Kimba's Avatar

Kimba

@kimba1129.bsky.social

Leaving X. Straight ticket Democrat πŸ’™ Heartbroken over Kamala πŸ’” We got this!πŸ’™πŸŒŠπŸ’™πŸŒŠπŸ’™ Trump is a criminal Doing my best in N Michigan living in a sea of red ☹️ #Resist πŸŒŠπŸŒŠπŸŒŠπŸ‘ŠπŸ‘Š #BlueCrew πŸš€πŸš€ #BlueStormπŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™ #FBARMY πŸ’™βœŒοΈ #TheFlightCrewπŸ’™βœŒοΈ #StrongerTogether

24,627 Followers  |  16,225 Following  |  11,843 Posts  |  Joined: 12.11.2024  |  2.7854

Latest posts by kimba1129.bsky.social on Bluesky

BOOM πŸ”₯:

Judge Immergut issues a second Temporary Restraining Order prohibiting the relocation, federalization, or deployment of ANY NATIONAL GUARD FROM ANY STATE into the state of Oregon.

06.10.2025 03:20 β€” πŸ‘ 5722    πŸ” 1740    πŸ’¬ 186    πŸ“Œ 106
Post image

The dipshit in charge is too busy giving out his β€œcoins” and acting like he’s a celebrity to care.

06.10.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 3    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image 06.10.2025 02:59 β€” πŸ‘ 870    πŸ” 402    πŸ’¬ 20    πŸ“Œ 17

Thank you, Ms. Bower

06.10.2025 03:16 β€” πŸ‘ 8    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

[This is a reference to Oregon's request for broad TRO barring deployment of *any* federalized nationalized guard...not just California national guard, which the second TRO was filed in response to)

bsky.app/profile/anna...

06.10.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 404    πŸ” 55    πŸ’¬ 14    πŸ“Œ 1

Immergut: The question is the scope. I see the defendants' conduct as being in direct contravention of the court's order issued yesterday....I am troubled by the defendant's conduct, but have some concern about the breadth of the alternative relief requested during tonight's hearing

06.10.2025 03:14 β€” πŸ‘ 763    πŸ” 121    πŸ’¬ 19    πŸ“Œ 11

@annabower.bsky.social
She is on call

06.10.2025 03:15 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Awesome

06.10.2025 03:13 β€” πŸ‘ 6    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Immergut: I'm handling this on expedited basis, but defendants haven't provided new info.

SHE RULES FROM THE BENCH: I grant the plaintiffs motion for a second TRO based on reasons stated in previous order...

06.10.2025 03:12 β€” πŸ‘ 1706    πŸ” 446    πŸ’¬ 63    πŸ“Œ 85

Kennedy adds that state and local law enforcement in the state of Oregon and in the City of Portland will need to expend additional resources in response to any increased protest activity.

Immergut asks if they have anything further. Plaintiffs say no.

06.10.2025 03:11 β€” πŸ‘ 422    πŸ” 38    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 2

Kennedy is back to address harm for Oregon.

He says that Oregon has sovereign interest in what the needs of the state are. People of Oregon have that interest, including whether their own forces can handle law enforcement issues...

06.10.2025 03:10 β€” πŸ‘ 473    πŸ” 48    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

Riley: True that soldiers would still be federalized even if still in CA the state. But at least they'd be geographically located in the state...if they're out of state, logistical issue getting them back and under state control if there's an emergency.

06.10.2025 03:09 β€” πŸ‘ 466    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 1

Immergut: What's the irreparable harm for CA?

Riley: First is injury to our sovereign rights and police powers. California soldiers are being unwilling participants in a unlawful federal mission....

06.10.2025 03:08 β€” πŸ‘ 605    πŸ” 67    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 4

Riley: We don't think this would create jurisdictional conflict....Court has jurisdiction to enter new injunction

06.10.2025 03:07 β€” πŸ‘ 376    πŸ” 21    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Immergut has questions about California component.

Mentions that original TRO re: Oregon national guard appealed to 9th Circuit. What's the consequence if I grant this TRO, she asks.

