@vickikndy.bsky.social
And all his crap is made in China!!!
24.05.2025 03:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
I'm attending No Kings's event, “BREVARD NO KINGS DAY RALLY - Cocoa” - sign up now to join me! www.mobilize.us/indivisible/...
24.05.2025 03:56 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I care!
17.03.2025 04:06 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0What are you doing to fight back?!Check out these apps:“5 calls”lists&describes important current issues,who to voice your concerns to along with links to phone numbers and even a script! Easy peesy.“Goods” tells you who brands support and who politicians get funding from. LMK what u have found!
20.02.2025 00:56 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I’m so tired of yelling, “I JUST CAN’T BELIEVE THIS!!!
18.02.2025 05:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0So happy for you 🥰
18.02.2025 05:27 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0I don’t blame them
16.02.2025 04:44 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
👀
“I understand my duty as a prosecutor to mean enforcing the law impartially, and that includes prosecuting a validly returned indictment regardless whether its dismissal would be politically advantageous, to the defendant or to those who appointed me.” - Former Acting USA, SDNY Danielle Sassoon.
Same!
03.02.2025 04:57 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Dude. I'm Pissed.
youtube.com/shorts/zBYoY...
I can’t believe Snoop Dogg kissed the ring! SERIOUSLY?!My list of boycotts is huge.
19.01.2025 13:30 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0It gives me some hope when I see others make a stand
15.01.2025 03:07 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Thank you to Canada 🇨🇦 and Mexico 🇲🇽 for sending firefighters to come help our country in a time of need. Please know that the vast majority of good Americans are simply mortified and embarrassed by our wanna be dictator and his ignorant rhetoric.
12.01.2025 23:04 — 👍 614 🔁 82 💬 12 📌 6
That Felony Guy makes zero sense and is only going to get worse.
12.01.2025 20:48 — 👍 20640 🔁 4200 💬 3031 📌 755
13.01.2025 00:36 — 👍 10408 🔁 1845 💬 158 📌 50
“On January 20, 2025, the next leader of the United States—and of the free world—assumes power,” Blitt said. “Also on that day: Donald Trump is sworn in.”
Cartoonist Bill Blitt
Hey everyone! The discussion I had with Officers Fanone and Dunn about their thoughts and feelings on the fourth anniversary of Jan 6 attack was so important, that I lifted the paywall. Please take a look, it’s very powerful
adamkinzinger.substack.com/p/special-ja...
@danboriscreates.bsky.social *in solidarity with Ann Telneas
05.01.2025 19:10 — 👍 13 🔁 5 💬 1 📌 0
After Ann Telneas’ Spiked Act for the Washington Post -other cartoonists
06.01.2025 19:56 — 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0
Political cartoon depicting a heroic-scaled statue of Ann Telnaes’ caricature of 💩45/47 seen from the left side. Behind the statue, from a ladder, Blitt’s caricature of Jeff Bezos strains to kiss the statue’s butt. The cartoon’s panel is rotated slightly counterclockwise from square. A legend under the cartoon reads “(After Ann Telneas)”
🇺🇸 Brown Origin
“Tomorrow is the 10th anniversary of the Charlie Hebdo murders. I’ll post my visual essay on the state of editorial cartooning today so please check back. I’ve also offered cartoonists rights organizations the free use of this piece so if any […]
[Original post on mstdn.io]
🚨🚨🚨🚨HOMEWORK🚨🚨🚨🚨
I think the Jack Smith draft report is finished. Write to Merrick Garland and ask him to release the Jack Smith report. You can do it here. Select “Messages to the Attorney General” from the drop down menu www.justice.gov/doj/webform/...
![Answer
Under the new algorithm, posts by [redacted] could be considered too
negative might include those that express strong dissent against established narratives or institutions, or those that portray a very bleak or cynical view of societal or political outcomes. Here are some examples based on posts found on X:
• Posts that directly attack or insult powerful figures or institutions could be seen as too negative, especially if they suggest systemic manipulation or deceit. This includes posts that question official narratives or imply widespread misinformation by political influencers.
