That was fun, thanks. His monophthongized /eɪ/ and /oʊ/ made me think he was latino, as many suggested, but I was thrown off by his “different to,” which suggests a British influence. Minnesota/Wisconsin makes sense for these features, but only after the fact ;)
03.03.2026 19:04 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
YouTube video by Evan Edinger
The Strange Rules of America's Most Confusing Accent
“The strange rules of America’s most confusing accent” by Evan Edinger (Feb. ’26) www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec0-...
03.03.2026 06:51 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Gricean maxxing
03.03.2026 03:07 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
The highlighted example suggests freedom vs. un+freedom, but grammatically, the latter must be unfree+dom. It’s interesting, because phonologically I also prefer the compound-like un+freedom, as opposed to suffixing -dom to the compound-like unfree
01.03.2026 19:55 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
If Wells is right that <aer> causes speakers to go for a long vowel, I imagine there are speakers out there who disyllabify it: /ˈmeɪ̯.əɹsk/. The final unstressed rhyme -əɹsk is still pretty crazy for English! (Cf. Simbirsk, now Ulyanovsk, which I imagine was /sɪmˈbɜɹsk/ or /ˈsɪmˌbɜɹsk/ in English?)
01.03.2026 17:37 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Maersk is /mɛɹsk/ for me, which has a crazy enough rhyme, but Wells (2008) claims that the vowel is also long (as in Mary): /mɛəɹsk/ (Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, 3rd edn.)
01.03.2026 17:18 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Also via dan-sk: Maersk’s a Danish company. I mean, c’mon: [mɛəɹ̠sks]
01.03.2026 17:06 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
27.02.2026 23:39 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Btw, rhotic dialects have more of these exceptional antepenultimate cases, e.g. ‘allergen’ /(ˈæ.lǝɹʤn)/ → /(ˈæ.lǝɹ).ʤn/. Incidentally the serial approach feels especially abstract to me with final [i], e.g., ‘cavalry’ /(ˈkævǝlɹj)/ → /(ˈkævǝl)ɹi/—but it works at explaining ə-final stems; cf. *CAvalra
27.02.2026 16:27 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
In rhotic areas like mine, it’s about ə-final words, which is why serialists do stuff like “regular penultimate” /(ˈkæ.ləndɹ̠)/ → “irregular surface antepenultimate” /(ˈkæ.lən).dɹ̠/; cf. */ˈkæləndə/. That strong intuition of mine is probably unlearnable and therefore untenable in non-rhotic varieties
27.02.2026 16:15 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Cool! Thanks
27.02.2026 14:15 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I'm from the US midwest, with some southern traits; for me, these are syllabic L:
[pʰɫ̩z], [pʰɫ̩s]
[ʃɫ̩ts], [ʃɫ̩z]
[ˈbɫ̩zˌwɫ̩], [ˈbɫ̩bɫ̩]
[pʰɫ̩pɪʔ], [pʰɫ̩pɪŋ]
[ˈbɫ̩ˌhɛɾ], [ˈbɫ̩ˌkɛɾ]
[ˈbɫ̩jɪ̈n], [ˈbɫ̩d͡ʒɪŋ]
[ˈbɫ̩mɪ̈n], [ˈbɫ̩bɪ̈s]
27.02.2026 08:41 —
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Verb ellipsis klaxon:
[characters discuss marriage]
'Ever been?'
'Married? No.'
#linguistics
26.02.2026 20:24 —
👍 22
🔁 1
💬 3
📌 0
Love it. Far more natural than the crass “would” meme
27.02.2026 07:33 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Open access source: “Redefining the Epiclassic Period in Mesoamerica: Proceedings of the Copenhagen Roundtable” ed. by Claudia I. Alvarado León and Christophe Helmke (Feb. ’26) www.archaeopress.com/Archaeopress...
27.02.2026 07:20 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
“Grosso modo” map of the hypothesized distribution of language families and isolates in Mesoamerica during the Classic period (c. ad 1–550) from “The linguistic panorama of the epiclassic: placing Nahuan among the languages of western Mesoamerica” by @magnuspharao.bsky.social Hansen (Feb. ’26)
27.02.2026 07:20 —
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
“My” dictionary, too, only reports (completely ungrammatical) /ˈjɑɹməlkə/, as opposed to actual /ˈjɑməkə/
27.02.2026 07:00 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
‘yarmulke’ is /ˈjɑ(ɹ)mʊlkə/ or /ˈjɑ(ɹ)məlkə/ in several dictionaries, but the initial stress here is quite ungrammatical in English phonology unless the /l/ is dropped. English could potentially manage a pseudocompound like /ˈjɑɹˌmʊlkə/ or /ˈjɑɹˌmʌlkə/, but no dictionary reports such pronunciations
27.02.2026 06:53 —
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Nice! Would you be comfortable sharing the general region of your accent?
27.02.2026 05:16 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Another quandary? The antecedent lies outside the clause with the reflexive, so non-reflexive ‘him’ might be better, unless ‘looking’ is weirdly high-adjoined, but the man joined his own search party, so he’s semantically tauto-clausal with ‘himself,’ but ‘search party’ would weirdly favour ‘itself’
27.02.2026 02:27 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Does you variety have the BULL–HULL merger? If so, please humour me and try these near-minimal pairs:
pulls vs. pulse
Schul(t)z vs. Shull’s (US physicist)
bullswool vs. bulbal
pulpit vs. pulping
bullhead vs. bulkhead
bullion vs. bulging
Bul(l)man vs. bulbous
27.02.2026 01:36 —
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 3
📌 1
Second-greatest repeat Columbo villain Patrick McGoohan’s sublime rendering here is second only to pronouncing the game as 麻雀兒 /mo²² t͡ɕiã⁵³/ = “sparrow” + nasalized erhua diminutive in the 上海吳语 Shanghainese Wu of the Yangtze Delta where the game originated.
26.02.2026 14:45 —
👍 1
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
Whoa
26.02.2026 15:56 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Ha, the speaker is in/from Toronto, so it’s possible. Btw:
26.02.2026 15:55 —
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0