Philippe Lagassé's Avatar

Philippe Lagassé

@plagasse.bsky.social

Academic working on defence policy/procurement and executive power in Westminster states. I'm aware of the typos.

6,643 Followers  |  1,030 Following  |  1,365 Posts  |  Joined: 12.10.2023  |  2.1478

Latest posts by plagasse.bsky.social on Bluesky

Post image Post image

There are paragraphs from the Glassco Commission's chapter on defence procurement that could have been written yesterday.

The chapter is worth re-reading as we move ahead with the Defence Investment Agency.

epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/301/...

07.10.2025 21:56 — 👍 3    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Preview
S11E2 Buying Bombs: Defence Procurement in Canada Podcast Episode · Curious Canadian History · 2025-10-07 · 1h 4m

Thanks to David Borys for having me on Curious Canadian History to discuss defence procurement:

podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/c...

07.10.2025 11:50 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Would look better with a periwig.

06.10.2025 18:00 — 👍 10    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Désolé 😂

06.10.2025 15:05 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

close enough for joking purposes!

06.10.2025 15:00 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

New at In Defence of Westminster:

open.substack.com/pub/lagassep...

06.10.2025 12:22 — 👍 5    🔁 2    💬 2    📌 3

The govt can fall any day in Canada at the moment.

06.10.2025 14:01 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

I dont think the UK’s woes are about the system!

06.10.2025 13:36 — 👍 1    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

So, how are we feeling about presidential systems?

#France #UnitedStates

06.10.2025 13:33 — 👍 27    🔁 3    💬 11    📌 1

NB, this post was inspired by the last CIEC’s wild interpretation of a ministerial
advisor, which ran contrary to a plain reading of the law.

06.10.2025 13:21 — 👍 2    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Preview
a man and a woman wearing crowns are standing next to each other and waving at the camera . ALT: a man and a woman wearing crowns are standing next to each other and waving at the camera .

I have an idea…

06.10.2025 13:17 — 👍 5    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

Great post, on a topic I've taken some academic interest in.

06.10.2025 13:13 — 👍 2    🔁 1    💬 0    📌 0

Thanks!

06.10.2025 13:04 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

New at In Defence of Westminster:

open.substack.com/pub/lagassep...

06.10.2025 12:22 — 👍 5    🔁 2    💬 2    📌 3

AI version:

“The DIA presents a unique opportunity. It is not just a organizational change; it is a strategic pivot in defence procurement.”

(Yes, that’s a joke.)

04.10.2025 16:19 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

For the weekend crowd, my take on Canada’s new Defence Investment Agency.

open.substack.com/pub/philippe...

04.10.2025 15:58 — 👍 10    🔁 3    💬 1    📌 0
Post image

New at Debating Canadian Defence:

open.substack.com/pub/philippe...

02.10.2025 16:51 — 👍 10    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

New at Debating Canadian Defence:

open.substack.com/pub/philippe...

02.10.2025 16:51 — 👍 10    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0
Post image Post image Post image

A few thoughts on Canada’s new Defence Investment Agency:

02.10.2025 13:03 — 👍 17    🔁 9    💬 3    📌 1

Yep

30.09.2025 19:31 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

I don't want to be overwrought here or anything, but if there was a vessel of concern in the Arctic, say a Chinese science ship that is doing questionable stuff, that would be handled by NORAD fighter aircraft first.

30.09.2025 16:08 — 👍 34    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0

For those who are unawares, the Commander of NORAD is always an American and has operational control of Canadian NORAD forces.

That's not just some thing that we do. It's a treaty-level agreement.

30.09.2025 15:56 — 👍 74    🔁 27    💬 3    📌 3

How, exactly, do the Canadian Armed Forces deploy on operations with an ally who doesn't respect ROEs?

30.09.2025 14:40 — 👍 263    🔁 118    💬 16    📌 9

Paging Lloyd Axworthy!

29.09.2025 16:15 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

As @stephaniecarvin.bsky.social points out, this is more rhetorical than anything else.

Still, it's interesting to see the shift from the talk of a values based foreign policy.

29.09.2025 15:52 — 👍 6    🔁 0    💬 2    📌 0

*NB idea that defence follows foreign policy doesn't really work. Far too much of defence policy is internally focused. It's better to see defence as a subset of national security and complementary with foreign policy.

29.09.2025 15:45 — 👍 12    🔁 0    💬 1    📌 0

It's often said that defence policy should flow from foreign policy in Canada.*

Now we have defence priorities leading foreign policy. Notable shift in framing.

29.09.2025 15:45 — 👍 13    🔁 5    💬 1    📌 1
Post image

New at Debating Canadian Defence:

open.substack.com/pub/philippe...

28.09.2025 15:56 — 👍 8    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0
Post image

New at Debating Canadian Defence:

open.substack.com/pub/philippe...

28.09.2025 15:56 — 👍 8    🔁 5    💬 0    📌 0

Indeed...sigh

27.09.2025 01:33 — 👍 0    🔁 0    💬 0    📌 0

@plagasse is following 19 prominent accounts