US Ambassador threatens to tariff, annex, and bomb Canada if anti-American sentiment doesn't improve
19.09.2025 16:13 — 👍 1684 🔁 609 💬 313 📌 148@abizadeh.bsky.social
Political philosophy prof at McGill https://abizadeh.wixsite.com/arash
US Ambassador threatens to tariff, annex, and bomb Canada if anti-American sentiment doesn't improve
19.09.2025 16:13 — 👍 1684 🔁 609 💬 313 📌 148Institutional food policy matters. When it comes to addressing food insecurity, school lunches matter most. But I would be remiss not to note mine and my co-authors' article from Lancet Planetary Health arguing that universities should lead on food sustainability.
www.thelancet.com/journals/lan...
“My standing piece of advice for those who live in North America who pine to see the best-practice streets of dozens of places in Europe or want to educate colleagues/friends what’s possible: just go to Montreal. It’s much closer. They really have it all.”
16.09.2025 20:58 — 👍 25 🔁 4 💬 0 📌 0it serves the purposes of determining how to fulfil our aims; of assigning responsibility and blame; and of critically assessing a society’s normative standing in light of its power structure. /5
16.09.2025 16:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0Recognizing non-decisive, elicitory and structural, and non-causal categories of power is practically, morally, and evaluatively significant: /4
16.09.2025 16:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0It defends the idea that one can play a causal role without making a difference; structural power as a species of “elicitory” power, which does not operate by way of one’s intentional actions; and a non-causal category of power, whereby outcomes obtain without one playing a causal role. /3
16.09.2025 16:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Abstract: Many theorists assume that social power operates only by way of agents’ intentional actions and their causal influence on outcomes—where causality is understood to imply making a difference. This paper challenges all three assumptions. /2
16.09.2025 16:48 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I’m thrilled that my paper “Elicitory Structural Power and Agential Power” has been accepted for publication at 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘌𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘤𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘚𝘰𝘤𝘪𝘢𝘭 𝘗𝘩𝘪𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘰𝘱𝘩𝘺. It’s taken over 5y of rejections, so I’m especially pleased.
#poliphil #PolTheory #socialphil
An Albertan Tale: “They never picked their noses or had bowel movements or zits.”
02.09.2025 20:15 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0"bike lanes are still used as political scapegoats. But to what end? ...To deflect attention from real government failures – or from the inconvenient truth that bike lanes do not increase traffic congestion?"
www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/arti...
Ontario premier says he was elected by the people of Ontario to remove bike lanes in Toronto put in by the city council elected by the people of Toronto.
31.07.2025 18:23 — 👍 10 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0Shopkeepers in Montreal ordered to greet clients with “Goeiedag, Bonjour” instead of “Bonjour-Hi.”
The truth is in my neighbourhood we actually just say the ambiguous “Allô”
"Jonathan Caravello...was reportedly “piled on by multiple agents all at once” as “he tried to help a man in a wheelchair” who was having difficulty moving after...[ICE] agents threw canisters of tear gas"
our colleague is still missing as of the last info I got
dailynous.com/2025/07/12/p...
😮 did not know this one
30.06.2025 12:27 — 👍 3 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0If you’re dealing with a transactional adversary, you had better game this out—elbows down capitulation at first bark could just be an invitation for more threats
/4
This means A has an incentive to make threats if A thinks B is likely to bend, but make offers if A thinks B likely won’t.
This is why elbows up makes sense:
B has lots of reasons to respond to threats with intransigeance.
/3
But there’s a basic asymmetry b/w these from A’s perspective:
A pays the cost of an offer if and only if B *complies*
whereas
A pays the enforcement cost of a threat (e.g. impose tariffs that hurt A too) if and only if B *doesn’t* comply
/2
The Digital Tax capitulation has longterm consequences. One is to reduce Cdn bargaining power. Reminder to gov about bargaining power:
If A is trying to get B to do X, A can either:
threaten: “if you don’t do X, we impose big tariffs”
Or:
make an offer: "if you do X, we scratch your back”
/1
Not only has the language evolved from “based on” to “based off of,” we now have “spaced off” for “spaced out.”
So ‘out’ and ‘on’ are out, ‘off’ is in.
Or rather: ‘Out’ and ‘on’ are off, ‘off’ is on.
Some reflections by @ancagheaus.bsky.social on essay writing in age of AI
26.06.2025 14:24 — 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1Sorry I meant otherwise UNinteresting
20.06.2025 13:34 — 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Yes! Just posted something to that effect!
20.06.2025 13:33 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0As for the “chiefly”: surely it’s true of historians, but I doubt it’s quite true for someone taking a substantive philosophical approach. Causation is complicated: some are influential bc they are such powerful thinkers, which may explain both why they’re influential and why one is interested
20.06.2025 13:32 — 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0I can agree with the 1st statement only because there’s no “only” before your “because.” There may be some otherwise interesting thinkers whom we care about only because of their influence, but many we also care about because of the substance, and some we care about *despite* their meagre influence
20.06.2025 13:26 — 👍 6 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0Selon l’étude, les demandes d’admission d’étudiants internationaux ont chuté de 45,9% dans les universités québécoises. #immigration #enseignement
11.06.2025 11:37 — 👍 9 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 3GRIPP Annual Montreal Political Theory Manuscript Workshop Award 2025 co-winners:
Jakob Huber: Diachronic Democracy: A Political Philosophy of Hope @jakobhuber.bsky.social
Charles Girard, La liberté d’expression à l’épreuve: Dilemmes démocratiques @charlesgirard.bsky.social
Dates TBA
Co-lauréats 2025 du Prix de l’atelier annuel de théorie politique de Montréal du GRIPP:
Charles Girard, La liberté d’expression à l’épreuve: Dilemmes démocratiques @charlesgirard.bsky.social
Jakob Huber: Diachronic Democracy: A Political Philosophy of Hope @jakobhuber.bsky.social
Dates à venir
“Alchemist Review will use advanced AI capabilities to automatically extract key manuscript insights, including central claims, methodology assessment, reference validation, and research originality… to support OUP's editors in making more informed decisions while reducing administrative burden.”
09.06.2025 21:16 — 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0Jon Stewart is a legend & the way this show is trying to explain to a mainstream audience the gravity what is happening in the US is amazing. It was both thrilling & terrifying to be part of it. Thank you @TheDailyShow 👏
www.youtube.com/watch?v=vG7C...