing so
After lower courts ruled against them, Twitter tried to get the Supreme Court involved so they wouldn't have to comply.
Trump personally called Senators Hawley and Hagerty
03.01.2026 01:37 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Trump & Giuliani mixed up a bunch of republican senators' phone #s on Jan 5 while splitting up who they’d call to push to reject the election results
"The message they left for Senator Lee was meant for Senator Tuberville. And the message he left for Senator Sullivan... it was for another Senator"
“The Speaker of the House in Arizona. The Speaker of the House in Michigan. We had an elector in Pennsylvania who is a former Congressman who was going to be an elector for President Trump who said that what they were trying to do was an attempt to overthrow the government and illegal."
03.01.2026 01:34 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
JACK SMITH: "One of the strengths of our case & why we felt we had such strong proof is all witnesses weren’t going to be political enemies of the president, they were political allies
We had numerous witnesses say, 'I voted for Trump. I campaigned for Trump. I wanted him to win.'”
When asked why the DOJ didn't bring indictments against anyone else, Smith responded that Trump was the "most culpable and most responsible person" and that the Capitol riot (where 5 people died) "does not happen" without Trump. It was all in his service.
03.01.2026 01:31 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Fraud is not protected speech. He’s "not free to violate federal law and use knowingly false statements about election fraud to target a lawful government function"
Asked why the DOJ didn't indict anyone else, Trump was the "most culpable and most responsible person"
"I entirely disagree with any characterization that our work was in any way meant to hamper him in the election" -- Jack Smith
Smith drew the distinction between Trump's free speech right to claim he won the election, and the right to perpetuate a fraud.
They support a timeline with many of Trump's own allies calling him on Jan 6, begging him to call off the rioters—showing he knew what he was doing but refused to stop it until his staff repeatedly pushed
Republicans spent much time accusing Smith of being politically motivated by the 2024 election
Smith said they got the records in a manner consistent with law and DOJ policy, and they got the records to corroborate witness testimony about the sequence of events on January 6th
The phone records were key to proving Trump's intent to overturn the election and stop Congress from certifying it
There were a lot of questions on
- why his team needed the phone records
- what the DOJ was able to see (who called who, length of call) without informing them they obtained the records
- why did they subpoena the phone companies and not just ask, say, Mitch McConnell for his phone records? etc
