Sidsy

Goodness, imagine daring to decide which charitable causes you want to donate your own money to? And only giving away £200 million so far, mainly to help vulnerable women and children.
Lumos helps children around the world. Volant also covers international projects.
But still .... what a bitch.

Interesting. SM posted about attempts to take their life
- when Scotsman published an article
- after de-selection
- when JKR shared an image
Yet has never claimed SP drove him to such an attempt due to her 'wicked harassment' (until now). Even in his first failed complaint about her to the BSB.

Just going to ignore the Volant Trust, Beira's Place and Lumos?

volanttrust.org

"..the Supreme Court ruling, which is not the law"

Oh dear, Alice. I think you need to ask your boss at the GLP about the role of the Supreme Court.

Can you explain how you think that an Employment Tribunal decision, in relation to the Equality Act, is in any way relevant to someone tweeting about a public figure? Is the barrister here "Kate"s employer or work colleague? Or providing Kate with goods or services?

ALLISON BAILEY WINS FIRST EVER GENDER CRITICAL JUDGMENT IN THE SUPPLY OF GOODS AND SERVICES — Allison Bailey You may have seen news reports that I have been engaged in litigation with my former vets.   I am pleased to let you know that I have won my case against Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, trading as Palmer...

That's good. They won't have a problem paying the damages awarded to Allison Bailey, then.
allisonbailey.co.uk/updates/alli...

Two men jailed after being found guilty of multiple child sex offences Two men who were found guilty of multiple child sex offences earlier this year are both facing prison sentences following a hearing at Guildford Crown Court today (30 June).

You should correct this. The '13 years' came from an original incorrect report from a PA new agency reporter. Ireland has been sentenced to 24 years in jail with a further 6 years on extended licence.
www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/...

Don't be ridiculous. EVERYONE visiting Parliament has to queue and go through airport-style security. I've done it a number of times. Only trans activists would expect to be treated differently from other people and claim victimhood if they are not.

And that includes Labour voting women.

Sarah is the Chair of the WOMEN and Equalities Committee. And the majority of women do not want trans women in their spaces or sports, per yougov.

👍😁

Yes, I am agreeing with you!

Nope. The legislation/guidance around Boards gave rise to the appeal. The subject matter of the appeal heard by the SC was:

Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?

Stonewall responds to the FA and Scottish FA’s decision to ban trans… The FA and Scottish FA’s decision to ban trans women from women’s football has been made too soon, before the implications of the Supreme Court’s ruling…

I see you have deleted your post from yesterday claiming - falsely - that the SC ruling has not "become law" but have not removed this statement from your website. When do you plan to do so?
www.stonewall.org.uk/news/stonewa...

It IS the law. And it has been since 2010.

bsky.app/profile/sids...

bsky.app/profile/sids...

bsky.app/profile/sids...

Oh dear 🤦
It is you relying on Google, sweetie. That screenshot is from the National *ARCHIVES*.
Maybe try more 'authoritative' sources - such as Press for Change (you know, an actual trans lobby group).
You are embarrassing yourself.
www.pfc.org.uk/olderleglisl...

I'm just letting people know that you are peddling false information and do not understand UK law. I will let them decide for themselves. My work here is done.
bsky.app/profile/sids...

Of course they are still protected under multiple categories - the same as everyone else.
Are you speaking today as a lawyer, medical doctor, consultant psychiatrist, surgeon, endocrinologist or a commercial pilot?
You were found out on X and got banned. Now you're lying on here. 🤡

Probably few know about it now because it is not the law now 😁
Apparently, you were not aware of that.

6. Trans people are still protected from discrimination under the protected characteristic of "gender reassignment". This does not, however, give them any "right" to be treated as the opposite biological sex.

5. The EHRC produces mandatory Codes of Practice. Whilst not the actual law, they can be cited in any discrimination case. Employers/service providers must follow the guidance or risk being sued.

4. The case before the SC was whether a GRC changed your sex for the purposes of the EA. It ruled that it does not and never has. This is the law. Sex means biological sex. ALL males are excluded from female-only services.

3. Schedule 3, p 28 also allowed trans people to be excluded from SSS (lawful gender reassignment discrimination).

2. Trans people without a GRC were *always* legally their birth sex under the Equality Act and could be excluded from single-sex services under Schedule 3, p27 of the EA (lawful sex discrimination.

My advice to anyone reading this nonsense from "Dr Isobel" is to ignore every word. She clearly knows nothing about UK law or the SC ruling.
1. The Sex Discrimination Act was *repealed*. All discrimination now comes under the Equality Act 2010.