Kennedy says he'll want Jane Riley to address for California.

06.10.2025 03:05 β€” πŸ‘ 399    πŸ” 26    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 0

Kennedy: We filed TRO based on California deployment here, then after that we received notice of the Hegseth memo re: Texas deployment. So now in position to need to broaden the relief to include deployment of national guard of an state and District of Columbia....

06.10.2025 03:03 β€” πŸ‘ 556    πŸ” 43    πŸ’¬ 9    πŸ“Œ 4
Post image

I Bet You Didn’t Know This? πŸ‘‡πŸΌπŸ‘‡πŸ½πŸ‘‡πŸΎ

06.10.2025 02:23 β€” πŸ‘ 180    πŸ” 112    πŸ’¬ 10    πŸ“Œ 18
Post image 06.10.2025 02:36 β€” πŸ‘ 293    πŸ” 156    πŸ’¬ 4    πŸ“Œ 2
Post image 06.10.2025 02:57 β€” πŸ‘ 28    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Immergut asks Kennedy to respond on behalf of Oregon.

He highlights information about the pending transfer of Texas national guard members to Portland and Chicago. Received info minutes before this hearing. Hegseth memo raising additional concerns, like "playing rhetorical whack-a-mole."

06.10.2025 03:02 β€” πŸ‘ 558    πŸ” 63    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 4

This is scary. He is basically saying any Guard can be ordered to any state for any reason. Don’t let him set that precedent!

06.10.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 32    πŸ” 2    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0
Google Image Result for https://y.yarn.co/03c40b88-62ee-4284-8887-49c1ceabfc84_text.gif

share.google/images/zTDew...

06.10.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Hamilton also argues that California can't show standing and irreparable harm.

He adds that if the court issues TRO they will seek stay pending appeal.

06.10.2025 03:01 β€” πŸ‘ 423    πŸ” 35    πŸ’¬ 11    πŸ“Œ 3

Judge: "appropriate?"

Him: "not a policymaker"

Judge: "You're a lawyer"

Me: "Not for long"

06.10.2025 03:00 β€” πŸ‘ 111    πŸ” 7    πŸ’¬ 2    πŸ“Œ 0

Immergut: You're an officer of the court. Do you believe this is appropriate way to deal with my order?

Hamilton: I'm not a policy maker

Immergut: You're a lawyer

In response, Hamilton basically argues no geographic limit to federalization of CA guard...

06.10.2025 02:59 β€” πŸ‘ 841    πŸ” 136    πŸ’¬ 22    πŸ“Œ 42
Post image

She is something else, don’t mess with her. πŸ˜…πŸ€£πŸ˜‚

06.10.2025 02:12 β€” πŸ‘ 419    πŸ” 115    πŸ’¬ 12    πŸ“Œ 5

Military Generals and other military leaders are taking direction from an idiotic drunkard rapist propagandist and the 5x draft dodging coward who hired him. Not only a travesty but embarrassing and incredibly dangerous.

06.10.2025 02:14 β€” πŸ‘ 561    πŸ” 125    πŸ’¬ 21    πŸ“Œ 7

Judge Immergut first give DOJ opportunity to respond to second motion for TRO.

He says his understanding is that members of the federalized California National Guard are being deployed to Oregon.

06.10.2025 02:55 β€” πŸ‘ 395    πŸ” 37    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0

Immergut: There has to be a colorable claim that OREGON conditions require it. But you don't. So what's the legal basis?

Hamilton: New guardsmen were not federalized...200 CA guard were relocated to Oregon.

06.10.2025 02:58 β€” πŸ‘ 509    πŸ” 50    πŸ’¬ 7    πŸ“Œ 10

Hamilton: 12406 has not been utilized much before in history so not much history.

Immergut: Why do you think not utilized?

Hamilton: I can't speak that..I can say president thought appropriate to federalize California guard back in June...

06.10.2025 02:57 β€” πŸ‘ 465    πŸ” 40    πŸ’¬ 5    πŸ“Œ 2

@kimba1129 is following 20 prominent accounts