Jakub Stauber's Avatar

Jakub Stauber

@stauberj.bsky.social

Political Science @fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz Political Parties | Information Flows | Defence Spending https://jstauber.github.io/

150 Followers  |  369 Following  |  16 Posts  |  Joined: 26.03.2025
Posts Following

Posts by Jakub Stauber (@stauberj.bsky.social)

Preview
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

Read our full analysis of how this unfolded here:
journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...

02.02.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

The ultimate polarizing issue? Vaccination. πŸ’‰
While mask-wearing showed some divides, the intention to vaccinate became the single strongest indicator of societal polarization. By the later waves, your party preference was a better predictor of your health choices than the actual health risks.

02.02.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Crucially, this polarization wasn't two groups drifting apart equally. It was asymmetric.
The data shows that the widening gap was largely driven by a specific segment, voters of the radical right, radicalizing their non-compliance, while the mainstream remained relatively cohesive.

02.02.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

So, when did the break happen?
Our models show the fracture widening significantly after Summer 2020.
As the crisis continued, the "fear" factor faded, and political identity took over. Polarization wasn't driven by the severity of the virus, but by the politicization of the response.

02.02.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Using 38 waves of panel data, we clearly see a massive "Rally around the Flag" effect in early 2020. πŸ‡¨πŸ‡Ώ
Initially, fear of the virus trumped politics. Compliance was high across the board. The polarization we talk about today didn't exist yet. Society held together.

02.02.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

There is a common narrative that the pandemic immediately fractured society.
But our data tells a different story.
In our new article in Political Studies Review, we track the timeline of polarization in Czechia.🧡
@psrjournal.bsky.social
@fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz

02.02.2026 13:43 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Check out chesdata.eu for the 1999-2024 CHES trend file, along with individual year surveys with both means and expert-level datasets.

We are also happy to release an updated CHES Shiny (CHES Interactive on the website) at chesdata.shinyapps.io/Shiny-CHES/!

18.11.2025 14:56 β€” πŸ‘ 14    πŸ” 6    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Join us today!

@fsv.charlesuni.cuni.cz

07.10.2025 06:31 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
The transnationalisation of military leaders in Central and Eastern Europe and EURO-Atlantic integration The professional transnationalisation of Central and Eastern European (CEE) militaries has been a pivotal factor in their integration into the Euro-Atlantic security community. This article examine...

New OA article: The transnationalisation of military leaders in Central and Eastern Europe and EURO-Atlantic integration by @tomaskucera.bsky.social www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

26.08.2025 12:25 β€” πŸ‘ 4    πŸ” 5    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks a lot!

04.07.2025 16:58 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

Thank you!

04.07.2025 10:49 β€” πŸ‘ 0    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Don’t count on the U.S.: can Russia achieve a rapid breakthrough in central Europe? The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine has significantly worsened the European security outlook. Simultaneously, concerns are growing over the United States’ willingness to commit substantial forces ...

7/7 🚩
European NATO can stop Russia without U.S. ground forcesβ€”if it acts decisively and prepares.
Our full open-access paper here:
πŸ“„ www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 2    πŸ” 1    πŸ’¬ 0    πŸ“Œ 0

6/
Why does it matter?
With U.S. focus shifting to China and political will declining, Europe must prepare to defend itself.
Our work shows this is possibleβ€”but only if Europeans invest now in troops, reserves, and logistics.

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

5/
πŸ—οΈ Key findings:

Numbers & readiness > technology alone

Deep, well-prepared defenses lower risks

Rapid NATO reinforcement is critical

Tech helps but can’t replace manpower

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

4/
In the larger Russian force scenario (with conscripts):
⚠️ Europe would need ~20+ brigades, stretching its capabilities.
Even then, success is uncertain without deep defenses & low troop exposure.

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

3/
In the smaller Russian force scenario:
βœ… ~10–13 European brigades (beyond Poland’s) are enough to prevent a breakthrough if deployed quickly.

But:
If Poland fights alone, Russia’s chances of success rise fast.

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0

2/
We simulate a Russian attack on northeastern Poland (Suwalki Gap) in the late 2020s.
Two scenarios:
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί ~120k troops (professionals)
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί ~200k troops (with conscripts)
We test how many NATO brigades are needed to stop a breakthrough in 3–4 weeks.

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 1    πŸ” 0    πŸ’¬ 1    πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

1/ 🧡 Can Europe defend itself if the U.S. steps back?
Our new study asks: Can European NATO members alone stop a Russian breakthrough in Poland? We model two scenarios and here’s what we found πŸ‘‡

04.07.2025 07:40 β€” πŸ‘ 5    πŸ” 4    πŸ’¬ 3    πŸ“Œ 0