Trans Revolutionary Anarchist

Upshot of it is the only reliable experts on trans people and what we need are *trans people*

For them to treat us, they have to assume we're not healthy.

Ain't that a bitch.

So now there is decades of evidence that trans people are these very weird broken things that doctors imagined we were because the alternative was *they wouldn't help us*.

Doctors can't just treat us as authorities over our own bodies and minds. They're experts in treating ills after all.

Actual trans people started trying to access that. But lots got turned away for not being "really trans", i.e. not matching this invented trans person.

So they went away, researched it, shared notes, and came back and *lied*. Because why tell the truth when you know what the doctor wants to hear?

Sorry, bud.

Here's what happened: In the late 20th century, doctors invented a trans person. This trans person might have existed somewhere but it wasn't the usual trans person. Nevertheless, they created a regime to provide this trans person with all the gender medicine they needed. Then...

Screenshot of a table row with the following information: "Wes Streeting", "31/07/2024", "• Genspect • Bayswater Support Group • CAN-SG • Integrated Psychology Clinic • LGB Alliance • Transgender Trend", "To discuss gender policy issues".

Wes Streeting held a meeting with:

• Genspect
• Bayswater Support Group
• CAN-SG
• Integrated Psychology Clinic
• LGB Alliance
• Transgender Trend

"To discuss gender policy issues"

So they're repealing it?

Wikipedia challenged the UK's new Online Safety Act and lost, but may have set a new precedent for fighting the rules all the same The ruling "does not give Ofcom and the secretary of state a green light to implement a regime that would significantly impede Wikipedia’s operations."

https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/wikipedia-challenged-the-uks-new-online-safety-act-and-lost-but-may-have-set-a-new-precedent-for-fighting-the-rules-all-the-same/

Bookmarked for payday. Thanks a lot

Therefore we should abolish Parliament because passing any new laws must be immoral!

I need to watch both of those too gdi

I really need to get around to watching this

Makoto Shinkai really does have the stuff

Be weird if they do because that would mean that at some point in the past slavery was morally correct and then somehow became not so

Queer Authors Withdraw From Writing Prize En Masse Over Inclusion of Self-Proclaimed TERF — Assigned A UK LGBTQ+ writing prize seems to be crumbling as the queer community protests the inclusion of an anti-trans writer on the long list. Trans prisoners in Georgia accuse the state of cruel and unusual...

Mass revolt from queer authors in the UK after a major LGBTQ+ writing prize longlisted a self-proclaimed TERF.

11 authors and 2 judges have withdrawn from the Polari Prize. One of those withdrawals, that of June Thomas, is newly confirmed by our reporter, @evanurquhart.bsky.social.

Read more here:

If youre scared of transitioning

Transition just at home
Transition just with friends
Transition just with partners
Wear the cute things, learn fashion, learn what makes you happy

If it sucks you can stop

If you feel happier keep going

The point of life is to be happy that its worth the struggle

Really weird it's relevant for marriage though. There shouldn't be a separate document for if it's a same-sex marriage. They should all be conducted as Spouse 1 + Spouse 2, gender not entering into it.

I genuinely can't understand the point of view some people apparently have where "always follow the law" holds a higher moral imperative than "act in opposition to bad things"

I assume your answer is "yes" and that's why you haven't responded

I guess?!

I once heard it right after the vows as the bride and groom were greeting people and I'm like ??????

Incomplete list of songs I've heard played at weddings which are actually kind of hilarious choices:

- Go Your Own Way
- Good Riddance (Time Of Your Life)
- Mr. Brightside

Right so during the time when chattel slavery was legal in the USA, it was morally correct to capture an escaped slave and return them to their owner?

Guess not

🤔

But would you have admitted to it?

Well yeah, figured :3

Small-c communists believe in establishing a stateless, classless society built on the principle of communal ownership.

Big-C Communists are members of a particular Communist Party, usually a Marxist-Leninist or Trotskyist party.

And there's also a group that think you need to be their specific kind of communist/feminist or it doesn't count

They are really bad at telling between "I think you're wrong, therefore you're a moron" and "I think you're a moron, therefore you're wrong"

Probably because of the subtle difference between communism and Communism

And not even the interesting wrong one (the 12th century civil war between supporters of Stephen of Blois and Empress Matilda)