Peter Miller's Avatar

Peter Miller

@drpeterjmiller.bsky.social

I’m an academic labour activist, professor, Classical philologist, and sports historian living and working in Winnipeg.

1,184 Followers  |  1,939 Following  |  299 Posts  |  Joined: 18.04.2024
Posts Following

Posts by Peter Miller (@drpeterjmiller.bsky.social)

My son @drpeterjmiller.bsky.social coined the phrase " "Glassphemy" for when one doesn't use the appropriate glass

13.02.2026 20:23 — 👍 3    🔁 1    💬 1    📌 0

Working on getting the Oxford English Dictionary to accept it :)

17.02.2026 16:14 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Amazing. Just ordered this and then saw all the other great prints on @aplante.com!

04.12.2025 15:38 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Palestine Uprooted: Nakba Past and Present For the past ten years, the Palestinian Canadian Congress has worked to bring a national Nakba exhibit to life. With the support and expertise of the Palestinian Content Advisory Network, this vision ...

I just wrote a letter: Palestine Uprooted: Nakba Past and Present. Write one here: actionnetwork.org/letters/pale...

20.11.2025 00:07 — 👍 4    🔁 2    💬 0    📌 0

But we already knew about the room they put you in at a doctor’s office after they call you from the waiting room.

17.11.2025 23:57 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Video thumbnail

NEW: Epstein survivors release the most powerful PSA I have ever seen.

Make this go viral so every member of the House of Representatives sees it.

16.11.2025 23:43 — 👍 59628    🔁 36462    💬 1307    📌 2908

Your bar is a thing of beauty!

16.11.2025 16:36 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

Reposted every year in response to all those who fetishize remembrance

09.11.2025 11:42 — 👍 323    🔁 96    💬 13    📌 4

Why is a tax incentive for private-sector R&D considered an “investment,” but public R&D spending (through government, universities, or other public institutions) not? And why is spending on education, and other forms of “human capital”, not considered an investment?

06.11.2025 00:25 — 👍 4    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
Opinion: How much are MPs entitled to know about research grants? Not as much as they think A parliamentary committee is asking for academics’ private information on a strange anti-DEI crusade

How much are MPs entitled to know about research grants? Not as much as they think. A parliamentary committee is asking for researchers' personal information in what seems like an anti-DEI crusade, by @picardonhealth.bsky.social www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti... via @theglobeandmail.com

04.11.2025 12:19 — 👍 95    🔁 65    💬 3    📌 21

Awesome. Was sorry to miss it

02.11.2025 19:13 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Yamamoto is a robot come from the future to destroy our hopes.

02.11.2025 04:39 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Write to our MPs? This is awful. I hope CAUT will also have a response.

31.10.2025 16:39 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Maxime Blanchette-Joncas:
  I'm tabling the following motion:
That the committee request the three funding councils, namely the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), as part of the study on the impact of federal funding allocation criteria on research excellence in Canada, to provide it with the disaggregated data of all submitted applications, whether funded or not, for all student and faculty funding programs from the master's level onwards for applications made between 2020 and 2025. That this data include (1) demographic data of applicants and collaborators, including applicants' responses to the equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) questionnaire, (2) the institutions and departments of applicants, including the institutions of collaboration, (3) the language of the application, (4) all data regarding the type of application and project content (application year, grant program, discipline, title, summary, amount requested by the applicant), as well as (5) the identity of the evaluation committee, comments, opinions, scores assigned to applications for each criterion, and (6) the outcome of the application and the amount awarded. That the three funding councils submit all this data to the committee within 15 days following the adoption of this motion, in an Excel spreadsheet format.

