Doctor Dioxide really enjoyed this song @blackmariahtheater.bsky.social @loudwomen.org
15.02.2026 02:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0@olyaoliker.bsky.social
Europe & Central Asia Director @crisisgroup.org / Feminist / Migrant / ❤️ punk rock (but not only) / Opinions own / Endorsements clearly marked / https://www.crisisgroup.org/who-we-are/people/olga-oliker
Doctor Dioxide really enjoyed this song @blackmariahtheater.bsky.social @loudwomen.org
15.02.2026 02:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0The expiration yesterday of the New START Treaty ends formal limits on U.S. & Russian nuclear deployments. To mitigate the resulting dangers, Russia & the US can commit to remain under the previous limits & negotiate new treaties. Glad to have signed this @deepcutsproject.bsky.social statement.
06.02.2026 15:27 — 👍 3 🔁 1 💬 1 📌 0Doctor Dioxide (see prior post) also really enjoyed Kallemi's debut EP, Viajeras. The doctor likes it when music draws on a wide range of musical and cultural styles, plus, migration is, of course, a theme near and dear to her heart. @loudwomen.org
29.01.2026 14:20 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hi friends. Happy to announce that my alter ego, Doctor Dioxide (you'll figure it out) is writing about music with @loudwomen.org. The doctor thinks Kid Sophie's new single is pretty darn groovy
29.01.2026 14:17 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Even as fighting continues & Russian bombings leave civilians without heat, Ukrainian politics is back, both behind closed doors & more publicly. However the war unfolds, Mr. Zelenskyy must now think to the future. In this @crisisgroup.org commentary, @luciankim.bsky.social explains the dynamics.
29.01.2026 12:18 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Hence all the applause for Canadian PM Mark Carney at Davos. So, again. Read our explainer. By me, @mwhanna.crisisgroup.org & Marta Mucznik with help from @bcfinucane.bsky.social @lisamusiol.bsky.social & @alissadecarbonnel.bsky.social 10/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0But given a choice between an alliance that does as its strongest member says or suffers punishment vs becoming independent of that ally, the preference is surely for the latter. As they try to talk their way out of this crisis & prepare for the next, that is surely in the back of allied minds. 9/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0An alliance is of far less value if you can't trust your ally & they, indeed, threaten you. But it has some value as long as adversaries believe in it & it continues to provide military infrastructure for your defense needs. Break that, & there are an awful lot of gaps to fill, awfully fast 8/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0When it comes to making it stop, they have leverage, economic & military. There is also opposition in the US, though unclear if it would act. This time around, markets, which punished U.S. bonds and the dollar, also helped out. That's surely a warning to Washington for the future, as well. 7/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0But a demand for an ally's territory, whether by force or not, is an assault on sovereignty & territorial integrity. However negotiations sort out, hard to paper over. So, allies face the challenge of somehow making this stop while also retaining as much US as possible as long as possible. 6/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0This stuff isn't new, of course--it began in the 1st Trump administration & moved at dizzying speed in the first year of the 2nd. Allies have responded by trying to keep US as engaged as possible while they figure out how to reduce dependence, both to help Ukraine & to meet their own needs. 5/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0But the US shift on Ukraine, ending most assistance to the country at war, is the starkest example, in that it either rejects the NATO/EU/formerly US argument that Russia's war threatens European security interests writ large, or indicates that the US no longer cares. 4/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0The seeming disconnect between demanding an ally's territory and, well, being an ally could be explained in part by this administration in general backing away from the transatlantic security bargain of the past 80 yrs, with expressed doubts of NATO value, associated commitments, etc. 3/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Trump's desire for an ally's territory is tough to explain--US has great military leeway there now, & the local population is unenthusiastic, to say the least. His comments about "psychological" needs & USG narratives of hegemony & territorial acquisition for its own sake may be the core logic 2/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0At Davos, by saying he would not use force, Trump somewhat cooled a crisis engendered by his insistence the U.S. own Greenland. But the crisis continues, & however it sorts out, transatlantic relations are irrevocably altered. Our @crisisgroup.org pre-speech analysis lays it out 🧵 1/10
23.01.2026 14:02 — 👍 6 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0Did Donald Trump rule out use of force in his Davos speech? Not entirely clear, but he did not walk back from his demand for an ally's territory. @mwhanna.crisisgroup.org, Marta Mucznik, & I walk through the implications of this continuing crisis for the European & transatlantic security
21.01.2026 16:16 — 👍 7 🔁 5 💬 0 📌 0w/ @mwhanna.crisisgroup.org & Marta Mucznik, & big thanks to @bcfinucane.bsky.social, @lisamusiol.bsky.social & @alissadecarbonnel.bsky.social
21.01.2026 12:37 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0As Davos awaits Trump, my colleagues & I lay out what's at stake in the Greenland crisis & what might come next as European allies weigh the value of Donald Trump's United States & their options
21.01.2026 12:35 — 👍 6 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0Whether you are Ukraine or Denmark, it is imaginable that your leaders might decide to trade territory for security, though this would be a fraught & potentially unwise choice. It seems far less plausible to trade territory for wobbly commitments from unreliable actors.
18.01.2026 11:52 — 👍 6 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 0@crisisgroup.org
16.01.2026 15:58 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0On the first War & Peace podcast of 2026, @nathalietocci.bsky.social joins @alissadecarbonnel.bsky.social & me to talk U.S. actions in Venezuela, its threats to Greenland, & what's wrong (& right) with European security responses. Plus, multilateralism, what does it even look like now?
16.01.2026 14:21 — 👍 15 🔁 4 💬 1 📌 4Anyone else hear "like it or not" and translate it in their head to "нравится, не нравится"? Because, ya know, they literally mean the same thing.
14.01.2026 21:11 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
PSA:
--Anti-semitism, like other bigotries, is wrong whatever the political goals of the bigot.
--Bigotry from those in power is most dangerous.
--Bigotry from those out of power can be dangerous, too.
--Anti-semites & other bigots are not really liberal or progressive, whatever else they espouse.
Pleased to be in such erudite company in this strong piece by @sgutterman.bsky.social pulling together expert views on prospects for the Russo-Ukrainian war over the next year. Spoiler: none of us are optimistic we'll see a sustainable peace soon.
12.01.2026 20:37 — 👍 14 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 1You honor the victims of horrific violence by remembering them, and seeking accountability for crimes. You do not honor them by watching recordings of their suffering. Some people must, to make that accountability possible. But if you're not one of them, don't.
08.01.2026 22:54 — 👍 252 🔁 48 💬 29 📌 6Mia Hansen-Love rocks. That is all.
08.01.2026 21:30 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I think a good number of Ukrainians thought a full-scale Russian invasion was likely, Arestovych among them. But when it comes to hollowness of Russian forces, I think the problem there is that Western (& Ukrainian) analysts were using Russian assessments of their own capabilities. Which were wrong
07.01.2026 22:31 — 👍 13 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Congrats!
07.01.2026 16:49 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0You're looking for someone who was aware of the hollowness of the Russian armed forces as of February 2022?
07.01.2026 16:46 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0Um, not quite operational failure, but I don't think we did too badly, and I personally was I'm pretty sure on record saying that the invasion was likely. www.crisisgroup.org/europe-centr... & www.crisisgroup.org/europe-centr...
07.01.2026 15:38 — 👍 4 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0