๐ฆ
03.11.2025 22:41 โ ๐ 214 ๐ 80 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0@nikitahtik.bsky.social
๐ฑ local demi sphinx cat (they/them) and liker of boys๐ณ๏ธโ๐ ๐ big time clothing nerd and certified seas appreciator โ PP by Enchik_ofigenchik on TG ! Boyf @floofmoons.bsky.social check him out or consequences ! Likes and follows may be NSFW, minors begone !
๐ฆ
03.11.2025 22:41 โ ๐ 214 ๐ 80 ๐ฌ 3 ๐ 0Will start posting pictures I took during #Anthropomme 2025 here & ping relevant people !!
Floof stack ๐ฅน
from left to right :
@yuniko.bsky.social
@riktus.bsky.social
@violetcross18.bsky.social
@kiirono-amarali.bsky.social
@vibrystheotter.bsky.social
Micro-photoshoot during #Anthropomme 2025 for @yuniko.bsky.social !! Quite happy with how these turned out, I think the yellow background worked super well for these !!
#furry #fursuit
Reposted with alt-text.
26.10.2025 15:13 โ ๐ 70 ๐ 31 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 1Good sir @vibrystheotter.bsky.social, micro-photoshoot during #Anthropomme 2025, again my hand was a little rusty with the editing software but I gave it my best !
21.10.2025 23:12 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 1 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Musica leggerissima my absolute beloved UGH such a good song thank you Colapesce for that one
21.10.2025 22:58 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0Merci ร tous pour ce week-end ! ๐
C'รฉtait une premiรจre pour nous que d'organiser un village fur, on espรจre que รงa vous a plu, et on compte bien rรฉitรฉrer l'expรฉrience l'an prochain ! ๐ฅ
An anthropomorphic feathered creature with bunny are looking at some weird bug (hornet) in autumn forest
I'm so proud of thisss
For my friend @lumarion.bsky.social ๐ฆ
Happy spooky month! Oh, I love autumn so much.
#art #furryart #silksong kinda #illustration #furry #commsopen btw
Just pirate it
evergreen
29.04.2025 06:37 โ ๐ 4068 ๐ 2156 ๐ฌ 32 ๐ 48Merci ร tous pour votre prรฉsence au Furbar de ce Septembre et pour les casse-cous du trampo, reposez-vous bien, vous l'avez mรฉritรฉ !
On vous donne rendez-vous le 18 octobre pour la prochaine รฉdition du Furbar ๐๐
#Furry #Furbar
Much needed sometimes (often)
take care man
I personally just use plain pen & paper for stuff like this ๐ซข
21.09.2025 20:37 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0idk
10.09.2025 07:48 โ ๐ 5542 ๐ 1630 ๐ฌ 21 ๐ 6ะะธะทะดะตั ะฝะฐ ัะฐะฑะพัะต. ะะธะทะดะตั ะฝะฐ ัััะฑะต. ะะธะทะดะตั ะฒ ะถะธะทะฝะธ. ะัััะฐั ัะตะฑั ะบะฐะบ ััะฐ ัะพะฑะฐะบะฐ.
09.09.2025 18:29 โ ๐ 54 ๐ 3 ๐ฌ 4 ๐ 0break free. #signalis
11.08.2025 16:06 โ ๐ 2111 ๐ 671 ๐ฌ 12 ๐ 2!! WHAT HAPPENED
these used to be level I swear ๐ญ somehow the compression removed orientation metadata
WEIRD and ANNOYING !!!!
just imagine they're upright ok I'm not making another post </3
@adiale.bsky.social micro-photoshoot during #anthropomme 2025 !! Bit rusty with the editing admittedly
10.08.2025 19:35 โ ๐ 2 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Artificer aka red slugcat is lying on the floor of the chamber and keeps stolen Pebbles pearls to herself
Heeey!
I love Arti so much
Obsession is returning
#art #furryart #rainworld #artificer
Bottled up and pushed down
07.08.2025 14:02 โ ๐ 368 ๐ 101 ๐ฌ 1 ๐ 0Commission for @xaxallith.bsky.social โ
#art #digitalart
thank you so much !!!
04.08.2025 17:09 โ ๐ 1 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0see other replies, did that already
04.08.2025 17:06 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0nor did I say the opposite
I'll explain better : statistically significant is when deviation from expected value (here : 50%) is superior than deviation caused by random chance (i.e. there's something more happening)
bigger sample = smaller confidence interval (here, sample very big)
actually I can prove it
I put 50% for the proportion of response because the null hypothesis is that both populations are equal (H_0=mu1-mu2=0)
in this case we'd expect random variations of +/- 0.14% with a certainty of 99.5% (0.5% of false positive), and we observe way more than 0.14% discrepancy
I went in there expecting everyone to know what statistical significance means and I now realize that was silly of me as this is not academia... Whoops !
04.08.2025 16:26 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0I'm not saying the opposite ! There's a misunderstanding there, I was just mentioning that the global "binary" trans population doesn't seem to be evenly split, that's all, it doesn't invalidate anything this study might be saying, just provides more (I think) interesting context :]
04.08.2025 16:18 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0yes of course it is significant ! The sample is absolutely massive, there is a discrepancy bigger than a few tens of percents -- it is statistically significant (understand : "something is happening here that cannot be explained by only random chance")
04.08.2025 16:15 โ ๐ 3 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 2 ๐ 0(Also just to be clear, by "excess" I mean "comparatively bigger amount", no moral judgements here)
04.08.2025 15:45 โ ๐ 0 ๐ 0 ๐ฌ 0 ๐ 0(2/2) Have too and mention it (specifically abt the newer data from the NCVS), but it's the best I found.
I tried looking at the newest available data from the CDC but I'll be real I have no idea how to use it, so I can't verify the data, but that study was quoted 236 times which is a bunch, so...