Maxime Blanchette-Joncas: I'm tabling the following motion: That the committee request the three funding councils, namely the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), as part of the study on the impact of federal funding allocation criteria on research excellence in Canada, to provide it with the disaggregated data of all submitted applications, whether funded or not, for all student and faculty funding programs from the master's level onwards for applications made between 2020 and 2025. That this data include (1) demographic data of applicants and collaborators, including applicants' responses to the equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) questionnaire, (2) the institutions and departments of applicants, including the institutions of collaboration, (3) the language of the application, (4) all data regarding the type of application and project content (application year, grant program, discipline, title, summary, amount requested by the applicant), as well as (5) the identity of the evaluation committee, comments, opinions, scores assigned to applications for each criterion, and (6) the outcome of the application and the amount awarded. That the three funding councils submit all this data to the committee within 15 days following the adoption of this motion, in an Excel spreadsheet format.

The Canadian Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Research is launching a US-style attack on EDI in Tri-Council funding.

As part of this attack, they are demanding disclosure of confidential demographic info + reviewer comments of all Canadian researchers who have applied b/w 2000-2025.

31.10.2025 14:33 — 👍 164    🔁 115    💬 18    📌 37

Canadian researchers should be aware the there is a motion before the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science and Research to force Tricouncils to hand over disaggregated peer review data on all applications:
Applicant names, profiles, demographics
Reviewers names, profiles, comments, and scores

30.10.2025 20:33 — 👍 144    🔁 170    💬 13    📌 50

Absolutely disgusting

29.10.2025 02:26 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I believe they noted a “hitch in his giddy up” 😅

29.10.2025 02:25 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Mine is ok. Fingers crossed

29.10.2025 02:15 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Harry and Meaghan cheering for the Dodgers?? The French were right about one thing for sure…

29.10.2025 01:33 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

Just got home from the @uwfa.bsky.social screening of The Encampments. What a harrowing, inspiring, and vital documentary.

22.10.2025 02:18 — 👍 5    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0
Vintage black and white photo of a young girl with large eyes and curly hair, wearing a patterned bib over a dark shirt.

Vintage black and white photo of a young girl with large eyes and curly hair, wearing a patterned bib over a dark shirt.

14 October 1940 | A Dutch Jewish girl, Mirjam Lewkowicz, was born in Gouda.

In September 1943, she was deported to #Auschwitz and murdered in a gas chamber after the selection.
---

A short video showing the ruins of gas chamber and crematorium III: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ipQmBPAlJQ8

14.10.2025 20:00 — 👍 553    🔁 154    💬 16    📌 14

Israel is awful: “Israel also forbade people from celebrating the release on Monday, firing teargas at family members and journalists waiting near Ofer prison in the occupied West Bank, where detainees were kept.”

14.10.2025 01:31 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

He can just focus on his inner lobster, and he’ll be fine.

10.10.2025 00:11 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I’ve been ordering from Home Hardware. Did you know they’re Canadian owned? I’ll get to the store in my Mazda.

08.10.2025 02:05 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Yikes: “appeal against school and daycare” in your neighborhood is bad even in the bad context of nimbyism.

02.10.2025 23:52 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

The reading study it mentions concludes “Reading with a human partner elicited longer, more lexically diverse, and more relevant responses from children.” Yes!!!

02.10.2025 23:48 — 👍 34    🔁 2    💬 1    📌 0

It was a depressing story to read!

02.10.2025 23:45 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Video thumbnail

We are thrilled to announce that our NEW Large Language Model will be released on 11.18.25.

01.10.2025 14:38 — 👍 25116    🔁 8338    💬 660    📌 2205
Preview
Court Rules in AAUP v Rubio: Trump Admin Violated First Amendment The AAUP and partners sued to block the Trump administration from carrying out large-scale arrests, detentions, and deportations of noncitizen students and faculty members for ideological reasons.

Once again, it is *faculty*—not administrators—who brought this case and won. Including UC Faculty Association chapters of the AAUP.

01.10.2025 01:18 — 👍 874    🔁 271    💬 4    📌 12
Post image


"Residential school denialism is not simply an alternate perspective. It is a form of harm that retraumatizes Survivors, undermines truth and perpetuates colonial ideas that jeopardize Canada’s ability to work with Indigenous Peoples..." –
@seancarleton.bsky.social @truthinthesoil.bsky.social

30.09.2025 14:41 — 👍 18    🔁 13    💬 1    📌 0