Model*
02.07.2025 00:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0@barrybaker.bsky.social
Research Scientist at NOAA, dad to a kick ass kid, husband and beer enthusiasts. Posts are my own.
Model*
02.07.2025 00:47 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0ARL is also planned to get chopped. They develop the module used for nuclear dispersion, volcanoes, chemical spills and the like.
02.07.2025 00:46 β π 2 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Is this the IMPROVE network? I really hope not
06.05.2025 01:19 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Itβs critical imo that we reach people as quickly and effectively as possible, especially in hazardous conditions.
03.04.2025 09:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0BTW by improve I mean drive better interfaces and service mainly driven FROM the private sector. Still I believe itβs NOAAs mission to provide its services where the public can get it to protect life and property. In this day and age the average citizen looks at their phone.
03.04.2025 09:34 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0Iβve asked this same question to the WPO and basically was fed something like βWe donβt do this so that private companies can do it.β Counter intuitive imho. Would be good to provide it officially and it doesnβt by any means prevent the private sector from doing so. In fact it would probably improve
03.04.2025 05:00 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0The others are all eulerian based and part of NOAAs Unified Forecast System www.epic.noaa.gov/get-code/ufs....
20.03.2025 01:08 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0A few colleagues wrote that one. Way overlooked on the amount of damage these events can bring.
20.03.2025 01:06 β π 7 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0The story by Virginia Gewin @virginiagewin.bsky.social for EOS @eos.org about our study showing the eye-popping cost of over $150 billion per year for the effects of wind erosion and windborne dust is now online.
eos.org/articles/wil...
Currently there are three different models, UFS AQM (regional full air quality model), GEFS-Aerosol (global aerosol model), and HYSPLIT are all operational. UFS AQM and GEFS both use the FENGSHA dust model developed by yours truly. RRFS-SD, soon to be implemented, will also include FENGSHA at 3km!!
20.03.2025 01:02 β π 10 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0Our inter-journal special issue on Biomass burning uncertainties: emissions, chemistry, and physics is now open for paper submissions at agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/hub/journal/...! Please consider this special-issue when submitting any biomass burning research to @agu.org journals (see thread).
15.03.2025 10:34 β π 10 π 7 π¬ 1 π 0Americans might want to move from anywhere that experience extreme weather and ocean conditions. Not having accurate forecasts will kill lots of people.
09.03.2025 03:52 β π 285 π 75 π¬ 10 π 4Here's a piece in Forbes by @drshepherd2013.bsky.social about our recent study on the economic impact to the USA of dust storms and wind erosion.
www.forbes.com/sites/marsha...
This is a terrible casualty of these policies (one of many)
12.02.2025 12:57 β π 3 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0"[The removal of public data has] real world consequences, leaving individuals, families, communities, and policymakers alike without access to secure, reliable federal data that they have paid for and expect to use."
11.02.2025 21:27 β π 103 π 36 π¬ 4 π 1Me too!
06.02.2025 12:15 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0I have a poster on Tuesday and Wednesday and a talk at the NOAA booth on Wednesday afternoon.
04.12.2024 13:58 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Still further than me
04.12.2024 11:30 β π 1 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0