azure thorns's Avatar

azure thorns

@azurethorns.bsky.social

over 30 18+ only / no minors ๐Ÿšซ mostly twst, probably 50/50 nsfwโœจ

110 Followers  |  1,179 Following  |  183 Posts  |  Joined: 16.10.2024  |  2.1357

Latest posts by azurethorns.bsky.social on Bluesky


Post image 23.02.2026 22:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 42    ๐Ÿ” 21    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใพใŸใ“ใฃใกใซใ‚‚่ผ‰ใ›ใ‚‹ใฎๅฟ˜ใ‚Œใฆใพใ—ใŸใŒ็Œซใฎๆ—ฅใฎ่ฝๆใใ‚’...

24.02.2026 06:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใƒชใƒใญใ“ใ•ใ‚“

23.02.2026 00:17 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 20    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

WAKA-SAMA

#twstใƒ•ใ‚กใƒณใ‚ขใƒผใƒˆ
#twistedwonderland

22.02.2026 21:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 27    ๐Ÿ” 14    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใ‚ธใƒฃใƒŸใ‚ซใƒช

22.02.2026 09:43 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 47    ๐Ÿ” 24    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

The ultimate bebegorl ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐ŸŽ€๐Ÿฐ
#idiashroud #idiafanart #twistedwonderland #twstfanart

21.02.2026 09:04 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image

#Yumeship #twst #twistedwonderland #malleusdraconia #malleus #art

21.02.2026 18:13 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 12    ๐Ÿ” 3    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
illust twst floyd mer-form

illust twst floyd mer-form

๐Ÿฆˆ๏ผ

21.02.2026 18:02 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 17    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
illust twst

illust twst

ๆทฑๆตทใฎ้ญ”ๅฅณ

21.02.2026 11:56 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 24    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใญใ“ใฎใฒ๐Ÿพ

21.02.2026 20:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 27    ๐Ÿ” 15    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
illust Idia Shroud twst

illust Idia Shroud twst

ใ‚คใƒ‡ใ‚ขๆฐ๐Ÿ”ฅ็ทด็ฟ’ ้ซชใฎๆฏ›ๆใใฎๆฅฝใ—ใ„

31.12.2025 13:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 14    ๐Ÿ” 10    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image Post image Post image

ๅ†ฌใฎไบ‹ๆƒ…๐Ÿฉ

18.06.2025 13:36 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 40    ๐Ÿ” 24    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

๐Ÿณ

18.06.2025 13:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 20    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใƒใƒผใƒใ‚นใƒฉใ‚ฎ๐Ÿฉ

11.12.2025 13:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 22    ๐Ÿ” 12    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใญใ“ใกใ‚ƒใ‚“()ใชใƒฉใ‚ฎใใ‚“

21.02.2026 20:55 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 47    ๐Ÿ” 19    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

โ‹†.หš โ˜พโญ’.หš

#idia #twst #twistedwonderland #ใƒ„ใ‚คใ‚นใƒ†

20.02.2026 13:45 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 23    ๐Ÿ” 11    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

some mom bods #twst

16.02.2026 16:18 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 120    ๐Ÿ” 24    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I feel like Deuce Spadeโ€™s Magicam is just Jackass. Like the most absurd videos youโ€™ve ever seen of him and Ace + other freshman doing the most physically dangerous stupid shit possible. Occasional Cater feature totally eating dirt on his skateboard.

07.02.2026 16:39 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 10    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 4    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Article: The political effects of Xโ€™s feed algorithm

Abstract: Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects1. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Muskโ€™s platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7โ€‰weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed usersโ€™ feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to Xโ€™s algorithm has persistent effects on usersโ€™ current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

Article: The political effects of Xโ€™s feed algorithm Abstract: Feed algorithms are widely suspected to influence political attitudes. However, previous evidence from switching off the algorithm on Meta platforms found no political effects1. Here we present results from a 2023 field experiment on Elon Muskโ€™s platform X shedding light on this puzzle. We assigned active US-based users randomly to either an algorithmic or a chronological feed for 7โ€‰weeks, measuring political attitudes and online behaviour. Switching from a chronological to an algorithmic feed increased engagement and shifted political opinion towards more conservative positions, particularly regarding policy priorities, perceptions of criminal investigations into Donald Trump and views on the war in Ukraine. In contrast, switching from the algorithmic to the chronological feed had no comparable effects. Neither switching the algorithm on nor switching it off significantly affected affective polarization or self-reported partisanship. To investigate the mechanism, we analysed usersโ€™ feed content and behaviour. We found that the algorithm promotes conservative content and demotes posts by traditional media. Exposure to algorithmic content leads users to follow conservative political activist accounts, which they continue to follow even after switching off the algorithm, helping explain the asymmetry in effects. These results suggest that initial exposure to Xโ€™s algorithm has persistent effects on usersโ€™ current political attitudes and account-following behaviour, even in the absence of a detectable effect on partisanship.