• Comments on the manipulation of public sentiment or the encouragement of negative social behaviors, like casual sadism or misinformation, would likely be viewed negatively under an algorithm designed to reduce the spread of content that could be seen as objectionable or divisive.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:gvda6fem6r7selm4gzjjww4a/bafkreiapqtacqylbomifj7xltpfszng5mgohvobnovdjrutbytm5d655aq@jpeg)
Answer Under the new algorithm, posts by [redacted] could be considered too negative might include those that express strong dissent against established narratives or institutions, or those that portray a very bleak or cynical view of societal or political outcomes. Here are some examples based on posts found on X: • Posts that directly attack or insult powerful figures or institutions could be seen as too negative, especially if they suggest systemic manipulation or deceit. This includes posts that question official narratives or imply widespread misinformation by political influencers. • Comments on the manipulation of public sentiment or the encouragement of negative social behaviors, like casual sadism or misinformation, would likely be viewed negatively under an algorithm designed to reduce the spread of content that could be seen as objectionable or divisive.
• Posts that highlight a perceived collapse or failure of systems, particularly those that use sarcasm or humor to critique the current state of affairs, might be flagged for promoting a negative outlook. • Any content suggesting that the public is being systematically misled or conditioned in a certain way, especially if it involves political outcomes or public health crises, could be deemed too negative. These types of posts might be deboosted or have their visibility reduced as they could be seen as promoting negativity, misinformation, or discord, which are often targeted by algorithms aiming to maintain a more positive or balanced user experience.
![If X wants to limit reach for [redacted] negative posts, what are the top 5 examples of posts of hers that X considers negative?
Answer
X might consider limiting the reach of C posts based on the following examples, which could be perceived as negative or controversial:
1. Criticism of Government Actions: A post where she describes actions by the US and UK governments as
"unforgivable malfeasance" could be seen as highly critical and potentially inflammatory. This kind of statement might be flagged for its political nature and could be interpreted as negative by X's algorithms or moderation policies.
2. Commentary on Social Media Misinformation: Her post about people who downplayed the USS Liberty story while pushing another narrative suggests a critique of selective information dissemination. This could be viewed as negative if it's seen as promoting conspiracy theories or misinformation.
Accusations Against Public Figures: Mentioning Joel Kaplan's collaboration with the Israeli government to restrict criticism on social media platforms might be viewed negatively due to its accusatory tone towards individuals or entities. Such posts can be controversial and might trigger moderation for potentially spreading unverified claims.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:gvda6fem6r7selm4gzjjww4a/bafkreictojvsrghhm3cju3cp5cbvxxd2uf4fqdayafta2xaflshdec5xnu@jpeg)
If X wants to limit reach for [redacted] negative posts, what are the top 5 examples of posts of hers that X considers negative? Answer X might consider limiting the reach of C posts based on the following examples, which could be perceived as negative or controversial: 1. Criticism of Government Actions: A post where she describes actions by the US and UK governments as "unforgivable malfeasance" could be seen as highly critical and potentially inflammatory. This kind of statement might be flagged for its political nature and could be interpreted as negative by X's algorithms or moderation policies. 2. Commentary on Social Media Misinformation: Her post about people who downplayed the USS Liberty story while pushing another narrative suggests a critique of selective information dissemination. This could be viewed as negative if it's seen as promoting conspiracy theories or misinformation. Accusations Against Public Figures: Mentioning Joel Kaplan's collaboration with the Israeli government to restrict criticism on social media platforms might be viewed negatively due to its accusatory tone towards individuals or entities. Such posts can be controversial and might trigger moderation for potentially spreading unverified claims.
4. Disparaging Comments in Replies: In her responses, particularly one where she tells someone to "fuck off" and dismisses their content as "dumbass hostage flyers," this kind of vulgar and confrontational language could be flagged for violating community guidelines on civility and respect. 5. Skepticism and Derision Towards Media or Events: Posts where she expresses extreme skepticism or mocks the authenticity of certain events or communications, like her comment on the difference in writing styles of letters in a case, might be considered negative due to the tone of disbelief and derision. These posts could be considered for reach limitation by X due to their potential to engage users in a negative or controversial manner, possibly attracting more negative feedback or violating platform policies on misinformation, personal attacks, or civility. However, the actual decision by X would depend on their specific content moderation policies and algorithms regarding negative content.
⚠️ In response to Musk changing the X algorithm to deboost negative content, people asked Grok what is considered “negative” and were told:
• Criticism of the government
• Commentary about misinformation
• Suggestion the public is being manipulated
• Attacks against powerful people or institutions
Jeff Bezos never wanted this cartoon to become public.
He killed it, and as a result, pulitzer prize editorial cartoonist Ann Telnaes quit.
Make sure everyone sees this cartoon.
I can’t believe we have titans of industry slipping million dollar bills into Trump’s inaugural g-string like it’s some bachelor party for the end of democracy.
04.01.2025 02:41 — 👍 3606 🔁 941 💬 92 📌 49
