Sidsy

YouTube video by BlackBeltBarrister MPs Are Misleading the public! Utterly Infuriating

That is not what the High Court decided at all. Why are you, and the ignorant MPs swallowing your spin, lying to the public? Is this pure incompetence on your part or wilful disinformation?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PPv...

Disinformation and The Good Law Project Public discussion of the law relating to sex and gender identity is often polarised.

That is disinformation put out by GLP. The High Court made no finding that anything in the interim update was unlawful. It made no findings in relation to the EHRC Code of Practice which is awaiting a decision from Bridget Phillipson.
knowingius.org/p/disinforma...

Disinformation and The Good Law Project Public discussion of the law relating to sex and gender identity is often polarised.

That is disinformation put out by GLP. The High Court made no finding that anything in the interim update was unlawful. It made no findings in relation to the EHRC Code of Practice which is awaiting a decision from Bridget Phillipson.
knowingius.org/p/disinforma...

Disinformation and The Good Law Project Public discussion of the law relating to sex and gender identity is often polarised.

It's not legally complex at all. It is very simple. Workplaces MUST provide single-sex facilities. Service providers do not have to but if they do, then access is based on biological sex. Don't believe GLPs disinformation.
knowingius.org/p/disinforma...

You've missed the "Decapitate terfs", "Punch a terf", "The only good terf is a dead terf" placards then? The calls for violence against women?
terfisaslur.com

This post is misleading. No final decision has been made that "Hampstead ponds will remain trans inclusive".
Sex Matters were refused permission for a JR on procedural grounds. The consultation merely 'informs' the corporation.
Their lawyers know, as you do, that they cannot ignore the SC judgment

Of course it did. Those with the PC of GR rightly have the same protections against discrimination as any other PC.
That, as noted in today's tribunal judgment, does not mean they are entitled to use single-sex spaces of their choice.

".. other than when it is used in the provisions of the EA 2010"
Exactly. The SC judgment in April was about the meaning of the words 'man', 'woman' and 'sex' IN THE EQUALITY ACT.
Contrary to your assertion here.

bsky.app/profile/sids...

It is difficult to take this seriously when you do not actually know the issue that was decided by the SC last April.

Statement on the Charity Commission The Good Law Project has said that the Charity Commission has opened an “investigation” into Sex Matters.  A routine regulatory compliance case was

sex-matters.org/posts/update...

SC dealt with this in great detail. See para 153 onwards.
If Parliament had intended to create a hierarchy of trans people under the PC of GR (those with and those without a GRC), and to conflate 'GR' with 'Sex', it could have said so in the legislation. It did not. supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc...

2/2
The Single Sex Exceptions specifically allowed for discrimination on the basis of GR, regardless of GRC.

This reflects Parliament’s drafting choice not to link the two statutes. Parliament *could* have cross-referenced the GRA in 2010 — but deliberately did not.

1/2
The GRA (2004) is about legal status for some purposes (birth certificates, marriage, pensions).

The Equality Act (2010) is about anti-discrimination rules and exceptions.

The PC of GR protects ALL trans people, regardless of GRC status.

Girl Guides have finally had to admit that the inclusion of boys in an organisation set up specifically for girls is unlawful under the EA and in contravention of their charitable objects.

Your argument re. GRCs is completely irrelevant.

The EA states: 'man' = "a male of any age"; 'woman' = "a female of any age".
The SC said that 'man' and 'woman' refers to biological sex.
Everyone without a GRC has *always* been legally their biological sex.
The SC ruling changed nothing re. under 18s. Trans girls were always legally boys.

Goodness, imagine daring to decide which charitable causes you want to donate your own money to? And only giving away £200 million so far, mainly to help vulnerable women and children.
Lumos helps children around the world. Volant also covers international projects.
But still .... what a bitch.

Interesting. SM posted about attempts to take their life
- when Scotsman published an article
- after de-selection
- when JKR shared an image
Yet has never claimed SP drove him to such an attempt due to her 'wicked harassment' (until now). Even in his first failed complaint about her to the BSB.

Just going to ignore the Volant Trust, Beira's Place and Lumos?

volanttrust.org

"..the Supreme Court ruling, which is not the law"

Oh dear, Alice. I think you need to ask your boss at the GLP about the role of the Supreme Court.

Can you explain how you think that an Employment Tribunal decision, in relation to the Equality Act, is in any way relevant to someone tweeting about a public figure? Is the barrister here "Kate"s employer or work colleague? Or providing Kate with goods or services?

ALLISON BAILEY WINS FIRST EVER GENDER CRITICAL JUDGMENT IN THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES — Allison Bailey You may have seen news reports that I have been engaged in litigation with my former vets.   I am pleased to let you know that I have won my case against Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, trading as Palmer...

That's good. They won't have a problem paying the damages awarded to Allison Bailey, then.
allisonbailey.co.uk/updates/alli...

Two men jailed after being found guilty of multiple child sex offences Two men who were found guilty of multiple child sex offences earlier this year are both facing prison sentences following a hearing at Guildford Crown Court today (30 June).

You should correct this. The '13 years' came from an original incorrect report from a PA new agency reporter. Ireland has been sentenced to 24 years in jail with a further 6 years on extended licence.
www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/...

Don't be ridiculous. EVERYONE visiting Parliament has to queue and go through airport-style security. I've done it a number of times. Only trans activists would expect to be treated differently from other people and claim victimhood if they are not.

And that includes Labour voting women.

Sarah is the Chair of the WOMEN and Equalities Committee. And the majority of women do not want trans women in their spaces or sports, per yougov.

👍😁

Yes, I am agreeing with you!

Nope. The legislation/guidance around Boards gave rise to the appeal. The subject matter of the appeal heard by the SC was:

Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?

Stonewall responds to the FA and Scottish FA’s decision to ban trans… The FA and Scottish FA’s decision to ban trans women from women’s football has been made too soon, before the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling…

I see you have deleted your post from yesterday claiming - falsely - that the SC ruling has not "become law" but have not removed this statement from your website. When do you plan to do so?
www.stonewall.org.uk/news/stonewa...