Figure 2. ITT estimates of feed-setting changes on engagement and political attitudes. ITT effect estimates of switching the algorithm on and off (in s.d.). Left, effect of moving from the chronological to the algorithmic feed for users initially on the chronological feed. Right, effect of moving in the opposite direction for users initially on the algorithmic feed. For each outcome, the results of two specifications are reported. Blue, unconditional estimates with robust s.e., controlling only for the initial feed setting and, where applicable, pre-treatment outcome levels. Orange: conditional estimates, controlling for pre-treatment covariates using GRFs; 90% and 95% CIs are reported. Numerical effect sizes and Pโ€‰values correspond to the conditional estimates (all tests are two-sided). The unit of observation is respondent. From top to bottom, sample sizes are nโ€‰=โ€‰4,965, nโ€‰=โ€‰3,337, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,965, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,965, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,596, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,596 and nโ€‰=โ€‰4,850. Tests are described in Methods. Supplementary Information Table 2.16 reports the exact numerical point estimates, s.e., CIs and sample sizes for every specification. All outcomes are standardized. Additional results are presented in Supplementary Information section 2. PCA, first principal component from principal component analysis.

Figure 2. ITT estimates of feed-setting changes on engagement and political attitudes. ITT effect estimates of switching the algorithm on and off (in s.d.). Left, effect of moving from the chronological to the algorithmic feed for users initially on the chronological feed. Right, effect of moving in the opposite direction for users initially on the algorithmic feed. For each outcome, the results of two specifications are reported. Blue, unconditional estimates with robust s.e., controlling only for the initial feed setting and, where applicable, pre-treatment outcome levels. Orange: conditional estimates, controlling for pre-treatment covariates using GRFs; 90% and 95% CIs are reported. Numerical effect sizes and Pโ€‰values correspond to the conditional estimates (all tests are two-sided). The unit of observation is respondent. From top to bottom, sample sizes are nโ€‰=โ€‰4,965, nโ€‰=โ€‰3,337, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,965, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,965, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,596, nโ€‰=โ€‰4,596 and nโ€‰=โ€‰4,850. Tests are described in Methods. Supplementary Information Table 2.16 reports the exact numerical point estimates, s.e., CIs and sample sizes for every specification. All outcomes are standardized. Additional results are presented in Supplementary Information section 2. PCA, first principal component from principal component analysis.

X's algorithm is in fact doing what you think it's doing. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

18.02.2026 17:24 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 1880    ๐Ÿ” 729    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 30    ๐Ÿ“Œ 87
Post image

ใ‚จใƒšใ‚ธใƒฃใ‚ฏ

19.02.2026 02:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 23    ๐Ÿ” 10    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

็ฏ€ๅˆ†๏ผ๏ผ
#twstใƒ•ใ‚กใƒณใ‚ขใƒผใƒˆ

19.02.2026 03:27 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 59    ๐Ÿ” 36    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 1
Post image

๐Ÿบใ€€14/22ๅฎŒๆˆใƒƒ๐ŸŽถ

18.02.2026 17:32 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 53    ๐Ÿ” 16    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใ‚ชใƒใƒ–ใƒญ๐Ÿฆ
#twstใƒ•ใ‚กใƒณใ‚ขใƒผใƒˆ #ใƒ„ใ‚คใ‚นใƒ†ใƒ•ใ‚กใƒณใ‚ขใƒผใƒˆ

18.02.2026 12:29 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 50    ๐Ÿ” 23    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

idk what to use for my pfp but for now I draw Epel since he's my first twst oshi ๐ŸŽ

18.02.2026 12:22 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 8    ๐Ÿ” 4    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Idia Shroud at a desk with a laptop, wearing headphones, saying "CAN YOU LOCK TF IN."

Idia Shroud at a desk with a laptop, wearing headphones, saying "CAN YOU LOCK TF IN."

thanks idia

18.02.2026 08:37 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 32    ๐Ÿ” 17    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใ‚จใƒผ็›ฃ

25.12.2025 00:49 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 12    ๐Ÿ” 8    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

ใƒˆใƒฉใƒใƒฉ่ฝๆ›ธใ

05.12.2024 08:08 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 7    ๐Ÿ” 2    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

์žฌ๋ฐŒ๋‹ค

18.02.2026 17:28 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 6    ๐Ÿ” 5    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

surely not just drawing this for myself surely not

#twst #cater

18.02.2026 19:35 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 76    ๐Ÿ” 30    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Post image

็พŽๅ‘ณใ—ใ‹ใฃใŸใญใ‹ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใกใ‚ƒใบใฃใ‚Œใบใฎใƒใƒงใ‚ณ๐Ÿซ

18.02.2026 08:12 โ€” ๐Ÿ‘ 66    ๐Ÿ” 17    ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1    ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

@azurethorns is following 20 prominent accounts