❖

Will you go up? Or will you go down? And given your choice, do you believe yourself prepared to handle the consequences of your decision?

A threshold may only be crossed when you find yourself straddling the line between extremes. And upon breaching it, you'll always find new sets of extremes to dance between.

If a work is one that speaks for itself, what can it say? Only you can say.
So much for "speaking for itself."

Maybe it finds its way to your heart and compels you to say things instead.
So much for "speaking for yourself."

If even the creator forgets about it, was it worth creating? I say yes. It grants the creator the opportunity to see that they were negligent. Not just to their work - their offspring - but also toward themselves and their creative spirit.

Shed your layers.
Move with eagerness.
There's already more than enough wiggle room
than you think there is.
But when it all slows down,
respect the motions of the thing
that made you
and continues to make you.

The world will conduct your change at the rate it deems appropriate. You can't rush anything larger than you and if you try, you're going to driven to run straight into a brick wall.

It's also a good idea to eliminate "maybes" and "probablys" and "I thinks" in your writing, too. Makes achieving the goal appear that much more certain and inevitable.

Transformation is a given. And yes, doing it intentionally matters. But there's something that seemingly goes unspoken: there are natural limits to how much you can transform at a given time.

Awesome! Thanks for letting me know!

Just the continuous movement of things everywhere. If cognition also continues (long after death), then you'll have your answer! It would indeed be infinite. Or at least, may continue to think that it has no reason to stop.

There's only so much you can divide a finite world. There, some singular fact will shine through.

Wittgenstein was already said, so I'll say Leibniz.

Bad timing to stumble upon it right now - the site is down!

Managing and manipulating expectations. Creating intricate, overlapping and inseparable conflicts where if one thing happens, it sends waves throughout everything else.

Act 1 is masterful. In subsequent playthroughs, I couldn't get passed Act 2, though. I don't think it helped that I was playing on Tactician, because it made the experience so much worse, but hey! It was a fun time overall haha

I thought this was always the plan. Can't stop them. Unwilling to join them. Double down on strange subjects, situations, styles, and techniques. Everyone wins.

In this instance, going from not-weird to weird will immediately transition into comical because it'll produce too much joy in the one that weirdens the situation.

Number may be one of the broadest patterns mankind could've discovered - and that's what makes them some of the most fundamental.

If one considers motion an infinite process, then definitely.

Assuming you haven't played it before, I'd give Divinity Original Sin 2 a try. Put in about 100 hours on it on my first playthrough and it was my gateway into how Larian Studios does things. If you liked BG3, you'll find this one simpler, but you might like it!

First time seeing your game; very clean animation. Can very much tell that it's going to feel very nice to play, too. Good work!

a Belgium waffle shard

I'll ask for how much saliva spilled out of my mouth in the middle of the night.

I see! Isometric rogue-ish games with vibrant color palettes. It's probably a bit of a stretch since it's less "in the action" but are you able to tolerate turn-based games?

Hmmm... Linguistics 2.0? To make a syntax of syntaxes and the content therein? Seems similar to the project I've been jabbing at for the past couple of months.

Perusing!

One may choose to take creative liberties with any logic or tool of logic!

Must've been some real tasty sauce.

Pareidolia's going wild in this one! Great shot.

What was the last game you genuinely enjoyed playing?