Lack of reviewers threatens robustness of neuroscience literature
Simple math suggests that small groups of scientists can significantly bias peer review.
Broad peer review is crucial for a healthy scientific literature, but neuroscientists turn down review requests too often. Simple math suggests that small groups of scientists can significantly bias the literature, writes @jvoigts.bsky.social.
#neuroskyence
www.thetransmitter.org/publishing/l...
02.03.2026 15:04 β
π 56
π 23
π¬ 2
π 7
UKRN welcomes new members! Delighted to have Imperial, Queen Mary, Bitesize Bio & FORRT join us.
With 20/24 Russell Group universities now on board, our shared effort to strengthen rigour, transparency & reproducibility keeps growing. Onwards!
25.02.2026 12:02 β
π 4
π 4
π¬ 0
π 0
Iβll try ASAP. I really like the new logo! π€©
24.02.2026 09:24 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Very excited about this new release!
24.02.2026 09:17 β
π 4
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
π£ PsychoPy Studio is out now!!
β¨ Which also means swish new branding on psychopy.org β¨
We really hope that this improves user experience in general.
Please download and try it. Let us know how you get on via the forum discourse.psychopy.org/t/introducin...
23.02.2026 16:30 β
π 19
π 11
π¬ 1
π 4
Here is a list of our lab's recent outputs as either a poster or a talk at recent conferences in Australia (Cognitive Neuroscience, Neuroscience, Philosophy and Psychology). All downloadable / watchable on YouTube.
11.12.2025 03:57 β
π 8
π 2
π¬ 1
π 0
A common error in many scientific interventions is to compare the improvement (or worsening) of a measure with a baseline measure.
But because the baseline data (Time0) is included in the Improvement data (Time1 - Time0), these two variables already share half their variance & are correlated r~-0.7
14.10.2025 07:49 β
π 5
π 1
π¬ 2
π 0
Your example reminds us that science is not only about producing results within institutions, but also about keeping curiosity, honesty, and human dignity alive beyond them
04.10.2025 17:08 β
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
With this, you give credibility and a voice to all the scientists who left academia before they ever had the chance to be successful and who struggle deeply with the very system you describe. It takes real integrity to speak openly about it.
04.10.2025 17:08 β
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Thank you, Mike, for what youβve done for science and especially for how youβre living it now. This shows the true mentality of a scientist, and I truly admire your courage in doing so.
04.10.2025 17:06 β
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Why I left academia and neuroscience
Don't worry, this isn't yet another story of rage-quitting.
Why I left academia and neuroscience.
This post on Substack has gained a lot of traction. I think many people identify with it.
(Most of my posts are technical tutorials on machine-learning and LLM-mechanisms.)
mikexcohen.substack.com/p/why-i-left...
02.10.2025 13:00 β
π 32
π 7
π¬ 4
π 3
Join us for a 2 day bootcamp!
π
Dec 16th/17th
π Nottingham
π©βπ» Day 1 - Create experiments in PsychoPy and optimise for EEG
π§ Day 2 - EEG data collection and ERP analysis strategies
βΉοΈ Info and Ticket purchase shorturl.at/DVL8s
In collaboration with @ant-neuro.com
01.10.2025 13:00 β
π 7
π 6
π¬ 0
π 0