Rebecca Robare's Avatar

Rebecca Robare

@robareowl.bsky.social

Scientist and writer, parent of twins, Sherlockian. PhD, Psychology/Cognitive Neuroscience, CUNY Graduate Center, 2010. https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1935/

1,240 Followers  |  2,013 Following  |  1,133 Posts  |  Joined: 09.10.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Rebecca Robare (@robareowl.bsky.social)

Such an amazing, dark, funny film. And yeah, not what you’d have thought you’d pick for prescience but here we are!

28.02.2026 21:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh I have to try that!

26.02.2026 17:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It was certainly the year that destroyed any glamour I thought the Ivies had.

25.02.2026 21:30 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I once worked for a professor once who insisted on grading on a curve so it would be β€œpsychometrically valid.” I could never figure out why the grades should compare the students against each other rather than compare each individual against the expectations of the course…

25.02.2026 21:27 β€” πŸ‘ 15    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

The mom reaction. Glad you were able to help!

22.02.2026 23:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

😱
That’s all I got. I just… I would be waiting for my upgrade robot body but the transhumanists are just…

22.02.2026 02:25 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Everyone’s talking about Orwell but Huxley’s in here, too.

21.02.2026 21:07 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Gonna start each day with Woody Guthrie recordings. All the verses of β€œThis Land is Your Land.”
(In my imaginary broadcast station, I guess.)

21.02.2026 13:08 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If he looked at the picture of the peanut and decided that β€œpeanut” does not start with β€œn”, he’s correct there, too! (Seriously I hate when kids’ worksheets do this.)

19.02.2026 23:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

FYI, this grant program is open to anyone communicating science.

It does not require that you went to school for science.

You could be a Ph.D. student, an artist, a community organizer, a teacher, or any other profession. As long as you are communicating science IRL in the US, you're eligible.

18.02.2026 19:10 β€” πŸ‘ 135    πŸ” 98    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 2

Oh, and dean of students at my kids’ school is Mr. Risk.

18.02.2026 02:30 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

There’s a chiropractor nearby named Dr. Tickle.

18.02.2026 02:29 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

β€œSecret ballots, not secret police!” would not be the worst slogan I’ve heard.

16.02.2026 22:03 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Now I need someone to explain why this feels like some sort of personal failure. The studies you included are not the studies you cited! Nobody could make sense of that!

16.02.2026 17:12 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I have spent 3 days trying to figure out this systematic review.
I want to say I don’t get paid enough to do other people’s work for them, but I don’t know that there is a rate at which I would accept having to do work that authors and editors should have done before publication.

16.02.2026 16:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a cartoon character with red hair is sitting at a table with her hands on her chin . Alt: Merida, an animated Disney princess with a lot of curly red hair, drops her head to the table in despair.

Systematic review lists a study as having 42 patients in a 3-way comparison.
The study they reference has 6 patients in a single-arm study.
Do researchers read the studies they cite?
And these days, I have to wonder if they used AI.

16.02.2026 16:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

::makes popcorn::

13.02.2026 21:44 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I had the grocery store all figured out, but then…

13.02.2026 19:02 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Another day, another systematic review. Inclusion criteria: RCT. So far 2 studies are not randomized. Countless abstracts of included studies don’t give n per group. What are we even doing here?

13.02.2026 16:25 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I need to see this cut. I had a photo illustrated Star Wars Storybook way back in the 80s that had the Biggs part in it because it was finalized before SW was released! I am glad for Biggs to be revealed to the world.

13.02.2026 15:21 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This anthology looks awesome. Back it with me?

13.02.2026 02:37 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I recognize and salute your victory!

12.02.2026 17:51 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If all you want is a neural net that’s pretty good at sorting things into cats/not-cats, you can get it small enough that you can know all the weights! I was doing that 20 years ago and I get real angry at these guys who either don’t know how their machines work or think no one else possibly could!

11.02.2026 18:44 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Great metaphor to explain complexity, btw!

11.02.2026 18:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Beautiful and powerful work

09.02.2026 23:27 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I remember her amazing skating - she was so strong and beautiful and you are absolutely correct about the way she was treated. (Like, obv you don’t need my validation, I am adding data for the forgetful.)

09.02.2026 23:24 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

My kids enjoy it these days - some things never get old.

08.02.2026 22:24 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It would be an interesting (though time-consuming) art project to take a soc textbook and cut out everything that would need to be censored with an xacto knife. Just to demonstrate.

08.02.2026 16:11 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Quick, get Penguin Classics on it

08.02.2026 16:05 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It could be the cover of Arrowsmith

08.02.2026 15:59 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0