Erica Rodriguez, PhD's Avatar

Erica Rodriguez, PhD

@ericarodriguez.bsky.social

Neuroscientist at Columbia studying the influence of our social environment on our emotions | NIGMS MOSAIC K99/R00 Scholar | ISFS Fellow | PhD in Affective Pain at Duke | Latina

1,316 Followers  |  1,000 Following  |  43 Posts  |  Joined: 25.09.2023  |  1.9986

Latest posts by ericarodriguez.bsky.social on Bluesky

Preview
Trump Administration Puts New Chokehold on Billions in Health-Research Funding The National Institutes of Health can’t award grants to outside researchers under a new White House restriction.

The NIH can’t award ANY grants to outside researchers under new WH restriction, reports @wsj.com.

The pause came in the form of a footnote from OMB Director Vought, in a document that doles out federal funds to the NIH.

Prelude to rescissions, especially after his comments over the weekend?

30.07.2025 00:44 β€” πŸ‘ 159    πŸ” 122    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 28
Video thumbnail

On Thursday, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to grant them a stay on the Massachusetts vs Kennedy/ APHA vs NIH ruling. This decision will occur on the shadow docket, with no formal hearing.

27.07.2025 00:02 β€” πŸ‘ 95    πŸ” 77    πŸ’¬ 6    πŸ“Œ 13

πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡

22.07.2025 17:33 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Public comment on this new "no animal only studies" is open here:

www.fda.gov/news-events/...

It closes next Monday.

08.07.2025 19:32 β€” πŸ‘ 17    πŸ” 22    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 3
Preview
NIH announces end to funding for animal-only studies - Drug Discovery and Development Drug Discovery and Development covers strategies and technologies related to pharmaceutical research and development and drug formulation.

The end of biomedical sciences has finally arrived: NIH announces end to funding for animal-only studies www.drugdiscoverytrends.com/nih-announce...

08.07.2025 02:10 β€” πŸ‘ 26    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 12

The full ruling explaining why NIH grant cuts are illegal came out today.

It's just as blistering as the judge's oral remarks. And it uncovers fresh details in DOGE's role orchestrating the cuts β€” and on the cuts at Columbia.

Here are my top highlights from the 103-page ruling. 🧡

02.07.2025 23:54 β€” πŸ‘ 1438    πŸ” 652    πŸ’¬ 13    πŸ“Œ 29

Sometimes you don’t realize the full burden you’ve been carrying –of being implicitly treated as a second-class citizen whose life isn’t worth preserving, of people working to fix health inequalities in this country being persecuted, of the crushing *silence* around it – until someone calls it out.

16.06.2025 19:29 β€” πŸ‘ 211    πŸ” 51    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

An NIH staffer reacts to today's ruling:
"I'm looking forward to the day that we are so slammed with work trying to reinstate everything that we had to terminate illegally β€” I'll work 24/7 to make that happen if I can."

16.06.2025 22:24 β€” πŸ‘ 1125    πŸ” 297    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 15

BREAKING: A federal judge reversed National Institutes of Health's terminations of hundreds of critical research grants that were canceled because of their alleged connection to disfavored topics, including diversity, equity, inclusion, and gender identity.

This is a major win for public health.

16.06.2025 21:46 β€” πŸ‘ 33215    πŸ” 8461    πŸ’¬ 378    πŸ“Œ 414

On terminated DEI-related grants, including mine. We are taking a step in the right direction here.

16.06.2025 19:01 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Judge Young says he expects that the government will quickly comply with his order in this case.

To clarify: he's vacating the grant terminations at issue. And wants the money to start flowing ASAP.

Of note: the universe of grants "at issue" in this case is in dispute and will be litigated further

16.06.2025 18:19 β€” πŸ‘ 546    πŸ” 82    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 7

βš–οΈ HUGE day today in the NIH terminations cases

There's a trial (of sorts) at 10a ET in Boston today for arguments that NIH unlawfully terminated 100s of grants.

It's a 3 hour hearing and I'll post periodic updates.

Of note: this is the 1st lawsuit filed against the Trump Admin to go to trial.

16.06.2025 14:00 β€” πŸ‘ 404    πŸ” 142    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 16

Some of us MOSAIC scholars (myself included) still haven't even received our official grant termination... These games they're playing with us, & now, "you have the opportunity to write another grant instead of finishing the research work/writing the paper that will get you hired". Thin gruel indeed

29.05.2025 10:39 β€” πŸ‘ 37    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 1

Especially since most of us probably don't meet the eligibility requirements for these K's anymore. 🫠 And also the fact that we may not even get awarded on these second applications..........

