This is one of the many reasons I love Minneapolis.

If Jeff Bezos could afford to spend $75 million on the Melania movie & $500 million for a yacht to sail off to his $55 million wedding to give his wife a $5 million ring, please don't tell me he needed to fire one-third of the Washington Post staff.

Democracy dies in oligarchy.

A retired Minneapolis couple who had guns pointed at them by ICE in a church parking lot.

"They were obviously not trained at all. I've known many police officers in my life. These people were right off the streets."

"They had the professional demeanor of criminals."

ht: @paulgraham.bsky.social

Thank you handsome

🤹‍♀️

It still makes me sick.

664 reactions · 307 shares | This administration is an organized criminal organization authorized by the Supreme Court of the United States! | Lloyd Miller This administration is an organized criminal organization authorized by the Supreme Court of the United States!

www.facebook.com/reel/2718696...

Cartoon by Nick Anderson

Looks more like a log!

So glad you made the switch to things too. Best choice!!!!

A definite clone is needed!

Speak Up Boldly Group
We knew this already, that he is a criminal and convicted felon, a cheat, con man and liar and totally unfit for office. But at least now this testimony is enshrined in congressional record.

To be clear.

YouTube video by Justin Wolfers Inflation, Wages, and Recession Risks: Justin Wolfers' Truthful Takes on Trump’s Talking Points

The President said some words last night about the economy. I'll help you figure out which ones were true.
youtu.be/xtHjvS9yv5g

www.vox.com The revealing pointlessness of Trump’s primetime speech

The revealing pointlessness of Trump’s primetime speech

Need to clone for Xmas!

Sadly relevant today.

🎩Get this POS outta the White House! 🇺🇸

FBI’s Frantic Scramble to Redact Epstein Files Revealed A trove of emails shows all-nighters and almost $1 million in overtime as Trumpworld debated releasing the Epstein files.

‼️‼️ Newly released emails show the FBI spent almost $1 million in overtime analyzing the Epstein files as part of an effort dubbed the “Special Redaction Project."

This is why a con man shouldn’t have been allowed to become President!
This 👇

Mark Kelly: "The message he sent a couple days ago was he declared that loyalty to the Constitution is now punishable by death. Those are serious words coming from the president. He's trying to intimidate us. But I'm not going to be intimidated."

The President of the United States is publicly calling for the political prosecution of his political opponents, urging the death penalty because they urged soldiers to uphold the rule of law.

This should be front page news everywhere. It is not, which tells much about how we got to this point.

The Coast Guard will no longer classify swastikas and nooses as hate symbols.

This action, coupled with the President's call to hang Democratic members of Congress - both in the past few hrs - are more than "potentially divisive."

They are vile, unconscionable, and dangerous.

The government respectfully submits this supplemental filing to correct the record regarding statements during the hearing held on November 19, 2025, before U.S. District Court Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff, suggesting an issue with the grand jury voting process on the indictment returned in Case No. 1:25-CR-272-MSN. The official transcript of the September 25, 2025, proceedings before Magistrate Judge Vaala conclusively refutes that claim and establishes that the grand jury voted on - and true-billed - the two-count indictment. I. The Court and the Foreperson Confirmed the Vote on the Two-Count Indictment The transcript contains the following direct exchange between the Court and the grand jury foreperson: THE COURT: Sorry, I didn't mean to interrupt you. 10 So you voted on the one that has the two counts? 11 THE FOREPERSON: Yes. See Transcript, Dkt No, 10, attached as Exhibit "A" at 4. This sworn testimony alone establishes that the grand jury voted on the two-count

This is nuts.

Yesterday in the Comey hearing, prosecutors *repeatedly* confirmed that the full grand jury never saw or voted on the two-count indictment.

Now they’re claiming the grand jury *did* vote on it.