8. For UPDATES and more accountability journalism that follows the money, subscribe to Popular Information.
No corporate overlords. No false equivalencies. No BS.
popular.info/subscribe
8. For UPDATES and more accountability journalism that follows the money, subscribe to Popular Information.
No corporate overlords. No false equivalencies. No BS.
popular.info/subscribe
7. More on the money behind the new Iran War in today's Popular Information
02.03.2026 13:39 β π 150 π 29 π¬ 2 π 3
6. The new Iran War also comes weeks after PIF financed a $7 billion development deal in Saudi Arabia with the Trump Organization.
The Trump-branded hotel and golf course is part of Diriyah, a $63 billion development funded entirely by PIF.
5. The UAE is another backer of Kushner, investing about $200 million with his firm.
Days before the inauguration, the UAE purchased 49% of World Liberty Financial, a crypto company owned by Trump and Witkoff
The purchase netted the Trump family $187 million and the Witkoff family $31 million
4. After raising billions for the Saudis and other foreign governments, Kushner dismissed concerns about conflicts of interest, pledging he would not be involved in Trumpβs second term.
Once Trump took office, he abandoned that pledge and said his financial conflicts made him more effective.
3. In 2021, Saudi Arabia invested $2 billion in Kushner's private equity fund and has paid him $125 million+ in management fees.
The Saudis also partnered with Kushner to purchase video game maker EA, the largest leveraged buyout in history.
2. Despite the glaring conflicts-of-interest, Trump installed Kushner as a top negotiator with Iranian officials.
Kushner and Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff participated in a mediation session with their Iranian counterparts on Thursday, billed as a last-ditch effort to avoid war.
1. According to multiple reports both Saudi Arabia and the UAE lobbied Trump to attack Iran.
Both countries have increased their influence with Trump by investing billions in projects that personally enrich Trump and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner.
βIf Kamala wins, only death and destruction await because she is the candidate of endless wars. I am the candidate of peace. I am peace.β - Trump, 11/1/24
βIβm not going to start a war, Iβm going to stop wars.β - Trump, 11/5/24
Just a reminder: instead of an actual diplomat, we sent Trumpβs deeply compromised son-in-law as the lead negotiator to avert war with Iran.
popular.info/p/deeply-con...
In a new filing with the SEC, Trump Media and Technology Group, the parent company of Truth Social, revealed that in 2025 it lost $712 million and brought in just $3.7 million in revenue.
27.02.2026 22:22 β π 494 π 189 π¬ 45 π 20"We did not protect President Trump" -- Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, 1/30/26
25.02.2026 18:42 β π 247 π 57 π¬ 21 π 5
7. For more accountability journalism subscribe to Popular Information.
No corporate overlords. No false equivalencies. No BS.
popular.info/subscribe
6. The Trump administration tries to claim Kushner is just a "volunteer." But that argument does not pass legal muster. I break it down in today's Popular Information.
25.02.2026 15:41 β π 206 π 54 π¬ 9 π 05. This is exactly why it is in the Constitution that you cannot be a US government official and simultaneously be paid by foreign governments.
25.02.2026 15:41 β π 134 π 30 π¬ 4 π 1
4. Kushner's top clients, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, are large oil producers. They work with OPEC to keep oil prices high.
If Iranian oil hit the market, it could drive oil prices lower and hurt their economic prospects.
3. The US wants Iran to agree to restrictions on its nuclear program.
In return, Iran will ask for sanctions relief. The most valuable sanctions relief the US can offer is for Iranian oil.
2. Kushner is being paid tens of millions of dollars annually by foreign governments, including Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
This is a huge problem for these negotiations.
1. Today, Jared Kushner is in Geneva representing the US in high-stakes negotiations with Iran.
It is a last ditch effort to avoid war.
But Kushner has debilitating financial conflicts that makes a deal less likely.
9. For more reporting that ignores the spin and looks at the facts, subscribe to Popular Information.
It's independent journalism that holds power to account.
No paywalls. No BS.
popular.info/subscribe
8. This reporting has created the false impression that the temporary 15% measure is on firmer legal footing than the tariffs that were just struck down by the Supreme Court. In reality, the new tariffs are just as illegal as the ones they replaced.
24.02.2026 13:45 β π 211 π 66 π¬ 5 π 27. Other media outlets suggested that the Trade Act gives Trump broad authority to impose global tariffs of up to 15% for 150 days, without mentioning the limitations.
24.02.2026 13:45 β π 87 π 15 π¬ 2 π 0
6. Since there is no balance-of-payments deficit, Trump has no authority under the law to impose a tariff under the Trade Act.
(The Trade Act of 1974 mentions balance-of-trade but only authorizes tariff *reductions* in response.)
5. Balance-of-payments goes beyond goods and services and covers all the money flows between countries. There are large inflows of foreign capital into U.S. Treasury bonds, stocks, and other financial instruments. That is why, despite a large trade deficit, the balance-of-payments deficit is ZERO.
24.02.2026 13:45 β π 107 π 17 π¬ 1 π 04. Balance-of-trade and balance-of-payments are two distinct concepts. Balance-of-trade looks at the goods and services sold to other countries and subtracts the goods and services imported. Last year the US had a trade deficit of about $900 billion.
24.02.2026 13:45 β π 90 π 13 π¬ 2 π 13. Section 122 of the Trade Act gives the president the authority to temporarily impose tariffs in response to βlarge and serious United States balance-of-payments deficits,β not trade deficits. The United States does not have a balance-of-payments deficit, much less a large and serious one.
24.02.2026 13:45 β π 131 π 27 π¬ 2 π 0
2. Several prominent outlets falsely reported that the Trade Act of 1974 gives Trump the legal authority to impose temporary tariffs of up to 15% in response to *trade deficits*
THIS IS NOT TRUE