Clark Mindock's Avatar

Clark Mindock

@clarkmindock.bsky.social

Climate law & insurance regs reporter. •Insurance writing is here: https://www.insuranceinsiderus.com/clark-mindock •My Substack “Landmark” covers climate law: www.landmark.earth Formerly Reuters, Law360, The Independent, etc.

2,073 Followers  |  278 Following  |  259 Posts  |  Joined: 04.10.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Clark Mindock (@clarkmindock.bsky.social)

Preview
Big Oil Is Urging Trump to Stop Battle on Offshore Wind The president’s assault on wind farms is stalling a legislative push to speed permitting for energy projects.

“Oil lobbyists have made the case to Trump officials in recent weeks that his attacks on wind farms off the U.S. coast risk derailing congressional efforts to speed up permits for energy projects, according to people familiar with the matter.” www.wsj.com/politics/pol...

03.03.2026 23:00 — 👍 77    🔁 41    💬 2    📌 0
Preview
The Shadow Campaign Behind The Iran Strike As U.S. forces attack Iran, a dark-money network of anti-Muslim billionaires, fossil fuel empires, and arms dealers is suddenly far closer to its goal.

As U.S. forces attack Iran, a dark-money network of anti-Muslim billionaires, fossil fuel empires, and arms dealers is suddenly far closer to its goal.
www.levernews.com/the-shadow-c...

01.03.2026 15:18 — 👍 6    🔁 3    💬 0    📌 0

The first deaths announced from the US-Israeli strikes on Iran: dozens of school girls. They hit an elementary school in Hormozgan.

28.02.2026 11:35 — 👍 3766    🔁 1618    💬 63    📌 169
Post image

Hey why did the costco ceo actually reply to my email

24.02.2026 16:24 — 👍 7025    🔁 920    💬 153    📌 138
Preview
Quick Brief: Supreme Court takes up a big climate change question The court took up a familiar question. Will it decide the issue once and for all?

The Supreme Court yesterday agreed to consider an important appeal that could determine whether dozens of state & municipal climate lawsuits against Big Oil can stay viable.

It raises some important questions: www.landmark.earth/p/supreme-co...

24.02.2026 12:56 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Update: Young people represented by @youthvgov.bsky.social have also filed a petition challenging the rule.

They kids — who successfully sued Montana over its rules enabling climate change, and settled with Hawaii later — claim the rule violates the U.S. Constitution.

18.02.2026 14:24 — 👍 2    🔁 6    💬 0    📌 0

Update: Young people represented by @youthvgov.bsky.social have also filed a petition challenging the rule.

They kids — who successfully sued Montana over its rules enabling climate change, and settled with Hawaii later — claim the rule violates the U.S. Constitution.

18.02.2026 14:24 — 👍 2    🔁 6    💬 0    📌 0

BREAKING: A coalition of over a dozen environmental groups sued the Trump EPA this morning, challenging the recent repeal of the endangerment finding.

“The EPA’s rollbacks are based on political poppycock, not science or law, and the courts should see it that way."

18.02.2026 12:54 — 👍 14    🔁 6    💬 1    📌 1
Preview
BREAKING: Enviros sue Trump EPA over endangerment finding repeal The Clean Air Act rule has been used to limit greenhouse gas emissions from cars and power plants.

Read more here: www.landmark.earth/p/breaking-e...

18.02.2026 12:54 — 👍 1    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

“The executive branch cannot re-write Congress’s work or overrule the Supreme Court because it would prefer to prioritize its own policy preferences over the law,” the group said.

18.02.2026 12:54 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The group, led by Massachusetts, said last year that the CAA “clearly directs that greenhouse gases are pollutants” under the law, adding that the Supreme Court “unequivocally held that greenhouse gases are air pollutants subject to” the 2007 case Massachusetts v. EPA.

18.02.2026 12:54 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The Trump administration announced it was repealing the rule — which forms the legal basis for virtually all major climate rules in the U.S. — last week.

The lawsuit filed in the D.C. Circuit is likely to be joined soon by another by a group of Democratic attorneys general.

18.02.2026 12:54 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

BREAKING: A coalition of over a dozen environmental groups sued the Trump EPA this morning, challenging the recent repeal of the endangerment finding.

“The EPA’s rollbacks are based on political poppycock, not science or law, and the courts should see it that way."

18.02.2026 12:54 — 👍 14    🔁 6    💬 1    📌 1
Preview
Trump’s EPA set to finalize repeal of the endangerment finding. A bitter legal fight is coming. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has called it the “largest deregulatory action” in U.S. history.

New just now: The EPA will formally revoke the 2009 endangerment finding, a foundational rule for climate change regulations.

Expect a big courthouse fight.

www.landmark.earth/p/trump-epa-...

12.02.2026 12:56 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 1

UPDATE: Shortly after Trump and Zeldin announced the repeal of the endangerment finding, Massachusetts replied.

“I’ll see you in court,” @massago.bsky.social said.

12.02.2026 20:22 — 👍 5    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0

UPDATE: Shortly after Trump and Zeldin announced the repeal of the endangerment finding, Massachusetts replied.

“I’ll see you in court,” @massago.bsky.social said.

12.02.2026 20:22 — 👍 5    🔁 4    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Trump’s EPA set to finalize repeal of the endangerment finding. A bitter legal fight is coming. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin has called it the “largest deregulatory action” in U.S. history.

New just now: The EPA will formally revoke the 2009 endangerment finding, a foundational rule for climate change regulations.

Expect a big courthouse fight.

www.landmark.earth/p/trump-epa-...

12.02.2026 12:56 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 1

I’d heard Florida might be a dark horse wildfire risk state.

Didn’t think it’d show up so bright in a map like this, though. Wow

11.02.2026 13:44 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Ah. Ty!

06.02.2026 15:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I’m not online enough but did google. Which ad? The claude thing?

06.02.2026 03:52 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

NEWS: Offshore wind developers have scored a clean sweep in early legal challenges to the Trump administration’s attempt to halt their projects.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 7    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

But for real, if “no politics” from Bad Bunny and Green Day is the goal then I really don’t think Goodell’s team did a very good job during vetting

03.02.2026 12:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I mean… maybe not in english?

03.02.2026 12:10 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
STATE OF NEW YORK v. BURGUM, 1:26-cv-00072 - CourtListener.com Docket for STATE OF NEW YORK v. BURGUM, 1:26-cv-00072 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

DOCKET: www.courtlistener.com/docket/72126...

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Despite that emergency, the federal government has routinely erected obstacles making it difficult for renewable energy sources like wind and solar to be developed.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The attack on offshore wind comes as President Donald Trump has signed executive orders declaring a national “energy emergency,” and has urged fedreal agencies to work quickly to approve permits for energy products.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The ruling is the fifth time that a judge has ruled that a a partially-finished offshore wind farm can proceed following the Trump administration’s Dec. 22 order.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

New York had argued in its complaint that the stop-work order put state plans for the buildout of renewables in jeopardy, and noted that national security concerns around radar interference from the farms were accounted for during permitting.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Sunrise Wind, which is being developed by Danish developer Ørsted, and the state of New York had filed seperate challenges calling the stop-work order aribtrary and capricous, and their cases were eventually consolidated.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The decision is the fifth loss in a row for the Trump administration, which had ordered five offshore wind projects to stop construction in December due to alleged national security concerns.

02.02.2026 21:16 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0