29.05.2025 12:25 β€” πŸ‘ 41    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

note that 7 out of 10 listed here are training mechanisms

22.05.2025 16:34 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Judge comments: β€œAre you meaning to tell me the NIH policy is now homogeneity, inequity, and exclusion?” πŸ‘€

22.05.2025 17:20 β€” πŸ‘ 20    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

My thought when, in the wake of mass grant cancellations, administrators said it's important that we continue applying for grants (including from the very agencies canceling them).

17.05.2025 22:32 β€” πŸ‘ 387    πŸ” 61    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 5
Erica Rodriguez, PhD

Erica Rodriguez, PhD

What’s at stake when scientific research funds are cut? Our own @ericarodriguez.bsky.social talks about the grant canceled for her work on social behaviors (with autism and schizophrenia ties) and the impact on her career.
@gothamist.com
tinyurl.com/yc34c64b

15.05.2025 15:07 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 8    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"Women are PIs on 58% of the canceled grants, although they are PIs on only 34% of all active NSF grants.

Similarly, Blacks are PIs on 17% of the terminated grants, although they make only 4% of the total pool. Hispanic PIs and those with disabilities were twice as likely to lose a grant."

13.05.2025 22:09 β€” πŸ‘ 1293    πŸ” 952    πŸ’¬ 32    πŸ“Œ 67
Preview
Trump’s β€˜fear factor’: Scientists go silent as funding cuts escalate Many worry about retribution. But for others, speaking out is worth the risk

"Scientists might also be realizing that there’s little safety in silence."
#SpeakOut

www.science.org/content/arti...

13.05.2025 00:33 β€” πŸ‘ 53    πŸ” 19    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Judge Young:

A couple requests going forward:
- Please provide a list of grants actually affected (I HAVE THIS!!!)

- To HHS lawyer, "I understand gov't is against DEI. But this is about healthcare for all Americans. "Respectfully, I just don't know what [DEI] means" here. I need a definition.

08.05.2025 16:24 β€” πŸ‘ 47    πŸ” 13    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 4

A US judge to govt lawyers defending the NIH's grant terminations:

"I understand the administration is against DEI. Respectfully, I just don't know what you mean. This isn't a teasing question. There has to be some working definition.

This is research to advance healthcare for all our citizens."

08.05.2025 16:27 β€” πŸ‘ 1021    πŸ” 277    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 17
Rapid Response Research Awards | Evidence for Action

All, if you've had your federally-funded research disrupted due to the admin's chaos, consider this funding opportunity from Robert Wood Johnson:

Rapid Response Research

Rapid Response Research awards are exclusively available to applicants who have already received federal funding... πŸ§ͺ🧡

03.05.2025 16:37 β€” πŸ‘ 191    πŸ” 110    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 7
Leading Life Science Organizations: Unlawful Grant Terminations Pose Grave Threat to America’s Innovation Pipeline - ASCB Amicus Brief Filed in Support of Suit Calling for Immediate Funding Restoration WASHINGTON, DC – Four leading life science organizations, including the ASCB, filed an amicus brief today asking the cou...

Unlawful grant terminations are harming young scientists and threatening innovation. ASCB joins leaders calling for immediate funding restoration.

www.ascb.org/society-news...

02.05.2025 19:03 β€” πŸ‘ 144    πŸ” 72    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 7

Encouraging to see this show of force and solidarity from the societies that support the development of MOSAIC scholars

02.05.2025 18:53 β€” πŸ‘ 13    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

It is discrimination at it's finest.

28.04.2025 20:26 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This program's termination along with terminations of other programs (MARC U-STAR, RISE, PREP, diversity F awards, etc...) that award scientists who perform merited science will set back generations of scientists from marginalized backgrounds. 4/n

28.04.2025 01:18 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
As a diversity grant dies, young scientists fear it will haunt their careers The Trump administration defunded the National Institute of Health's MOSAIC grant program, which launched the careers of scientists from diverse backgrounds.

A group of scholars and I had a chance to share our experiences with the MOSAIC program being terminated πŸ§ͺ

www.npr.org/sections/sho...

28.04.2025 12:16 β€” πŸ‘ 33    πŸ” 18    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

And while our K99s are being terminated, the parent K99s are not, and this is intentionally disproportionally affecting scientists from and who support diverse backgrounds. This, to me, is a form of discrimination. 3/n

28.04.2025 01:10 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Our K99s were reviewed with parent k99s in the same study sections, and graded the same way, with the additional grading on service impact. What this means is that getting the MOSAIC K99 is just as competitive, if not more, than the parent K99. 2/n

28.04.2025 01:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

@ericarodriguez is following 20 prominent accounts