BOOM π₯:
Judge Immergut issues a second Temporary Restraining Order prohibiting the relocation, federalization, or deployment of ANY NATIONAL GUARD FROM ANY STATE into the state of Oregon.
@kimba1129.bsky.social
Leaving X. Straight ticket Democrat π Heartbroken over Kamala π We got this!πππππ Trump is a criminal Doing my best in N Michigan living in a sea of red βΉοΈ #Resist πππππ #BlueCrew ππ #BlueStormπππ #FBARMY πβοΈ #TheFlightCrewπβοΈ #StrongerTogether
BOOM π₯:
Judge Immergut issues a second Temporary Restraining Order prohibiting the relocation, federalization, or deployment of ANY NATIONAL GUARD FROM ANY STATE into the state of Oregon.
The dipshit in charge is too busy giving out his βcoinsβ and acting like heβs a celebrity to care.
06.10.2025 03:01 β π 3 π 2 π¬ 1 π 0Thank you, Ms. Bower
06.10.2025 03:16 β π 8 π 1 π¬ 0 π 0[This is a reference to Oregon's request for broad TRO barring deployment of *any* federalized nationalized guard...not just California national guard, which the second TRO was filed in response to)
bsky.app/profile/anna...
Immergut: The question is the scope. I see the defendants' conduct as being in direct contravention of the court's order issued yesterday....I am troubled by the defendant's conduct, but have some concern about the breadth of the alternative relief requested during tonight's hearing
06.10.2025 03:14 β π 763 π 121 π¬ 19 π 11@annabower.bsky.social
She is on call
Awesome
06.10.2025 03:13 β π 6 π 0 π¬ 0 π 0Immergut: I'm handling this on expedited basis, but defendants haven't provided new info.
SHE RULES FROM THE BENCH: I grant the plaintiffs motion for a second TRO based on reasons stated in previous order...
Kennedy adds that state and local law enforcement in the state of Oregon and in the City of Portland will need to expend additional resources in response to any increased protest activity.
Immergut asks if they have anything further. Plaintiffs say no.
Kennedy is back to address harm for Oregon.
He says that Oregon has sovereign interest in what the needs of the state are. People of Oregon have that interest, including whether their own forces can handle law enforcement issues...
Riley: True that soldiers would still be federalized even if still in CA the state. But at least they'd be geographically located in the state...if they're out of state, logistical issue getting them back and under state control if there's an emergency.
06.10.2025 03:09 β π 466 π 40 π¬ 4 π 1Immergut: What's the irreparable harm for CA?
Riley: First is injury to our sovereign rights and police powers. California soldiers are being unwilling participants in a unlawful federal mission....
Riley: We don't think this would create jurisdictional conflict....Court has jurisdiction to enter new injunction
06.10.2025 03:07 β π 376 π 21 π¬ 3 π 0Immergut has questions about California component.
Mentions that original TRO re: Oregon national guard appealed to 9th Circuit. What's the consequence if I grant this TRO, she asks.
Kennedy says he'll want Jane Riley to address for California.
Kennedy: We filed TRO based on California deployment here, then after that we received notice of the Hegseth memo re: Texas deployment. So now in position to need to broaden the relief to include deployment of national guard of an state and District of Columbia....
06.10.2025 03:03 β π 556 π 43 π¬ 9 π 4I Bet You Didnβt Know This? ππΌππ½ππΎ
06.10.2025 02:23 β π 180 π 112 π¬ 10 π 18Immergut asks Kennedy to respond on behalf of Oregon.
He highlights information about the pending transfer of Texas national guard members to Portland and Chicago. Received info minutes before this hearing. Hegseth memo raising additional concerns, like "playing rhetorical whack-a-mole."
This is scary. He is basically saying any Guard can be ordered to any state for any reason. Donβt let him set that precedent!
06.10.2025 03:01 β π 32 π 2 π¬ 2 π 0Hamilton also argues that California can't show standing and irreparable harm.
He adds that if the court issues TRO they will seek stay pending appeal.
Judge: "appropriate?"
Him: "not a policymaker"
Judge: "You're a lawyer"
Me: "Not for long"
Immergut: You're an officer of the court. Do you believe this is appropriate way to deal with my order?
Hamilton: I'm not a policy maker
Immergut: You're a lawyer
In response, Hamilton basically argues no geographic limit to federalization of CA guard...
She is something else, donβt mess with her. π π€£π
06.10.2025 02:12 β π 419 π 115 π¬ 12 π 5Military Generals and other military leaders are taking direction from an idiotic drunkard rapist propagandist and the 5x draft dodging coward who hired him. Not only a travesty but embarrassing and incredibly dangerous.
06.10.2025 02:14 β π 561 π 125 π¬ 21 π 7Judge Immergut first give DOJ opportunity to respond to second motion for TRO.
He says his understanding is that members of the federalized California National Guard are being deployed to Oregon.
Immergut: There has to be a colorable claim that OREGON conditions require it. But you don't. So what's the legal basis?
Hamilton: New guardsmen were not federalized...200 CA guard were relocated to Oregon.
Hamilton: 12406 has not been utilized much before in history so not much history.
Immergut: Why do you think not utilized?
Hamilton: I can't speak that..I can say president thought appropriate to federalize California guard back in June...