Nathan Richardson's Avatar

Nathan Richardson

@nathanrichardson.bsky.social

Law prof @JacksonvilleU. Climate, air pollution, energy, & institutions. Dad. Formerly @UofSC Law, @RFF. Believe in a better South. Build houses.

3,523 Followers  |  1,760 Following  |  2,125 Posts  |  Joined: 23.07.2023
Posts Following

Posts by Nathan Richardson (@nathanrichardson.bsky.social)

Ah, I didn't even know about the City Canal, other than vague knowledge that the entire SW/Tidal Basin area was low-lying wetland. On the other hand the image has some elevation to it (notably the bridge) that doesn't really fit topographically. I really don't know!

01.03.2026 20:00 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This is clearly one of the alternate realities from "Beavis and Butthead Do the Universe"

01.03.2026 19:56 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

If it is on the C&O (as inclusion in the Federal Triangle pamphlet suggests), then my best guess is at the Tidewater Lock end where the Watergate is now. That area has changed radically.

01.03.2026 19:54 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Alexandria Canal (Virginia) - Wikipedia

I bet this is not the C&O Canal but the (long since filled in) Alexandria Canal on the other side of the river. It doesn't look like any spot on the C&O I can imagine. If it is then fill has radically changed the area now.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexand...

01.03.2026 19:49 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

In other words the post is a weird kind of dormant judicial supremacy.

01.03.2026 18:54 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The part I don't like is the elision from "no court will enforce this law" (correct) to "law is irrelevant" (incorrect). If 51 senators or 51 million people think presidents shouldn't have the power to make war, it is not illegitimate (much less irrelevant) to frame that argument in legal terms.

01.03.2026 18:53 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

I understood the piece in purely descriptive terms, as if to throw his hands up at the whole thing, rather than an assertion that pure presidentialism is good or inevitable. Though even if that understanding is correct then the shot at Congress at the end is something different.

01.03.2026 18:46 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

This draft Trump EO on voting is even nuttier than you imagined. Zeroing out all voter rolls and making everyone re-register in person. Mandatory annual online re-registration. Requiring anyone casting an absentee ballot to find a notary. No dropboxes. All post-election disputes federalized. 😟

27.02.2026 21:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1192    πŸ” 701    πŸ’¬ 81    πŸ“Œ 100

Discovering departmentalism in the dumbest way possible

28.02.2026 05:24 β€” πŸ‘ 10    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

I like hazys and I think it's way too much

27.02.2026 18:03 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Surely an insult later co-opted as a badge of honor by a little known separatist movement in Picardie.

27.02.2026 16:36 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Seedlings of hope sprout for Ocklawaha River restoration | Opinion A local environmental advocate reports progress as Florida lawmakers push to restore the Ocklawaha River by breaching the Rodman Dam.

Retired U.S. Navy rear admiral and outdoor enthusiast William McQuilkin wrote an op-ed for the Florida Times Union after his time on the Ocklawaha River during the drawdown: www.jacksonville.com/story/opinio...

27.02.2026 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Deponent GOAT

27.02.2026 16:31 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a basketball hoop in a hallway with the play button on the bottom right ALT: a basketball hoop in a hallway with the play button on the bottom right
27.02.2026 15:58 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Madison: "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition"

27.02.2026 15:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Madison: "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition"

27.02.2026 15:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Two amicus briefs I enjoyed reading in support of birthright citizenship at the Supreme Court:

@kewhittington.bsky.social’s: www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

@evanbernick.bsky.social and @jedshug.bsky.social’s: www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

I highly recommend them if y’all have time.

27.02.2026 13:07 β€” πŸ‘ 88    πŸ” 31    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1
Post image

The unitary executive strikes again.

27.02.2026 05:47 β€” πŸ‘ 25    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Starting to think the future is less super-MQD and more that the doctrine gets subsumed into general textualism, becoming at most yet another canon. Doesn't mean it's not arbitrary or dangerous, they all are when abused. But it's not operating outside of textualism. I think this is ACB's view?

27.02.2026 00:07 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The Conference of Catholic Bishops is... not playing around in this brief.

www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/25...

26.02.2026 20:54 β€” πŸ‘ 3267    πŸ” 1098    πŸ’¬ 117    πŸ“Œ 138
Post image

never forget what they took from us

26.02.2026 16:18 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

The long 2010s are finally over

26.02.2026 13:15 β€” πŸ‘ 6006    πŸ” 841    πŸ’¬ 78    πŸ“Œ 94

This sounds good, but doesn't it just open the market for Kalshi/Polymarket prop bets that the state can't regulate because they're federally-regulated CFTC derivatives?

26.02.2026 02:50 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

To the tune of Funkytown

26.02.2026 00:05 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

This works best if read in engaged Anakin voice

25.02.2026 23:04 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

"popular knapsack with many different locations" energy

25.02.2026 23:01 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a basketball player wearing a lakers jersey throws the ball ALT: a basketball player wearing a lakers jersey throws the ball

I know it's not JR but this is the NBA equivalent of a 47 page solo dissent:

25.02.2026 03:49 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

He's like Albert Belle or Theo Fleury or JR Smith. Only room for one of them on the team, for sure, but they do add value.

25.02.2026 02:11 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
24.02.2026 19:52 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

I believe there should be a severe reputational cost for giving *this* man their seat. And I believe judges should know that when deciding.

That’s not a thing I believe in normal times, but I do now.

24.02.2026 18:50 β€” πŸ‘ 253    πŸ” 46    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 1