Tedious Soapbox's Avatar

Tedious Soapbox

@lichaat.bsky.social

#FPGA | #ASIC | #RISC-V | #Verilog | #RoaLogic

156 Followers  |  16 Following  |  753 Posts  |  Joined: 16.01.2025  |  2.3888

Latest posts by lichaat.bsky.social on Bluesky

That’s inherent in hot-air systems. We have a gas burning furnace and it does the same. It’s the cold air in the ducts that needs to be pushed out before the hot air.

12.11.2025 13:51 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Not just Trump, but also the fascist groups in Europe. Problem is that goes directly against freedom of speech.

12.11.2025 13:26 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No idea if it’s a good and safe car, but it sure is good looking

12.11.2025 04:00 β€” πŸ‘ 9    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Dirty Jobs with Mike Rowe

11.11.2025 19:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Ignorance is no excuse for stupidity

11.11.2025 18:59 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In fact, he was impeached twice

11.11.2025 17:59 β€” πŸ‘ 16    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

28% (2018 survey) of Americans believe the sun rotates around the earth. Your 100million is probably very accurate.

11.11.2025 05:14 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Something odd with these two lions

11.11.2025 04:58 β€” πŸ‘ 29    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

It’s better than only one pair of each animal. But then who considers the Bible a factual book anyways?

11.11.2025 04:47 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Also the book of Genesis specifies that only land dwelling animals should be taken. Therefore insects and invertebrates were probably excluded.
I have seen a study which claims the total number of animals on the ark was 6,744

11.11.2025 04:45 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Not true, the ark took seven pairs of each clean animal and bird and one pair of each unclean animal and bird.

11.11.2025 04:39 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Not really sure what argument you’re making here. Social-democratic and democratic-socialism are two reasonably well defined terms (as much as you can define any economic political movements).
I absolutely prefer social-democratic over democratic-socialism.

10.11.2025 15:18 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Facts hurt huh?!

10.11.2025 14:42 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Oh, the GOP calls it … who cares what the GOP calls it. It’s social-democratic. Let’s stick to facts and use the correct terms here.

10.11.2025 14:41 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Scandinavian model is social-democratic capitalism, not democratic-socialist.

10.11.2025 02:31 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

If you named any European countries, then you were wrong. Most European countries have a social-democracy. That’s very different than democratic-socialism.

09.11.2025 20:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Most Americans have no idea what communism, socialism, democratic-socialism, and social-democracy are.

09.11.2025 20:51 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

No, democratic socialism does not work. What works is social-democracy. Please learn the difference

09.11.2025 20:50 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

My dog is so dumb, I would be embarrassed if he could speak. Speechless he’s utterly adorable though.

09.11.2025 20:10 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Car salesman tried to sell me a RAM pickup. Me: does it fit a full sheet of plywood? He looked absurdly dumbfounded. Obviously it doesn’t fit. So what’s the point? These things are way too high for comfortable work. I really want one of the older 70/80s pickups; purposeful and much better looking .

09.11.2025 18:15 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

In his defense, he also says β€œI don’t know” a lot.

07.11.2025 07:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He acts like it’s a bad thing?!

07.11.2025 07:00 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

German food banks that is. Paid for by German private donations. So much for Make America Great Again and America First.

07.11.2025 06:48 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

You should be worried about socialism. You wouldn’t want socialism anymore than trumpism/fascism. What you want is a social democracy

07.11.2025 00:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Most European countries, which including Sweden, are social democracies, not democratic socialist. Where social does not mean socialism/socialist.

07.11.2025 00:02 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes

06.11.2025 15:55 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This concept enables representation over a wider range of topics. Imagine there’s 100 seats. And there’s an animal rights party. In a direct representative system it’s impossible for that party to get any seats. However in the entire state there are probably enough voters to get them 1 or 2 seats.

06.11.2025 15:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

That depends on how the parties fill that in.
In other countries with that concept, the members of the party determine the list of electable candidates. And they’re from all over the state/country. Thus preventing a cluster of representatives.

06.11.2025 15:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Yes

06.11.2025 14:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Like you just did?
If you’re opposed to such behavior, as I am, then why do it yourself?

05.11.2025 16:48 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

@lichaat is following 15 prominent accounts