Me, usually: political scientists would make the worst politicians.
Me, right now: political scientists are the only good politicians.
@bhaggart.bsky.social
Professor, Political Science, Brock University Knowledge governance, IPE, Sydney Swans tragic Co-author, with Natasha Tusikov, The New Knowledge: Information, Data and the Remaking of Global Power (Bloomsbury, 2023). Open Access.
Me, usually: political scientists would make the worst politicians.
Me, right now: political scientists are the only good politicians.
βIf we elevate fighter jets as βstrategicβ assets but dismiss a functioning education system as βmere aid,β and if we always find money for missiles but not for water or electricity, we are not protecting our societies. We are weakening themβ
www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/d...?
At number 12: A perfect song from this Melbourne singer-songwriter (2018). A soft and haunting recollection of a young girl's experiences growing up. It hits hard. There's a video of the single edit, but you'll want to hear the 6 minute version.
#best100 #MusicSky
youtu.be/G1egX_w_msM?...
First time MP and former international relations prof @willgreavesmp.bsky.social stands on principle.
As someone posted in the last 48 hours, Carney's Davos speech really does seem to have served as an inkblot test, with people interpreting it in different ways.
#CdnPoli
At number 12: A perfect song from this Melbourne singer-songwriter (2018). A soft and haunting recollection of a young girl's experiences growing up. It hits hard. There's a video of the single edit, but you'll want to hear the 6 minute version.
#best100 #MusicSky
youtu.be/G1egX_w_msM?...
Never been a fan of the way USians sounds or looks. Maybe Statesiders?
02.03.2026 19:09 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 2 π 0
here we go. just for you and @mollyquell.bsky.social
www.luxtimes.lu/luxembourg/l...
So glad sthg like this is finally happening, largely thx to @kristenthomasen.bsky.social. Been ~2.5 years now of layers of disheartenment & sustained moral injury (5 if count covid), and a public discussion focused specifically on Canadian complicity, from a tech /tech law angle, is long overdue.
02.03.2026 15:36 β π 21 π 13 π¬ 1 π 0
As @ldobsonhughes.bsky.social notes, international law isn't a principle to be sacrificed on the altar of hard-headed self-interest: it's a core Canadian national interest, and should be defended as such.
bsky.app/profile/ldob...
Like Carney's Davos speech, it could've served as a global rallying cry (Even Canada is opposed!) and a dagger to the heart of Trump's power. It could've struck a blow for the international law Canada needs to survive as an independent country. Instead Carney chose, again, to go along to get along.
02.03.2026 15:45 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 1 π 0
Canada's fundamental national interest is in a non-authoritarian US, embedded in the international rule of law. Carney's statement served neither goals.
Imagine the signal it would've sent if Carney had displayed even a modicum of courage and wisdom, and called out the illegality of Trump's war.
Mark Carney's embrace of Trump's illegal, falsehood-based war isn't hard-headed realpolitik: it's a direct enabling of a tyrant wannabe who poses an existential threat to Canada.
As Timothy Snyder argues, only by resisting Trump's lies can the US--and Canada, and the world--hope to get through this.
βWe invoke international law and the βrules based international orderβ when adversaries engage in unlawful actions, but abandon those same rules entirely when itβs the Americansβ¦For a country that depends on law more than force for its own security, that is not realism; it is recklessness.β
02.03.2026 11:53 β π 107 π 37 π¬ 0 π 2
βMr. Carney in a Mumbai speech Saturday said Ottawa can work with partners even if it sometimes disagrees with them.β
Or even if that country sometimes murders Canadian citizens, on Canadian soil.
www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/art...
If the rumours are true and the kids and social media consultation opens today, here are two things I think should be banned from
social media:
1) AI bots
2) recommendations algorithms that optimise for time on site
Firm regulation of both of these things is possible and auditable
This is an illegal war breaching international law.
Canadian military cannot be involved in aiding the Trump war.
The Prime Minister must clarify.
www.cbc.ca/news/politic...
Good π§΅ on participation of π¨π¦ forces in attacks on Iran via personnel exchanges w US regional command π
Important questions remain: did Canada tell its soldiers that they could / should decline orders that would violate the UN Charter or that risked violating of International Humanitarian Law?
This is the thing about exchanges--we send our officers to do real work in other countries' armed forces. So, when those countries do stuff, our officers are involved. Tis the price of doing business-- if you want these folks to learn.
BUT national control never goes away. Officers can say no 1/2
A great example of how public relations can course through Canadian journalism. I track the relations and public comms that circulate with architectural renderings and photographsβlike I did with Sidewalk Labs from 2017 to 2020. New tab:
01.03.2026 17:44 β π 12 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0Screenshot add announcing trade diversification to protect Ontario
Screenshot cover Ontario's Building Fortress Am-Can plan
Ontario provincial government's attempt to square the trade policy circle.
01.03.2026 18:27 β π 6 π 3 π¬ 0 π 0
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."
-Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953
I just find it all so tiresome, because LLMs are so horribly suited for what they want them to do. Itβs like if the military designated the Magic 8 Ball a supply chain risk. And the media responded by fawning over Mattelβs brave ethical stand, and wondering what the Origami Fortune Teller would do.
01.03.2026 20:47 β π 52 π 15 π¬ 0 π 0Sigh. Yes. Caviezel was perfectly cast -- they all were (especially Bear) -- which makes his MAGAdom particularly painful.
01.03.2026 16:57 β π 0 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0They don't *need* AI to make these decisions. But they *want* AI to make these decisions. Because the tech gives them plausible deniability--something to blame (other than themselves) when things go wrong.
01.03.2026 15:40 β π 2274 π 724 π¬ 69 π 41
Person of Interest is to the 2010s and 2020s what The X-Files was to the 1990s and 24 to the 2000s. There's no better pop-culture starting point for understanding the fears and dilemmas of our surveillance-based, datafied society.
Person of Interest reboot, please.
1. The goal is to replace scientific, evidence-based knowledge with oracular knowledge, and then to control the oracle.
2. This was the main thematic plot line for Seasons 3-5 of Person of Interest.
"We invoke international law and the 'rules based international order' when adversaries engage in unlawful actions, but abandon those same rules entirely when itβs the Americans doing the bombing."
#Opinion from former foreign minister Lloyd Axworthy
Shouldβve written attack, not invasion. Illegal under international law, either way.
01.03.2026 10:47 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Canada is only one country. It couldnβt have stopped the illegal US and Israeli invasion. But as prime minister, Mark Carney had the obligation to stand up for fundamental Canadian interests in sovereignty and the rule of law. He failed to do so, utterly.
01.03.2026 10:44 β π 16 π 3 π¬ 1 π 0Acting as international law doesnβt exist, as Carney is doing in his refusal to even mention the term, creates a self-fulfilling prophesy. Worse, it creates the might-makes-right world many Canadians thought Carney wanted to prevent. It makes us easy pickings for Trumpβs US.
01.03.2026 10:44 β π 7 π 2 π¬ 1 π 1